The liver is the main target organ for hematogenous metastases from colorectal cancer, and colorectal liver metastasis is one of the most difficult and challenging situations in the treatment. In order to improve the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment in China, the Guidelines have been edited and revised for seven times since 2008, including the overall evaluation, personalized treatment goals and comprehensive treatments, to prevent the occurrence of liver metastases, increase the local damage rate of liver metastases, prolong long-term survival, and improve quality of life. The revised Guideline version 2025 includes the diagnosis and follow-up, prevention, multidisciplinary team (MDT), surgery and local ablative treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, comprehensive treatment. The revised Guideline emphasizes precision treatment based on genetic molecular typing, especially recommending immune checkpoint inhibitors for dMMR/MSI-H patients, and enriched local treatment methods, such as liver transplantation, yttrium-90 microsphere selective internal radiotherapy, etc. The revised Guideline includes state-of-the-art experience and findings, detailed content, and strong operability.

Background: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most prevalent cancer of thyroid and is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers in the United States. The practice guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) for DTC management in adult patients (previously combined with thyroid nodules) were published initially in 1996, with subsequent revisions based on advances in the field. The goal of this update is to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, and those involved in health policy with rigorous, comprehensive, and contemporary guidelines to assist in the management of adult patients with DTC, emphasizing the patient journey beginning with a thyroid cancer diagnosis. Methods: The questions addressed were based, in part, on prior versions of the guidelines, with input from a larger, more diverse complement of stakeholders. The panel included members from multiple specialties involved in thyroid cancer care, including a patient advocate and an expert in systematic reviews/meta-analyses/guidelines who educated and supported task force members. The panel conducted systematic literature reviews to inform the recommendations and commissioned two additional systematic reviews. Published English-language articles were eligible for inclusion, with a final search date of July 1, 2024. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used for critical appraisal of evidence and determining the quality of data. The guidelines panel had editorial independence from the ATA. Competing interests of task force members were pre-vetted, regularly updated, communicated with task force members, and assessed and managed by ATA leadership and the Clinical Practice Guidelines and Statements Committee. Results: These revised guidelines begin with the initial cancer diagnosis and continue with recommendations for staging and risk assessment, initial treatment decisions, assessment of treatment responses, monitoring approaches, diagnostic testing, and subsequent therapies based on the strength of evidence for response and consideration of side effects and outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes and identified areas of need for additional high-quality research are highlighted. Conclusions: These revised evidence-based recommendations inform clinical decision-making in the management of DTC that reflect the changing science and optimize the evidence-based clinical care of patients throughout their journey with DTC. Critical areas of need for additional research are highlighted.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (NCCN Guidelines) for Wilms Tumor (WT; nephroblastoma) cover strategies for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of WT, which is the most frequent primary kidney tumor in children. WT can generally be separated into 2 histology types: favorable histology WT and anaplastic WT. Five-year survival is high for children with favorable histology WT who receive appropriate treatment; however, survival rates are much lower for patients who present with higher stage diffuse anaplastic WT. Treatment of WT can range from surgery alone to surgery plus intensive chemotherapy and radiation depending on whether the tumor is unilateral or bilateral, histology, and local stage. The goal of therapy is to maximize cure while minimizing long-term toxicities. The content featured in this issue covers the NCCN panel's recommendations for overall management of both favorable histology WT and anaplastic WT.

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. The NCCN Cervical Uterine Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions; examine relevant new data from publications, abstracts, and recent FDA approvals; and reevaluate and update recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's deliberations on the new FIGO 2023 staging system and updates on the new systemic therapy recommendations for the management of endometrial cancer.

This Policy Review provides recommendations for the use of PET imaging in patients with gliomas and represents a joint effort of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group for PET and the European Association for Neuro-Oncology. The initial guideline was published in 2016, and summarised the previously established clinical benefit of PET with radiolabelled glucose and amino acid tracers in patients with gliomas. Since then, numerous additional studies have been published on this topic, focusing on differential diagnosis, prediction of molecular information, and prognostication. Further studies evaluated PET for biopsy guidance and delineation of glioma extent for local therapy planning, including resection and radiotherapy. In patients undergoing treatment, PET was studied for the assessment of response to local and systemic treatments and PET-based standardised response criteria (PET RANO 1.0) were proposed. In this Policy Review, the updated recommendations are based on evidence generated from studies that validated PET findings by histomolecular findings or clinical course. This guideline further underscores the previously reported clinical value of PET imaging and the superiority of amino acid PET over glucose PET, providing a framework for the use of PET in the management of patients with gliomas. The guideline also underscores the scarcity of class 1 evidence showing that incorporating PET imaging into clinical workflows improves patient outcomes, highlighting priority areas for future clinical studies designed to address this gap.

In 2023, based on advances in the understanding of the pathological and molecular features of endometrial carcinoma, an updated International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was published, aiming to better define prognostic groups and identify relevant treatment subgroups by including factors reflecting tumour biology (histological subtypes, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular classification) alongside refinements of anatomical factors (peritoneal carcinomatosis and lymph node metastasis). As part of its mission to improve the quality of care for people with gynaecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) updated the ESGO-ESTRO-ESP evidence-based guidelines published in 2021 by incorporating this revised FIGO staging and the large body of new evidence addressing the management of endometrial carcinoma. The development process of these guidelines was based on a systematic literature review and critical appraisal process involving an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of 30 experts from relevant disciplines (gynaecological oncology, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and pathology). A patient representative was also included. Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 225 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and three patient representatives from Asia, Europe, North Africa, North America, the Middle East, and South America to ensure a global perspective. These guidelines comprehensively cover diagnosis, management, follow-up, and patient education. Management includes surgical and adjuvant therapy according to the stage of the disease, and metastatic and recurrent disease. The management algorithms and the principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

These recommendations apply to adults with newly diagnosed WHO Grade 2 diffuse glioma. Questions and Recommendations from the Prior Version of These Guidelines Without Change Question What is the optimal role of external beam radiotherapy in the management of adult patients with newly diagnosed low-grade glioma (LGG) in terms of improving outcome (i.e. survival, complications, seizure control or other reported outcomes of interest)?Recommendations Level I Radiotherapy is recommended in the management of newly diagnosed low-grade glioma in adults to prolong progression free survival, irrespective of extent of resection.Level II Radiotherapy is recommended in the management of newly diagnosed low grade glioma in adults as an equivalent alternative to observation in preserving cognitive function, irrespective of extent of resection.Level III Radiotherapy is recommended in the management of newly diagnosed low grade glioma in adults to improve seizure control in patients with epilepsy and subtotal resection.Level III Radiotherapy is recommended in the management of newly diagnosed low-grade glioma in adults to prolong overall survival in patients with subtotal resection.Level III Consideration of the risk of radiation induced morbidity, including cognitive decline, imaging abnormalities, metabolic dysfunction and malignant transformation, is recommended when the delivery of radiotherapy is selected in the management of newly diagnosed low grade glioma in adults.Question Which radiation strategies (dose, timing, fractionation, stereotactic radiation, brachytherapy, chemotherapy) improve outcomes compared to standard external beam radiation therapy in the initial management of low grade gliomas in adults?Recommendations Level I Lower dose radiotherapy is recommended as an equivalent alternative to higher dose immediate postoperative radiotherapy (45-50.4 vs. 59.4-64.8 Gy) in the management of newly diagnosed low-grade glioma in adults with reduced toxicity.Level III Delaying radiotherapy until recurrence or progression is recommended as an equivalent alternative to immediate postoperative radiotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed low-grade glioma in adults but may result in shorter time to progression.Level III The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy is not recommended over whole brain radiotherapy alone in the management of low-grade glioma, as it provides no additional survival benefit.Level III Limited-field radiotherapy is recommended over whole brain radiotherapy in the management of low-grade glioma.Level III Either stereotactic radiosurgery or brachytherapy are recommended as acceptable alternatives to external radiotherapy in selected patients.Question Do specific factors (e.g. age, volume, extent of resection, genetic subtype) identify subgroups with better outcomes following radiation therapy than the general population of adults with newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas?Recommendations Level II It is recommended that age greater than 40 years, astrocytic pathology, diameter greater than 6 cm, tumor crossing the midline and preoperative neurological deficit be considered as negative prognostic indicators when predicting overall survival in adult low grade glioma patients treated with radiotherapy.Level II It is recommended that smaller tumor size, extent of surgical resection and higher mini-mental status exam be considered as positive prognostic indicators when predicting overall survival and progression free survival in patients in adult low grade glioma patients treated with radiotherapy.Level II I It is recommended that seizures at presentation, presence of oligodendroglial histological component and 1p19q deletion (along with additional relevant factors-see Table 1) be considered as positive prognostic indicators when predicting response to radiotherapy in adults with low grade gliomas. Level III It is recommended that increasing age, decreasing performance status, decreasing cognition, presence of astrocytic histological component (along with additional relevant factors (see Tables 1, 2) be considered as negative prognostic indicators when predicting response to radiotherapy. New Questions and RecommendationsQuestion In adult patients with pathology confirmed WHO Grade 2 diffuse glioma is proton therapy superior to standard radiation therapy result in terms of overall survival, progression free survival, local control, complications, neurocognitive preservation, and quality of life (QOL)?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to provide guidance on the superiority or inferiority of proton radiation effect compared to standard radiation therapy on WHO Grade 2 diffuse glioma in terms of overall survival, progression free survival, local control, complications, neurocognitive preservation, and quality of life.Question In adult patients with pathology confirmed WHO Grade 2 diffuse glioma receiving radiotherapy, do the molecular markers IDH-1 status, MGMT promoter methylation status and 1p19q presence or absence result in better prediction of overall survival, progression free survival, local control, complications, neurocognitive preservation, and quality of life?Recommendation Level III It is suggested that 1p/19q deletion status be used as a positive prognostic indicator regarding the effect of radiation therapy on progression free survival and overall survival for WHO grade II diffuse gliomas.

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in theASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow theASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found athttps://ascopubs.org/nsclc-non-da-living-guideline.

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in theASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow theASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found athttps://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.

The NCCN Guidelines for Thyroid Carcinoma address the management of different types of thyroid carcinoma, including papillary, follicular, oncocytic, medullary, and anaplastic carcinoma. The NCCN Thyroid Carcinoma Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the panel's most recent recommendations regarding systemic therapies for thyroid carcinoma as well as the supporting clinical data.

Currently, percutaneous sampling via core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy is the primary choice to guide the management of patients with clinical or screen-detected breast lesions. Preoperative biopsies allow physicians to get pathological diagnoses as well as key prognostic and predictive data about the nature of the investigated process. Namely, adequate biopsy sampling is crucial for assigning lesions to one diagnostic category (B1-B5). Similarly, evaluating morphological (histotype, vascular invasion, necrosis, etc.) and immunohistochemical/molecular features (ER, PR, Ki-67, and HER2) is the key to address the most effective therapies, especially in the neoadjuvant setting. The multidisciplinary team should always discuss the results of percutaneous biopsies, whose global integration with clinical and radiological findings will drive the adoption of specific treatment options, particularly for uncertain (B3) and suspicious/malignant (B4-B5) lesions. In the present work, we report a comprehensive overview of breast percutaneous biopsy techniques, diagnostic categories, and multidisciplinary management based on widely acknowledged evidence of good clinical practice.

The guidelines project of the Brazilian Society of Pathology aims to disseminate recommendations for pathologists, surgeons, and clinicians, based on solid data from the literature and through adaptations of international guidelines to the reality of Brazilian physicians. This article is the result of the efforts of a group of pathologists, members of the Dermatopathology Committee of the Brazilian Society of Pathology, focused on melanocytic diseases, who, through topics, established pertinent recommendations for clinicians and surgeons for the accurate diagnosis of melanocytic lesions suspected of melanoma. This article aims to clarify the best way to perform excision in cases of suspected melanocytic lesions, as well as the pre-analytical care related to the material, how to interpret the anatomopathological report, and the situations in which immunohistochemical and molecular studies can be auxiliary tools for diagnosis and/or therapy.

The increasing detection of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) has raised concerns regarding overtreatment. For low-risk PTMC, either immediate surgery or active surveillance (AS) can be considered. To facilitate the implementation of AS, the Korean Thyroid Association convened a multidisciplinary panel and developed the first Korean guideline. AS is recommended for adults with pathologically confirmed Bethesda V-VI PTMC who have no clinical evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis, gross extrathyroidal extension, invasion of the trachea or recurrent laryngeal nerve, or aggressive histology. A baseline assessment requires high-resolution neck ultrasound performed by experienced operators to exclude extrathyroidal extension, tracheal or recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, and lymph node metastasis; contrast-enhanced neck computed tomography is optional. Patient characteristics, including age, comorbidities, and the capacity for long-term follow-up, should be thoroughly assessed. Shared decision-making should carefully weigh the benefits and risks of surgery versus AS, considering expected oncologic outcomes, potential complications, quality of life, anxiety, medical costs, and patient preference. Follow-up involves neck ultrasound and thyroid function tests every 6 months for 2 years and annually thereafter. Disease progression, defined as significant tumor growth or newly detected nodal or distant metastasis, warrants surgery. Despite remaining uncertainties, this guideline provides a structured framework to ensure oncologic safety and supports patient-centered AS.

Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) represent a significant treatment challenge for patients with colorectal cancer that significantly impact quality of life and limit survival.

Appendiceal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that frequently disseminate to the peritoneum. Management of appendiceal tumors is lacking high-quality data given their rarity and heterogeneity. In general, appendiceal tumor treatment is extrapolated in part from colorectal cancer or pooled studies, without definitive evidence of disease-specific benefit. Many practices are controversial and vary widely between institutions. A national consensus update of best management practices for appendiceal malignancies was performed to better standardize care. Herein, the authors present recommendations for the management of appendiceal tumors with peritoneal involvement.

Gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases is a debilitating disease with limited treatment options. This article describes an update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus guidelines addressing the management of gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases in line with the most recent evidence.

The incidence of kidney cancer is rising. It is the 7th most common cancer in men and the 10th most common in women. Diagnosis is based on imaging (thoraco-abdominopelvic computed tomography scan +/- abdominal magnetic resonance) and histopathology. Clear cell carcinoma is the most frequently observed histological subtype. Management of localized kidney cancer involves surgery or ablative treatments. Active surveillance is indicated in the indolent oligometastatic setting with local treatment in case of localized progression. Apart from this specific situation, two first-line therapeutic strategies are recommended in the metastatic setting : a dual immunotherapy regimen or the combination of immunotherapy with an antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Both combinations have demonstrated superior survival outcomes compared to sunitinib, the previous standard of care until 2019. Treatment selection should be individualized, considering the characteristics of the disease (histology, tumour burden, location of metastases and if they are threatening, speed of progression), potential side effects of the treatments, the patient's general health, comorbidities and preferences.

Advancements in melanoma management have underscored the need for periodic guideline updates every few years to reflect current clinical practices. Previous versions of melanoma clinical practice guidelines in Japan have primarily aimed to reflect global standards of care. This focus on international benchmarks was largely attributed to the scarcity of high-quality evidence from East Asia, necessitating reliance on Western references. Recent findings indicate differences in melanoma subtypes and drug efficacy between Western and East Asian populations. Therefore, efforts were made to incorporate data from East Asia in this revision, aiming to develop guidelines that better reflect the region's unique characteristics. This revision was commissioned by the Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) and Japanese Skin Cancer Society (JSCS) and was undertaken by a committee comprising experts across relevant fields who meticulously reviewed and systematized a wide range of literature on melanoma to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines. Literature searches were conducted by the Japan Medical Library Association. The recommendation statements were determined using the GRADE Grid approach. The guideline was developed in accordance with the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Creation Manual 2020, ver. 3.0. Twelve clinical questions (CQs) were established, and corresponding recommendation statements were provided for each CQ. For several CQs, the inclusion of data from East Asia resulted in recommendations that differed from those in Western guidelines. Considering that the biology of melanoma has been increasingly recognized to vary by subtype and ethnicity, guidelines should be developed independently for each region based on evidence specific to the melanoma characteristics of that region. We firmly believe that this Japanese clinical guideline for melanoma will contribute to improving melanoma management in East Asia.

Pituitary tumours, originating from endocrine cells of the anterior pituitary, are quite common, and in most cases well-controlled by surgery or medical treatment. However, a small subset of pituitary tumours presents with multiple local recurrences or tumour progression despite combined surgical, medical or radiotherapeutic treatment. These are known as aggressive pituitary tumours (APT); also called aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs); or, in the rare case of metastases, pituitary carcinomas (PC) or metastatic PitNETs. Early identification of APT is challenging but is of major clinical importance as they are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality even in the absence of metastases. Here, we provide a revision of the first international, interdisciplinary European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) clinical practice guideline on APTs and PC (2018). Since publication of the 2018 guideline, results from the second ESE survey on APT and PC were published, and more data on APT treatment, including temozolomide, immune checkpoint inhibitors and bevacizumab, emerged. These data are reviewed in this guideline and translated into a practical algorithm to guide APT and PC management. Furthermore, standardized reporting of imaging and histopathological investigations of these tumours is proposed, and the role of molecular analysis is discussed. Last, a section is dedicated to special circumstances such as APT in pregnancy.