Marstacimab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tissue factor pathway inhibitor, is approved for prophylactic use in individuals with hemophilia A or B without inhibitors. We present efficacy and safety for individuals with inhibitors. The open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study evaluated once-weekly subcutaneous flat-dose marstacimab in males aged 12 to <75 years with severe hemophilia A or moderately severe to severe hemophilia B. Participants with inhibitors received bypassing agents (on-demand or routine prophylaxis) during a 6-month observational phase (OP) before entering a 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) with marstacimab. Primary end points were annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of treated bleeds and safety. Of 60 participants with inhibitors in the OP, 51 entered the ATP and received marstacimab. In the on-demand group (n = 48), mean estimated ABR declined from 19.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.12-24.27) in the OP to 1.39 (95% CI, 0.85-2.29) during the ATP (ABR ratio, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.042-0.118]; 2-sided P< .0001). Results were consistent by hemophilia type (ABR ratio, 0.05 [hemophilia A, n = 40]; 0.13 [hemophilia B, n = 8]). Participants reported significant improvements in health-related quality of life. Adverse events were common but mostly mild; 1 treatment-related grade 3 skin rash led to discontinuation. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 19.6% of participants, with no apparent effect on efficacy or safety. In participants with inhibitors, marstacimab was associated with reduced bleeding rates and an acceptable safety profile, with no thromboembolic events. Marstacimab may be a viable treatment option for people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03938792. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03938792.

We assessed the overall survival (OS) impact of time to relapse (TTR) in multinational cohorts with independent observational and randomized validation. Patients with nMTCL with frontline complete response were assigned to TTR12 (≤12 months) or without TTR12 based on time to progression or next therapy. OS analyses included modified landmark (m-LM), standard landmark (s-LM), and time-dependent Cox (td-Cox), adjusting for age, histology, and prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) score. Across 452 patients, 165 (36.5%) had TTR12, 181 (40%) relapsed at ≥12 months, and 106 (23.5%) remained relapse-free. TTR12 conferred worse OS using m-LM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.90; P< .001), s-LM (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39-2.66; P< .001); and td-Cox (HR, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.94-11.46; P< .001). Results were consistent in the independent validation cohorts. TTR12 consistently conferred worse OS irrespective of frontline stem cell transplantation or PIT score, in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (m-LM: HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.51-3.55; P< .001; s-LM: HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.31; P = .001), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (m-LM: HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.18-9.50; P = .023; s-LM: HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.02-8.81; P = .046), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell/T follicular helper cell lymphoma (m-LM only: HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.21; P = .013). Second-line novel therapies improved OS (second-line start to death) vs chemotherapy in TTR12 only (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .038; without TTR12: HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32; P = .407). TTR12 serves as a prognostic and potential OS surrogate marker, supporting stratification of new risk groups and need for their differential treatment.

We compared daunorubicin/cytarabine plus fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin (DAGO2) with CPX-351 (CPX; 1:2 randomization) in 439 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged ≥60 years (median age, 68 years) without known adverse-risk cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 35 months. Patients not in measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission after course 1 could enter a second randomization between standard and intensified chemotherapy. Post-course 1, the overall response rate (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematological recovery) was greater after DAGO2 (60% vs 47.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.61; P = .016). Following course 2, the overall response was not significantly different (85% for DAGO2 vs 78% for CPX; P = .095). More patients attained CR with MRD negativity after course 1 in the DAGO2 arm (47% vs 29% for CPX; OR, 0.46; P = .004). We observed better 3-year event-free survival (34% vs 27%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P = .012) and overall survival (52% vs 35%; HR, 0.62; P = .001) with DAGO2. CPX did not provide a survival benefit in patients with myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations and was associated with poorer survival in patients with NPM1 (HR, 2.83) and FLT3 mutations (HR, 2.14). Overall, 37% of patients underwent transplantation in first remission, with no difference in transplantation frequency or survival after transplant between randomization groups. Among patients entering the course 2 randomization (n = 107), survival was equivalent between standard and intensified CPX doses (P = .565). In conclusion, in this population of older patients with AML without known adverse-risk cytogenetics, DAGO2 resulted in superior survival compared with CPX. CPX did not benefit patients with MDS-related mutations over DAGO2. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02272478.

Myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) is associated with an excellent prognosis but high treatment-related toxicity and mortality. The Phase 3 Clinical Trial for CPX-351 in ML-DS 2018 aimed to maintain the excellent event-free survival (EFS) achieved in the previous ML-DS 2006 trial while reducing the treatment intensity. Intensity-reduced induction and reinduction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin with or without etoposide was replaced with CPX-351 (66 U/m2 on 3 days in course 1 and on 2 days in course 2). Risk stratification was based on flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD) after first induction. High-risk patients received high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 per 12 hour) in consolidation; standard-risk patients received cytarabine at a dose of 1 g/m2 per 12 hour. A total of 35 patients were enrolled until the trial was halted because of an unexpectedly high relapse rate. A per-protocol interim analysis revealed a significantly lower 24-month EFS when compared with the ML-DS 2006 trial (69% vs 90%; P< .001). In contrast with previous studies, most patients who relapsed responded to salvage therapy, leading to a comparable 24-month overall survival of 88% (vs 92%; P = .612). CPX-351 demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile with no treatment-related mortality. Positive MRD by error-corrected GATA1 next-generation sequencing, the presence of trisomy 8 or a complex karyotype were associated with an increased risk for relapse. In conclusion, replacing intensity-reduced induction therapy with CPX-351 in ML-DS led to a significantly lower EFS, highlighting the need for dose optimization to balance the efficacy and toxicity in this sensitive patient population. This trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EudraCT #2018-002988-25.

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) represent a high-risk biomarker in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, their prognostic value among transplant-eligible (TE) patients receiving daratumumab/bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-VRd) remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed CTC in the phase 3 PERSEUS/EMN017 trial. TE-NDMM patients were randomized (1:1) to D-VRd with daratumumab/lenalidomide maintenance (D-VRd group) or bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) with lenalidomide maintenance (VRd group), both with transplant. A subset of 451 of 709 patients from PERSEUS (D-VRd, 231/355; VRd, 220/354) had screening blood samples collected for CTC analysis by flow cytometry. CTC were detected in 370 patients (82%; median limit of detection, 0.0004%). CTC were prognostic of progression-free survival (PFS), independent of other factors, as a continuous (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.60]; P< .001) and categorical variable (≥0.175% CTC-high, optimal threshold). D-VRd improved PFS vs VRd in CTC-low patients (4-year rates: 88% vs 74%; HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.25-0.70]; P = .0013). Regardless of study treatment, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates were lower in CTC-high vs CTC-low patients (10-5: 52.2% vs 66.2%; 10-6: 34.8% vs 52.4%). D-VRd significantly increased MRD-negativity rates vs VRd among CTC-high (10-5: 69.4% vs 33.3%; 10-6: 47.2% vs 21.2%; both P< .05) and CTC-low patients (10-5: 74.4% vs 57.8%; 10-6: 65.6% vs 38.5%; both P< .001), with similar observations for sustained MRD-negativity. CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor in TE-NDMM treated with standard-of-care frontline quadruplet. D-VRd improved and sustained MRD-negativity rates in CTC-high and CTC-low, and improved PFS for CTC-low with a positive trend in CTC-high patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03710603.

Pirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), resistant to covalent BTKi (cBTKi). We analyzed genomic correlations with response and resistance to pirtobrutinib in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with CLL pretreated with cBTKi enrolled in the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial. DNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline, on treatment, and at progressive disease (PD). Common alterations at baseline included mutations in BTK (43%), TP53 (38%), SF3B1 (25%), NOTCH1 (23%), ATM (19%), XPO1 (11%), PLCG2 (9%), BCL2 (8%), and 17p deletion (28%). Common baseline BTK mutations included C481S (85%), C481R (10%), C481F (6%), and C481Y (4%). At PD, 60 of 88 patients (68%) acquired ≥1 mutation, including 44% with acquired BTK mutations and 24% with other acquired mutations. A total of 55 acquired BTK mutations were detected in 39 patients, including gatekeeper mutations (T474I/F/S/Y/L, 26%), kinase-impaired L528W (16%), C481S/R/Y (5%), V416L (2%), and A428D (1%) and others proximal to the adenosine triphosphate-binding pocket, D539A/G/H (1%) and Y545N (1%). Decrease or complete clearance of BTK C481x was observed at PD in 36 of 43 patients (84%). Using a more sensitive assay, 37% (18/49) of acquired BTK mutations were detected at baseline at low allele frequency. Using a highly sensitive assay at progression, a similar frequency of acquired BTK mutations (39%) was detected, and all patients had detectable acquired mutations. This study highlights the complex clonal dynamics of BTK mutations in patients with R/R CLL undergoing pirtobrutinib treatment, and the extent of resistance without an obvious genomic driver. Trial registration: #NCT03740529 at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) poses a challenge in hematology given its varied symptoms, and the complex interplay between disease and treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The phase 3 POLARIX study demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a similar safety profile with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) vs R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Here, we evaluate HRQoL through patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to fully characterize the patient experience in the POLARIX study. Changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma symptoms, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were assessed, as well as incidence and severity of common symptoms by PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events (AEs). Baseline characteristics of PRO-evaluable patients (N = 874) were consistent. Comparison between PROs and clinician-reported AEs revealed a notable discordance; patients generally reported a higher incidence of symptoms than clinicians, emphasizing the need for patient-centric tools to accurately capture the patient experience. Both treatments exhibited rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms, with the most substantial improvements seen in global health status/QoL, lymphoma symptoms, fatigue, role, emotional, and social functioning. GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting) were generally similar between treatment arms and returned to baseline levels after treatment completion. These HRQoL data underscore the complementarity of PROs, as an adjunct to clinician-reported AEs, in evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of new treatments, including Pola-R-CHP, which may represent a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03274492.

Epcoritamab is a subcutaneous CD3×CD20 bispecific antibody approved as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). We evaluated fixed-duration epcoritamab with rituximab plus lenalidomide (R2) in R/R FL in arm 2 of EPCORE NHL-2 (phase 1b/2). Patients received epcoritamab (2 step-up doses, then 48-mg full doses) for up to 2 years, and R2 for up to 12 cycles (28 days per cycle). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) per investigator assessment (Lugano criteria). As of 21 September 2024, 108 patients received ≥1 epcoritamab dose in expansion (median follow-up, 28.2 months). Median age was 65 years; 57% had 1 previous line of therapy. ORR and complete response (CR) rate were 96% and 88%, respectively; CR rates in patients with high-risk features were 90% (primary refractory), 82% (refractory to anti-CD20 and an alkylating agent), and 83% (disease progression within 24 months of first-line therapy). Two-year estimates for remaining in CR, progression-free survival, overall survival, and not starting next antilymphoma therapy were 82%, 76%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Minimal residual disease negativity was observed in 86% of evaluable patients (clonoSEQ assay). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included neutropenia (65%), COVID-19 (59%), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 51%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 87% of patients; 5 had grade 5 TEAEs (all COVID-19). CRS events were mostly low grade (grade 1, 38%; grade 2, 11%; grade 3, 2%), all resolved, and none led to epcoritamab discontinuation. Fixed-duration epcoritamab plus R2 demonstrated deep, durable responses with manageable safety and favorable outcomes in R/R FL, irrespective of risk features. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04663347.

Because frail patients and patients aged ≥80 years with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are still underrepresented in clinical trials, the CLL-Frail trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib in these patients. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) after 6 cycles of treatment to test the null hypothesis of ORR ≤65%. Fifty-three patients were included in the trial, and 34 patients are still on therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were the most frequent reason for early discontinuation (10 patients), whereas 5 patients stopped treatment because of death. Median age was 81 years, and 47.2% of patients were frail. The ORR for the 46 patients receiving ≥3 cycles of treatment was 93.5% (95% confidence interval, 82.1-98.6) meeting the primary end point of this trial (P < .001). The estimated 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 93.3% and 95.7%, respectively, after a median follow-up of 19 months. 53.5% of patients reported an improvement in their self-perceived frailty. Although all patients experienced AEs, and severe (Common Terminology Criteria of ≥3) events were reported in 63.5% of patients, there were no events of severe bleeding and atrial fibrillation was rare (2 cases of Common Terminology Criteria Grades 2 and 3). Five patients died, of which 4 deaths happened during or <28 days after treatment. Infections/COVID-19 were the cause of death in 3 cases. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective trial in older and/or frail patients with CLL demonstrating a high efficacy and safe treatment with acalabrutinib monotherapy. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04883749.

Functional high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) is defined as an unexpected, early relapse (ER) of disease in the absence of baseline molecular or clinical risk factors (RF), making FHR MM inherently dependent on which RFs were assessed at diagnosis, and what treatment patients received. To establish the true incidence of FHR, we analyzed uniformly treated, transplant-eligible patients from the Myeloma-XI (MyXI) trial that had been profiled for the International Myeloma Society and Working Group (IMS/IMWG) defined high-risk cytogenetic aberrations (HRCA), and the SKY92 gene expression HR signature (GEP-HR). A total of 135 MyXI patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 88 months; 25 (18.5%) experienced ER, defined as relapse <18 months from maintenance randomization post-autologous stem-cell transplantation. Hereof, 15 (60%) were IMS/IMWG-HR at diagnosis, of whom 8 were also GEP-HR. Another 6 patients were GEP-HR only and would have been missed by IMS/IMWG-HR. Among 4 patients with IMS/IMWG- and GEP-standard risk, 2 had isolated HR markers at diagnosis, leaving only 2 patients (8% of ER; 1.5% of all) truly meeting all FHR-criteria. Combined IMS/IMWG-HR and GEP-HR profiling identified 84% of ER, and differentiated long-term outcome across all 135 patients: co-occurring IMS/IMWG and GEP-HR was associated with very short overall survival compared to the absence of both (HR = 13.1; 95% CI, 6.5-26.1, P < .0001), followed by GEP-HR only (HR = 5.1; 95% CI, 2.4-11.1, P < .0001) and IMS/IMWG-HR only (HR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.2, P = .0007). Our results support more comprehensive baseline diagnostic profiling to identify those at risk of ER upfront. The trials were registered at the ISRCTN Registry as ISRCTN49407852 and at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01554852.

Older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) present unfavorable genetic and microenvironmental alterations. In this phase 2 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (ZR2) in patients with de novo DLBCL aged ≥75 years. Forty patients were enrolled, and the primary end point was the complete response rate, which was 65.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.3-78.9) at the end of induction treatment. The 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 67.1% (95% CI, 50.1-79.4) and 82.4% (95% CI, 66.5-91.2). The most common grades 3 and 4 hematologic adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (n = 14 [35.0%]). The most common grades 3 and 4 nonhematologic AEs were increased alanine transaminase (n = 5 [12.5%]) and aspartate transaminase levels (n = 5; 12.5%), and pulmonary infection (n = 5 [12.5%]). No events of atrial fibrillation were observed. Importantly, the efficacy of ZR2 was more dependent on tumor microenvironmental than genetic alterations, and was associated with upregulation of class I and II human leukocyte antigen and increased number and function of conventional type 1 dendritic cells. Preexisting expansion of intratumoral CD8+ T cells and treatment-induced clonal T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire contributed to better clinical outcome. TCR sequencing of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from patients with durable remission detected the expanded T-cell clones 3 years after treatment. These findings thus improve the understanding of the effect of T-cell immunological memory on ZR2-based immunotherapy, and support a paradigm shift toward mechanism-based targeted therapy of aggressive lymphoma. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04460248.

T-cell engagers (TCEs) are transformative therapeutics in hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Initially approved for relapsed/refractory disease settings, TCEs are now explored in first-line and second-line settings, often combined with standard-of-care (SOC) treatments, including chemotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates. This study investigates glofitamab (CD20×CD3 TCE) combinations in preclinical humanized lymphoma models, addressing heterogeneity of tumor antigen expression, immune evasion, and T-cell exhaustion. Combining glofitamab with R-CHP-Pola (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, and polatuzumab vedotin) chemotherapy or Pola demonstrated strong synergistic antitumor efficacy with rapid tumor regression and reduced tumor cell proliferation. Glofitamab combination with gemcitabine/oxaliplatin also demonstrated strong efficacy, enhancing intratumor T-cell number, activation, and reduced exhaustion. These combinations were particularly advantageous in models with low and heterogeneous CD20 expression, facilitating rapid tumor debulking and elimination of CD20-low/CD20- cells. Translational studies with patient-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells receiving glofitamab combination with chemotherapies demonstrated sustained T-cell functionality throughout extended treatment cycles. Novel chemotherapy-free combinations, including CD19-targeted 4-1BBL and CD19-CD28, amplified glofitamab activity, especially in CD20 high- and homogenous-expressing tumor models, with dual costimulatory approaches revealing synergy. In addition, the combination with checkpoint inhibitors (programmed cell death protein 1/Lag3-bispecific antibody) and regulatory T-cell depletion (α-CD25) emerged as promising approaches for enhanced efficacy and to sustain T-cell functionality. These findings highlight the versatility of glofitamab when integrated with SOC and innovative combinations, addressing resistance and improving patient outcomes. The preclinical investigations provide a strong foundation for ongoing and future clinical trials, emphasizing the need to tailor TCE-based combination therapies to maximize efficacy while minimizing toxicity in lymphoma treatment. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04408638 and NCT03467373.

With up to 10 years of follow-up, we report results from the final analysis of RESONATE- 2, a phase 3 study of first-line ibrutinib vs chlorambucil for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Patients aged ≥65 years with previously untreated CLL/SLL without del(17p) were randomly assigned to receive either single-agent ibrutinib (420 mg/d; n = 136) or chlorambucil (0.5-0.8 mg/kg; ≤12 cycles; n = 133). With a median follow-up of 9.6 years in the ibrutinib arm, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 to not estimable [NE]) vs 1.3 years (95% CI, 0.9-1.6) for the chlorambucil arm. Among patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (uIGHV), del (11q), mutated TP53, or complex karyotype, the median PFS was 8.4 years (95% CI, 6.8 to NE) with ibrutinib and 0.7 years (95% CI, 0.4-1.2) with chlorambucil. Median overall survival (OS) with ibrutinib was not reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included diarrhea (52%), fatigue (41%), cough (39%), nausea (32%), arthralgia (31%), peripheral edema (31%), and hypertension (30%). During the entire study period, 34 of 136 patients (25%) had an ibrutinib dose reduction due to AEs; these AEs improved in 30 of 34 patients (88%). At study completion, 27% of patients remained on first-line ibrutinib treatment. This landmark RESONATE-2 study defines median PFS and demonstrates continued OS benefit of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL, including those with high-risk genomic features. Sustained efficacy and tolerability of ibrutinib reemphasize the favorable benefit-risk profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01722487/NCT01724346.

Attempting to induce a complete remission before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) is current practice in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, benefit of remission induction strategy (RIST) before alloHCT has never been proven in a prospective trial. Potent conditioning regimens exist that allow for successful alloHCT in patients with active AML. Therefore, the ASAP trial was conducted to test RIST by salvage chemotherapy before alloHCT against immediate transplant after intensified conditioning. In total, 281 patients with AML with poor response after first induction or untreated first relapse were randomized 1:1 to RIST with high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone vs immediate alloHCT with sequential conditioning after nonintensive disease control (DisC) measures, preferentially watchful waiting only. Overall survival at 5 years from randomization analyzed according to intention-to-treat was 46.1% for DisC vs 47.5% for RIST (P = .82). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, genetic AML risk according to European LeukemiaNet criteria (P < .0001), age (P = .001), and comorbidities (P = .046) predicted survival, but not treatment arm (hazard ratio, 1.08 for DisC vs RIST; P = .67). In conclusion, long-term follow-up of the ASAP trial showed no survival advantage for standard salvage chemotherapy before alloHCT as opposed to immediate alloHCT. The trial results question the general concept of RIST with intensive standard salvage therapy before alloHCT for all patients, because immediate alloHCT may reduce time in hospital and health care expenses. Novel bridging therapies that are well tolerated, and posttransplant maintenance with targeted drugs are urgently warranted, especially for adverse-risk AML, to improve outcomes after alloHCT. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02461537.

Marstacimab targets the tissue factor pathway inhibitor to rebalance hemostasis. Previous phase 1 and 2 trials established marstacimab safety and efficacy in adults with severe hemophilia A (HA) or B (HB). BASIS is an open-label, marstacimab phase 3 trial in males aged 12 to 74 years with severe HA (factor VIII <1%) or moderately severe to severe HB (factor IX ≤2%). Participants without inhibitors received on-demand (OD) or routine prophylaxis (RP) therapy during a 6-month observational phase (OP) before receiving once-weekly subcutaneous 150 mg marstacimab during a 12-month active treatment phase (ATP). Primary end points were annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds vs previous OD or RP during the OP, and safety. Of 128 participants enrolled in the OP, 116 received marstacimab in the ATP. In the OD group (n = 33), mean ABR decreased from 39.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.05-48.07) in the OP to 3.20 (95% CI, 2.10-4.88) in the ATP, demonstrating superiority of marstacimab (estimated ABR ratio, 0.080 [95% CI, 0.057-0.113]; P < .0001). In the RP group (n = 83), mean ABR decreased from 7.90 (95% CI, 5.14-10.66) in the OP to 5.09 (95% CI, 3.40-6.78) in the ATP, demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of marstacimab (estimated ABR difference, -2.81 [95% CI, -5.42 to -0.20]; P = .0349). There were no deaths or thromboembolic events. Weekly subcutaneous marstacimab reduced ABR vs OD or RP therapy in the OP in individuals with severe HA or moderately severe to severe HB without inhibitors. Marstacimab was safe and well tolerated with no unanticipated side effects. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03938792.

The prognosis for relapsed or refractory (R/R) nucleophosmin 1-mutated (NPM1m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor and represents an urgent unmet medical need. Revumenib, a potent, selective menin inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of R/R acute leukemia with a KMT2A translocation in patients aged ≥1 year based on results from the phase 1/2 AUGMENT-101 study. Here, we present results from patients with R/R NPM1m AML enrolled in the phase 2 portion of AUGMENT-101. Enrolled patients received revumenib with or without a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor every 12 hours in 28-day cycles. Primary end points were rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh; CR + CRh), safety, and tolerability. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. As of 18 September 2024, 84 patients received ≥1 dose of revumenib. Median age was 63 years; 1 patient was aged <18 years. The protocol-defined, efficacy-evaluable population for the primary analysis included 64 adult patients (≥3 previous lines of therapy, 35.9%; previous venetoclax, 75.0%). The CR + CRh rate was 23.4% (1-sided P = .0014); the ORR was 46.9%. Median duration of CR + CRh was 4.7 months. Of 30 responders, 5 (16.7%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and 3 resumed revumenib after HSCT. Treatment-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 4 patients (4.8%). Revumenib demonstrated clinically meaningful responses in this heavily pretreated, older population with NPM1m AML, including remissions that enabled HSCT. The safety profile of revumenib was consistent with previously reported results. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04065399.

Modakafusp alfa is a first-in-class immunocytokine-directing interferon alfa to CD38+ cells. Our previous phase 1/2 trial identified 2 potential phase 2 doses of modakafusp alfa for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): 1.5 or 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The overall response rate (ORR) among 30 patients treated at 1.5 mg/kg was 43%. This phase 2 dose optimization study randomized 147 patients with triple-class refractory disease and ≥3 previous lines of therapy 1:1 to modakafusp alfa 120 mg (n = 71) or 240 mg (n = 75) every 4 weeks (fixed-dose equivalents of 1.5 and 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks). Patients had received a median of 6 previous lines of therapy; 66% were penta-exposed and 45% had previously been exposed to anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) therapy. Modakafusp alfa development was discontinued for strategic reasons by the sponsor and the study was terminated early. At median follow-up of 7.3 and 7.6 months in the 120- and 240-mg arms, ORRs were 32% and 41%, and median progression-free survival was 4.1 and 5.3 months, respectively. ORRs were higher in patients who had not received previous BCMA therapy (46% vs 29%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) in the 120- and 240-mg arms were thrombocytopenia (75% and 84%; grade ≥3, 55% and 61%; respectively) and neutropenia (68% and 73%; grade ≥3, 56% and 68%; respectively); 90% and 96% of patients, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 TEAEs; 39% and 44%, respectively, experienced serious TEAEs. Our results confirm the efficacy of single-agent modakafusp alfa for patients with RRMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03215030.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC) have limited treatment options. The phase 3 ENHANCE-3 study aimed to determine whether magrolimab (magrolimab arm) was superior to placebo (control arm) when either was combined with venetoclax and azacitidine. Adults with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for IC were randomized to receive magrolimab (1 mg/kg on days 1 and 4, 15 mg/kg on day 8, 30 mg/kg on days 11 and 15, then weekly for 5 weeks, and then every 2 weeks) or placebo, venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg daily thereafter), and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); key secondary end points included complete remission (CR) rate and safety. After randomization of 378 patients, the trial was stopped at a prespecified interim analysis owing to futility. At final analysis, with median follow-up of 7.6 months (magrolimab arm) vs 7.4 months (control arm), median OS was 10.7 vs 14.1 months (hazard ratio, 1.178; 95% confidence interval, 0.848-1.637). The CR rate within 6 cycles was 41.3% vs 46.0%. Addition of magrolimab to venetoclax and azacitidine resulted in more fatal adverse events (19.0% vs 11.4%), primarily driven by grade 5 infections (11.1% vs 6.5%) and respiratory events (2.6% vs 0%). There were similar incidences of any-grade infections, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia between arms. These results highlight the difficulty in improving outcomes for patients with AML who were ineligible for IC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05079230.

Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We present results from ELEVATE-TN after a median follow-up of 74.5 months. Overall, 535 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab, n = 179; acalabrutinib, n = 179; chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, n = 177). Median age was 70 years, 63.0% had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (uIGHV), 13.6% had del(17p) and/or mutated TP53, and 17% had complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 chromosomal abnormalities). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib vs 27.8 months for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (both P < .0001); estimated 72-month overall PFS rates were 78.0%, 61.5%, and 17.2%, respectively. Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab resulted in improved PFS vs acalabrutinib monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P = .0229). Patients with uIGHV, del(17p) and/or mutated TP53, or CK had significantly improved PFS with acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (P < .0001, P ≤ .0009, and P < .0001 for both acalabrutinib-containing arms, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for all treatments, with significantly longer OS for acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab than chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (HR, 0.62; P = .0349). Estimated 72-month OS rates were 83.9%, 75.5%, and 74.7% for acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurring after >4 years were mostly grade 1 to 2. Rates of AEs, serious AEs, and events of clinical interest were similar between acalabrutinib-containing arms and consistent with the known safety profiles of acalabrutinib and obinutuzumab. Efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib-containing arms were maintained, with longer PFS in both acalabrutinib arms than chlorambucil-obinutuzumab including in patients with high-risk features. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02475681.

Rilzabrutinib is a covalent, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting multiple immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)-related mechanisms. The phase 3 LUNA3 study in previously treated adults with persistent/chronic ITP evaluated oral rilzabrutinib 400 mg twice daily (n = 133) vs placebo (n = 69) for 24 weeks. At baseline overall, median age was 47 years, 63% female, 7.7 year median ITP duration, and 28% prior splenectomy. Overall (N = 202), 85 (64%) rilzabrutinib and 22 (32%) placebo patients achieved platelet response (≥50 × 109/L or 30 × 109/L to <50 × 109/L and doubled from baseline) during the first 12 weeks and were eligible to continue. The primary end point, durable platelet response (platelet count ≥50 × 109/L for ≥two-thirds of ≥8 of the last 12 of 24 weeks without rescue therapy), was observed in 31 (23%) rilzabrutinib vs 0 placebo patients (P < .0001). All secondary efficacy end points were significantly superior for rilzabrutinib (P < .05). Median time to first platelet response was 15 days in rilzabrutinib responders. Rilzabrutinib significantly reduced rescue therapy use by 52% (P = .0007) and improved week 25 bleeding scores (P = .0006). Improved physical fatigue was sustained from week 13 (P = .01) through 25 (P = .0003). Treatment-related adverse events were mainly grade 1/2. One rilzabrutinib patient with multiple risk factors had serious treatment-related grade 3 peripheral embolism (lower left leg), and another died from unrelated pneumonia. Rilzabrutinib in patients who failed multiple previous ITP therapies showed rapid and durable platelet response, reduced rescue medication and bleeding, improved physical fatigue, and favorable safety. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04562766) and www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu (#2020-002063-60).