Medicare Advantage (MA), the private plan option within Medicare, now enrolls more than half of all beneficiaries and is projected to keep expanding. The American College of Physicians (ACP) assesses the ethical and policy dimensions of this growth and its implications for the delivery of fair, high-quality, and fiscally responsible care to older adults and persons with disabilities. Payment and risk adjustment policies have created vulnerabilities to overpayment and favorable risk selection, whereas quality measurement remains fragmented and overly complex. Beneficiaries often face challenges in navigating plan choice, marketing practices, prior authorization, and access to clinicians and postacute services, with these barriers disproportionately affecting persons with low income, persons with several chronic conditions, or persons who live in rural communities. Limited transparency about ownership structures and relationships between insurers, "provider" networks, and investors complicates accountability and public oversight. ACP calls for reforms to ensure accurate payment, streamline and strengthen quality metrics, and protect enrollees from inappropriate utilization controls while supporting innovations that promote coordinated, patient-centered care. Collaborative engagement among policymakers, clinicians, health systems, insurers, and beneficiaries is essential to align MA with its original purpose and ensure that it complements traditional Medicare while providing accessible, affordable, and high-quality coverage for all who depend on it.

Human health and natural systems are intrinsically linked-stable natural systems enable healthy human life. Health systems aim to promote, restore, and maintain health. Health systems may promote human health while having detrimental effects on natural systems, contributing to the transgression of planetary boundaries, such as biosphere integrity, climate change, and the introduction of new entities like microplastics. To date, the health guideline field lacks methods to assess the impacts of health interventions on planetary boundaries. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group established the Planetary Health Project Group in 2023 to develop formal GRADE guidance for integrating planetary health into guideline recommendations to address this gap. Guided by the concepts of planetary health and planetary boundaries and following established methods for GRADE guidance development, the project group conducted iterative case study analyses, expert workshops, and a 2-round global Delphi consensus process. Four case studies were selected for application of this guidance before recommendations were finalized. The GRADE Working Group approved the official guidance. The Planetary Health Project Group presents 7 domains of guidance for incorporating planetary health aspects into the guideline development process, including highly desirable items and optional items. Highly desirable items include formally addressing planetary health in public health and health system guidelines and explicitly justifying its exclusion where it is not addressed. Judgments within the evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework should systematically integrate included evidence across the prioritized planetary boundaries and equity. This guidance aims to support guideline developers and policymakers in making evidence-based, trustworthy recommendations to protect individual and planetary health, while maintaining thoroughness and feasibility for guideline developers within the GRADE approach.

Meta-analyses of randomized trials have shown that sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and death for 15 years.

Giant cell arteritis is a relapsing large-vessel vasculitis affecting the aorta and its branches. It is the most common vasculitis in persons 50 years of age and older. Vision loss occurs in 18% of patients and is preventable with prompt recognition, evaluation, and treatment. Large-artery complications include stenosis, aortic aneurysms, or dissections. Glucocorticoid therapy is effective, but nearly 50% of patients experience relapse. Tocilizumab and upadacitinib are efficacious glucocorticoid-sparing therapies. Patients require long-term monitoring for aortic aneurysms, a late disease complication, even after therapy is discontinued.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal policymakers temporarily lifted long-standing restrictions on telemedicine, resulting in an unprecedented and rapid expansion of virtual care across video, audio, and asynchronous modalities. When integrated into longitudinal care relationships, telemedicine can increase access, reduce patient burden, and support continuity for people facing geographic, mobility, or socioeconomic barriers. However, telemedicine also introduces new clinical, regulatory, equity, and safety challenges that require deliberate policy design. Beyond its clinical considerations, telehealth offers environmental and logistical benefits, including reduced travel time and cost, decreased fuel consumption, lower transportation expenses, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. In this position paper, the American College of Physicians updates its previous policy paper on telemedicine to reflect changes in payment policy, licensure, prescribing authority, and utilization patterns that have occurred over the past decade and accelerated during the COVID-19 public health emergency. This paper focuses on access, payment policy, licensure, prescribing practices, equity, and patient safety across federal and state programs and private payers and emphasizes the conditions under which telemedicine should be integrated into clinical practice. Key developments addressed include the expansion and partial lapse of Medicare telemedicine waivers, evolving U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration rules governing prescribing, increased reliance on interstate practice, and normalization of telemedicine by private payers.