Bronchial mucosa inflammation is a hallmark of asthma. Epithelial damage due to inflammatory process may contribute to induce a pattern of rapid and shallow breathing (RSB). Probably due to its effects on inflammatory process, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) decreases bronchial hypersensitivity (BH), as assessed in terms of histamine concentration causing a 20 percent FEV1 decrease from saline solution (PC20FEV1); however, no data are available on the effect of BDP on RSB. We studied 32 asymptomatic asthmatic subjects with a severe to moderate levels of BH (PC20FEV1 0.01 to 1.7 mg/ml). After they were randomly assigned to one month of either BDP (2 mg daily, 17 patients) or placebo (15 patients), they inhaled progressively doubling concentrations of histamine phosphate by tidal breathing method. With histamine in seven BDP-treated and in five placebo-treated patients, decrease in FEV1 > or = 20 percent from saline solution was paralleled by a significant decrease in tidal volume (VT), inspiratory time (Ti), and expiratory time (Te), and increase in respiratory frequency (RF). In the remaining patients, histamine failed to change the breathing pattern. In the seven RSB patients, BDP resulted in a smaller VT decrease (p < 0.02) and a smaller RF increase (p < 0.02) with histamine. The five RSB placebo-treated patients were then given one month BDP (2 mg daily): inhaled BDP, but not placebo, resulted both in a significant increase in PC20FEV1 and modulation in histamine-induced changes in breathing pattern. We conclude that high doses of BDP seem to be able to modulate histamine-induced RSB, an effect that might be linked to reversal of airway inflammation.

The efficacy of 8 weeks of treatment with 4 mg of nedocromil sodium 4 times daily in the management of partially reversible chronic airflow obstruction was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial at Repatriation General Hospital, Western Australia. Sixty-seven patients with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 0.99 L, which improved by 21.8 percent after beta 2-adrenergic bronchodilator, took part in the full 24-week study. After a 4-week run-in period, in addition to their regular therapy comprised of inhaled or oral bronchodilators and steroids (which remained unchanged), patients were randomly allocated to receive treatment with nedocromil sodium or placebo for 8 weeks. This was followed by a 4-week washout, and then the patients were given the alternative test treatment to that given in the first period for another 8 weeks. Compared with placebo, patients receiving nedocromil sodium had improvement in their morning and evening peak flow rates, symptom scores for cough, sleep disturbance, and overall treatment efficacy. Hence, treatment with nedocromil sodium should be considered for patients with partially reversible chronic airflow obstruction not fully controlled with bronchodilators and steroids.

The efficacy of ofloxacin, rifampicin and isoniazid was prospectively compared with the regimen of ethambutol, rifampicin and isoniazid for the primary treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in 124 patients. All drugs were given orally daily for nine months. Culture conversion rates three months after starting treatment were 98 percent in the ofloxacin group and 94 percent in the ethambutol group; by six months all patients in both groups were culture-negative. Significant radiological improvement of pulmonary infiltrates was observed in 83 percent of the ofloxacin group and 85 percent of the ethambutol group one year after starting treatment. No relapse in either group was observed during a two-year follow-up period after the cessation of chemotherapy. Ofloxacin appears to be as useful as ethambutol in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis when either drug is combined with isoniazid and rifampicin.

Undertreatment of chronic asthma may reflect uncertainty as to how it may be best controlled. We compared the effects of increased inhaled corticosteroid vs regular inhaled bronchodilator in 32 adult asthmatics. During three 16-week treatment periods, comprising baseline inhaled corticosteroid (mean 505 micrograms daily) and on-demand beta-agonist, baseline inhaled corticosteroid and increased (regularly scheduled four times daily) beta-agonist, and increased inhaled corticosteroid (mean 1478 micrograms daily) and on-demand beta-agonist, subjects recorded symptoms, morning and evening peak flow, and additional medication. Of 25 subjects whose control differed significantly between treatments with baseline vs increased corticosteroid, 22 (88 percent) favored the increased dosage (p < 0.001). Of 28 subjects whose control differed between treatments with regular beta-agonist vs increased corticosteroid, 24 (86 percent) were better controlled with increased inhaled corticosteroid and were worse with regular beta-agonist (p < 0.001). Only one quarter the number of exacerbations were experienced during treatment with increased inhaled corticosteroid. Upper airway adverse effects were minor and easily controlled. Hence, asthma with persistent symptoms was better controlled by increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy than by increased use of inhaled beta-agonist.

A generalized decision tree or clinical algorithm for treatment of high-risk elective surgical patients was developed from a physiologic model based on empirical data. First, a large data bank was used to do the following: (1) describe temporal hemodynamic and oxygen transport patterns that interrelate cardiac, pulmonary, and tissue perfusion functions in survivors and nonsurvivors; (2) define optimal therapeutic goals based on the supranormal oxygen transport values of high-risk postoperative survivors; (3) compare the relative effectiveness of alternative therapies in a wide variety of clinical and physiologic conditions; and (4) to develop criteria for titration of therapy to the endpoints of the supranormal optimal goals using cardiac index (CI), oxygen delivery (DO2), and oxygen consumption (VO2) as proxy outcome measures. Second, a general purpose algorithm was generated from these data and tested in preoperatively randomized clinical trials of high-risk surgical patients. Improved outcome was demonstrated with this generalized algorithm. The concept that the supranormal values represent compensations that have survival value has been corroborated by several other groups. We now propose a unique approach to refine the generalized algorithm to develop customized algorithms and individualized decision analysis for each patient's unique problems. The present article describes a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of artificial intelligence techniques to accomplish individualized algorithms that may further improve patient care and outcome.

Formoterol solution aerosol has proved to be a fast and long-acting beta 2-sympathicomimetic drug in many clinical trials. The physical stability, however, was such that storage needed to be at 4 degrees C to 8 degrees C before first use; afterwards, the aerosol could be used for another three months at room temperature. To improve the stability, new ways have been investigated to formulate ann aerosol with improved shelf life and thus more convenient storage conditions, which was reached with a formoterol suspension aerosol. Equivalent single doses between the two formulations revealed no differences in onset or duration of action. In a double-blind, randomized parallel group multicenter study, organized in the Netherlands, 186 patients with stable asthma and reversible airway obstruction were treated either with one puff of 12 micrograms twice daily of formoterol metered dose inhaler (MDI) supension (SP) or a same dose of solution (SL) aerosol for 12 weeks to study the efficacy and tolerability of both presentations after a longer period of use. The following criteria of effectiveness were used: the FEV1 values on the mornings of the control days at 0, +4, +8, and + 12 weeks, the peak flow values (PEF) in the mornings and in the evenings before, and 1/2 to 1 h after treatment, the number of asthma attacks at night and during the day, the number of extra puffs at night and during day, and the subjective impression of patients and investigator.

In a two-year randomized controlled study, we studied the effects of bronchodilator treatment on the lung function and the quality of life in patients with mild airflow obstruction. The patients were randomly divided to receive either continuous or symptomatic bronchodilator treatment. Within these treatment groups, they received salbutamol in the first year and ipratropium bromide in the second or vice versa. In addition, the quality of life of the patients was compared to that of the general population. One hundred and forty-four patients completed the study. When compared to the general population, these patients showed a serious impairment in quality of life. No differences between the two drugs were found, but the results indicated that FEV1 decline in the continuously treated group was significantly larger than in the symptomatically treated group. However, this was not reflected in a significant deterioration of the quality of life in the continuous group as measured by means of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Inventory of Subjective Health. Decline in FEV1 showed no correlation with changes in quality of life scores. This may be due to a relatively rapid adjustment of the patients to a decline in FEV1, as a result of which it has no direct effect on the experienced quality of life. Another reason may be that continuous bronchodilation masks the worsening of the disease. This lack of awareness might in turn be caused by the continuous symptom relief of bronchodilators.

To demonstrate the utility of pulse oximetry in detecting clinically unapparent episodes of arterial desaturation in postoperative cardiac surgical patients and to evaluate the effect of pulse oximetry on ordering arterial blood gas analyses.

In patients with asthma, the respiratory muscles have to overcome the increased resistance while they become progressively disadvantaged by hyperinflation. We hypothesized that increasing respiratory muscle strength and endurance with specific inspiratory muscle training (SIMT) would result in improvement in asthma symptoms in patients with asthma. Thirty patients with moderate to severe asthma were recruited into 2 groups; 15 patients received SIMT (group A) and 15 patients were assigned to the control group (group B) and got sham training in a double-blind group-comparative trial. The training was performed using a threshold inspiratory muscle trainer. Subjects of both groups trained five times a week, each session consisted of 1/2-h training, for six months. Inspiratory muscle strength, as expressed by the PImax at RV, increased significantly, from 84.0 +/- 4.3 to 107.0 +/- 4.8 cm H2O (p < 0.0001) and the respiratory muscle endurance, as expressed by the relationship between Pmpeak and PImax from 67.5 +/- 3.1 percent to 93.1 +/- 1.2 percent (p < 0.0001), in patients of group A, but not in patients of group B. This improvement was associated with significant improvements compared with baseline for asthma symptoms (nighttime asthma, p < 0.05; morning tightness, p < 0.05; daytime asthma, p < 0.01; cough, p < 0.005), inhaled B2 usage (p < 0.05), and the number of hospital (p < 0.05) and sick-leave (p < 0.05) days due to asthma. Five patients were able to stop taking oral/IM corticosteroids while on training and one in the placebo group. We conclude that SIMT, for six months, improves the inspiratory muscle strength and endurance, and results in improvement in asthma symptoms, hospitalizations for asthma, emergency department contact, absence from school or work, and medication consumption in patients with asthma.

We compared, in a controlled clinical trial, the effect of specific inspiratory muscle training combined with general exercise reconditioning, for six months, with that of general exercise reconditioning alone on inspiratory muscle strength, endurance, and exercise performance in patients with COPD. Thirty-six patients were recruited into three groups; 12 patients received specific inspiratory muscle training combined with general exercise reconditioning, 12 patients underwent general exercise reconditioning alone, and the remaining 12 patients received no training. Specific inspiratory muscle training, for six months, improved the inspiratory muscle strength and endurance in patients with COPD. This training combined with general exercise reconditioning also provided improvement in exercise tolerance, and this improvement was significantly greater than that of general exercise reconditioning alone.

To compare the thermal and humidification capacity of three heated hot water systems (HHWSs) and two heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) in ICU patients submitted to minute ventilation > 10 L/min.

The usefulness of the intravenous dipyridamole-echocardiography test (12-lead and two-dimensional [2-D] echo monitoring during dipyridamole infusion) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease recently has been suggested. However, the intravenous form of dipyridamole is not available for clinical use in some countries and therefore the administration of oral dipyridamole has been employed in combination with echocardiography. In order to evaluate the relative usefulness of the oral (300 mg of pulverized tablets) vs the intravenous (up to 0.84 mg/kg in 10 min) dipyridamole-echocardiography test, we performed the two tests, on different days and in random order, in 28 inhospital patients: 21 had coronary artery disease (seven had one-vessel disease, eight had two-vessel disease, and six had three-vessel disease); seven patients had no significant coronary artery disease. For both tests, the diagnostic end-point was the development of a transient dyssynergy of contraction. Sensitivity was 95 percent for the intravenous and 52 percent for the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test (p < 0.01); in positive cases, the dyssynergy after the dipyridamole administration appeared at 6.5 +/- 2.5 min for the intravenous and at 27.8 +/- 12.4 min for the oral test (p < 0.01). Specificity was 100 percent for both the intravenous and oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test. One or more extracardiac side effects (headache, gastrointestinal upset, flushing, etc) occurred in 61 percent of the intravenous and 68 percent of the oral tests (p = ns). Nine patients with a positive intravenous and oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test also had a positive exercise-electrocardiography test. A significant correlation between exercise time (ie, the time from onset of exercise and 0.1 m V of ST segment shift) and dipyridamole time (ie, the time from onset of dipyridamole administration and the development of frank dyssynergy) was present for the intravenous (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) but not for the oral test. We conclude that the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test, in comparison with the intravenous dipyridamole-echocardiography test, has a lower sensitivity and requires a substantially longer imaging time. The dipyridamole time is related to exercise time for intravenous but not for the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test.

The hemodynamic effects of a new orally active vasodilator, flosequinan, were compared with placebo (single blind) over 24 h in eight patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean pulmonary artery pressure was reduced by 5.1 (3.4, 6.7) mm Hg (mean 95 percent CI) (p < 0.003) and pulmonary vascular resistance was reduced by 70 (23, 189) dynes.s.cm-5 (p < 0.013) by active drug compared with placebo. Cardiac output increased significantly with flosequinan by 0.47 (0.03, 0.91) L/min (p < 0.04) and systemic oxygen delivery increased by 90 (50, 120) ml/min/m2) (p < 0.05). A significant reduction in systemic vascular resistance was observed, 132 (35,230) dynes.s.cm-5 (p < 0.02) but no significant changes were seen in systemic arterial blood pressure or arterial blood gas tensions. Flosequinan favorably altered pulmonary hemodynamics relative to systemic and resulted in a significant improvement in oxygen delivery. The hemodynamic and blood gas effects of this compound suggest that it is a promising vasodilator for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension.

To determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous cyclophosphamide for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Within hours, tolerance occurs to repeated methacholine challenge in normal subjects, and this study examines whether prostaglandin synthesis produces this phenomenon. On two separate study days, ten nonasthmatic non-smoking subjects with measurable baseline responsiveness to methacholine performed five sequential methacholine challenge tests over 6 h. Pretreatment before each day consisted of either placebo tablets or 50-mg tablets of indomethacin given three times daily for 48 h prior to testing. Medications were administered in a single-blind crossover fashion, with study days assigned in random order and separated by at least 1 wk. Methacholine challenge tests were summarized by the PD20FEV1 (the provocative dose in cumulative breath units [cbu] required to produce a 20 percent fall in FEV1). Indomethacin pretreatment had no effect on baseline spirometry between the two study days; however, the baseline geometric mean PD20FEV1 fell from 145 +/- 2 cbu (+/- percent SD) after placebo pretreatment to 65 +/- 1 cbu (+/- percent SD) on the indomethacin day (p = 0.046). This effect of indomethacin on baseline airway responsiveness persisted when an additional ten subjects were studied to further investigate this finding. Significant tolerance to repeated methacholine challenges occurred on both study days, with geometric mean PD20FEV1 rising approximately 16-fold (p less than 0.0001) regardless of pretreatment received. This study demonstrates that the attenuation of methacholine's effect with repeated testing is not due solely to prostaglandin synthesis and must involve, in part, other mechanisms, such as changes in methacholine deposition, agonist-receptor interactions, or postreceptor responses. In addition, prostaglandin inhibitors may increase baseline methacholine responsiveness in healthy nonasthmatic subjects.

Several reports have suggested that continuous intravenous administration of loop diuretics may be superior to intermittent administration. We performed a prospective randomized crossover study comparing intermittent intravenous administration (IA) of furosemide with continuous infusion following a single loading dose (LDCI) in nine patients with severe congestive heart failure. At the time of hospital admission, patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group (four patients) received an IV bolus injection of furosemide followed immediately by a continuous infusion for 48 h. The second group (five patients) was treated with three IV bolus injections a day for 48 h. Total doses of furosemide were equivalent in the two groups. After 48 h, each patient was crossed over to the other method and treated for an additional 48 h. LDCI produced significantly greater diuresis and natriuresis than IA (total urine output increased by 12 to 26 percent, total sodium excretion increased by 11 to 33 percent) (p less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in side effects between the two methods. These results indicate that LDCI may be a preferred method for administration of furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure.

A patient's tolerance of fiberoptic bronchoscopy depends on the effectiveness of local anesthesia. This study compares the three different methods of local anesthesia in common use After sedation, patients (n = 53) received either 4 ml of 2.5 percent cocaine by intratracheal injection (TI) (n = 18), by bronchoscopic injection (BI) (n = 19), or had 4 ml of 4 percent lidocaine delivered by nebulizer 20 min before the procedure (NEB) (n = 16). Patients and bronchoscopists scored the procedure using visual analog (VAS) and severity scales. Objective measurements of cough counts and episodes of stridor were recorded by phonopneumography. Patients' VAS scores showed a clear preference for the transtracheal method compared with either bronchoscopically injected cocaine (p less than 0.001) or nebulized lidocaine (p less than 0.001). Patients also reported that the TI method produced less cough during intubation of the larynx and inspection of the airways (BI and NEB, p less than 0.01). The TI method was also preferred by the bronchoscopists (BI and NEB, p less than 0.001); they reported less cough and easier tracheal intubation. The mean cough count was significantly lower for the TI group, 49 (43) compared with 95 (52) for BI (p less than 0.01), and 81 (43) for the NEB group (p less than 0.05). Patients' and bronchoscopists' VAS showed significant correlation with cough (r = 0.63-69, p less than 0.01). Stridor occurred in only two patients after TI, compared with 15 in the other two groups. Extra local anesthesia was required by 16 patients after BI, by all the NEB group, but by only one patient after TI. Subjective and objective measurement shows that 4 ml of 2.5 percent cocaine injected into the trachea produced excellent local anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy, there were no extra complications, and it was the method preferred by both patients and bronchoscopists.

In a recent study, it was suggested that the preservatives in ipratropium bromide nebulizer solution may cause a paradoxic bronchoconstrictor response in 20 percent or more of patients with stable asthma. The frequency of this response in patients with acute asthma is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of the usual dose of nebulized ipratropium bromide (0.25 mg) in patients with either stable or acute asthma using formulations with and without added preservatives. Twenty-five patients with stable asthma and 25 patients with acute asthma were studied. Each subject was given preservative-containing ipratropium bromide, preservative-free ipratropium bromide, pH 7 preservative-free ipratropium bromide, and saline solution in random order using a double-blind crossover technique with at least 4 h between drug administrations. Very frequent measurements of FEV1 were made for 30 min after each drug administration and then 5 mg of albuterol was nebulized and the FEV1 was measured again after another 30 min. Changes in FEV1 were expressed as a percentage of the predicted FEV1. Paradoxic bronchoconstriction to ipratropium was detected in only one patient with acute asthma (12 percent fall in FEV1) but in none of the patients with stable asthma. A 6 percent fall in FEV1 change occurred with the saline solution in this subject suggesting that the response may have been a nonspecific one due to increased bronchial responsiveness. The mean response (+/- 1 SD) to albuterol plus either preservative-containing ipratropium, preservative-free ipratropium, or pH7 preservative-free ipratropium was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than the response to albuterol alone both in the patients with acute asthma (25 +/- 12 percent, 27 +/- 15 percent, 26 +/- 15 percent, and 20 +/- 15 percent, respectively) and stable asthma (26 +/- 7 percent, 25 +/- 8 percent, 24 +/- 6 percent, and 22 +/- 9 percent) supporting the use of ipratropium bromide as an additional bronchodilator in patients with asthma who do not show a satisfactory response to nebulized beta-adrenergic agonist.

Chronic hypoxemia is associated with development of secondary polycythemia. To evaluate effects of transient hypoxemia on serum EPO activity in patients with chronic lung disease, we studied six oxygen-dependent patients who underwent either a 4-h oxygen withdrawal or their routine therapy, in a randomized, blinded fashion, on two separate days. Serum EPO did not differ at baseline between study days. Erythropoietin levels did not change significantly over time during normoxic conditions. Under hypoxic conditions, serum EPO levels rose over 4 h with the change from baseline first becoming significant at 2 h. The log of serum EPO response showed an inverse correlation with the level of arterial oxygen saturation. We conclude that patients with chronic lung disease are able to produce EPO in response to acute hypoxemic stress. Transient episodes of hypoxemia, such as occur during sleep or exercise, may result in increased red blood cell production stimulated by this EPO response.

It has been demonstrated recently that inhaled furosemide inhibits bronchoconstriction induced by cold air, physical exercise, various antigens, and metabisulfite. The goal of the present study was to determine if the inhalation of furosemide would inhibit the bronchoconstriction resulting from the inhalation of lysine-aspirin in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics. Six female subjects with known hypersensitivity to aspirin participated in this crossover study comparing 20 mg of inhaled furosemide and placebo. The volunteers inhaled increasing concentrations of lysine-aspirin after the inhalation of furosemide or placebo. The geometric mean provocative dose causing a 20 percent decrease in the FEV1 (PD20) after the inhalation of placebo was 30.4 mg/ml and the PD20 was equal or below 90 mg/ml in all patients. In contrast, the FEV1 did not decrease by 20 percent in any of the patients pretreated with furosemide when the inhaled concentration was increased to 360 mg/ml. From this study, we conclude that the administration of furosemide blocks the bronchospasm induced by the inhalation of lysine-aspirin in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics.