In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the evaluation of anatomic tumor extension [tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage] is indispensable for the exchange of scientific information or determining prognosis.

These guidelines for management of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma present evidence-based guidance for treatment, with identification of the strength of evidence available at the time of preparation of the guidelines, and a brief overview of epidemiological aspects, diagnosis and investigation.

This report presents guidelines for using low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in the management of patients with cervical cancer.

The 2001 NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines reflect the results of 5 generations of NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines. Evidence-based guidelines, such as the NNCN Breast Cancer Guidelines, are possible only because of the availability of high-level evidence at multiple decision points in treatment. The continued performance of high quality clinical trials is central to our ability to further improve the treatment of breast cancer. The panel believes that participation in high quality clinical trials is the preferred treatment at all points in breast cancer therapy.

The recommendations concerning tumor and bone marrow handling for the evaluation of molecular-biologic and molecular-genetic and immunologic markers presented in this paper were developed by the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Pathology and Biology and Bone Marrow Group. Although the Guidelines were developed for neuroblastic tumors (neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma), they are applicable to all other tumor entities as well. The paper is subdivided in three main parts. The Pathology Guidelines give an overview about the handling, sectioning and securing of tumor material in case of resectable and non-resectable neuroblastic tumors. The Guidelines encompass open biopsies, tru cut biopsies, fine needle aspirations, and bone marrow aspiration. The importance of the pathologic evaluation for the interpretation of the molecular-genetic and molecular-biologic results, which also includes the exact determination of the tumor cell content is stressed. Besides this, recommendations concerning tumor material obtained after cytotoxic therapy, immunohistologic and immuno-cytologic issues and lymph node examination are addressed. In the Biology Guidelines, the different methods for MYCN, chromosome 1p36 investigations and DNA content measurements are discussed and DNA probes are recommended. Furthermore, specified definitions and a common terminology already used in the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group are presented. In the Bone Marrow Guidelines, recommendations concerning the methods to be employed are given and the most important pitfalls are demonstrated. Both the use of standardized methods and the application of a common language will, it is hoped, contribute to the quality and reliability of collected data and thus to a better comparability between and among research reports. These improvements should prove to be of great value for the affected patients.

Approaches to the measurement of lymphohematopoietic chimerism have evolved from laboratory research to important clinical tools. However, there has been no logical, consistent, and uniform set of recommendations for the measurement of chimerism in clinical transplantation. The National Marrow Donor Program and the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) sponsored a workshop to discuss the use of chimerism analysis after allogeneic transplantation. The workshop was organized in an effort to make reasonable recommendations regarding laboratory techniques, the types of specimens to be studied, and the frequency of analysis. The panel recommended the following guidelines: 1. Chimerism analysis should use sensitive, informative techniques. At present, short tandem repeats (STR) or variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) analysis is the approach most likely to give reproducible informative data. 2. Peripheral blood cells are generally more useful than bone marrow cells for chimerism analysis. 3. Lineage-specific chimerism should be considered the assay of choice in the setting of nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning. 4. The use of T-cell depletion, nonmyeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning, or novel graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimens warrants chimerism analysis at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, because interventions such as donor lymphocyte infusions may depend on chimerism status. 5. In nonmyeloablative transplantation, the early patterns of chimerism may predict either GVHD or graft loss. Therefore, more frequent (every 2-4 weeks) peripheral blood analysis may be warranted. 6. For nonmalignant disorders, chimerism generally should be measured 1, 2, and 3 months after transplantation. Interventions to enhance donor engraftment must be considered on a disease-specific basis in relation to concurrent GVHD and, ultimately, clinical rationale.