161. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.
作者: Sidney Winawer.;Robert Fletcher.;Douglas Rex.;John Bond.;Randall Burt.;Joseph Ferrucci.;Theodore Ganiats.;Theodore Levin.;Steven Woolf.;David Johnson.;Lynne Kirk.;Scott Litin.;Clifford Simmang.; .
来源: Gastroenterology. 2003年124卷2期544-60页
We have updated guidelines for screening for colorectal cancer. The original guidelines were prepared by a panel convened by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and published in 1997 under the sponsorship of a consortium of gastroenterology societies. Since then, much has changed, both in the research rature and in the clinical context. The present report summarizes new developments in this field and suggests how they should change practice. As with the previous version, these guidelines offer screening options and encourage the physician and patient to decide together which is the best approach for them. The guidelines also take into account not only the effectiveness of screening but also the risks, inconvenience, and cost of the various approaches. These guidelines differ from those published in 1997 in several ways: we recommend against rehydrating fecal occult blood tests; the screening interval for double contrast barium enema has been shortened to 5 years; colonoscopy is the preferred test for the diagnostic investigation of patients with findings on screening and for screening patients with a family history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; recommendations for people with a family history of colorectal cancer make greater use of risk stratification; and guidelines for genetic testing are included. Guidelines for surveillance are also included. Follow-up of postpolypectomy patients relies now on colonoscopy, and the first follow-up examination has been lengthened from 3 to 5 years for low-risk patients. If this were adopted nationally, surveillance resources could be shifted to screening and diagnosis. Promising new screening tests (virtual colonoscopy and tests for altered DNA in stool) are in development but are not yet ready for use outside of research studies. Despite a consensus among expert groups on the effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer, screening rates remain low. Improvement depends on changes in patients' attitudes, physicians' behaviors, insurance coverage, and the surveillance and reminder systems necessary to support screening programs.
167. The American Gastroenterological Association standards for office-based gastrointestinal endoscopy services.
The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) standards for office-based gastrointestinal endoscopy were written in response to market changes in physician reimbursements for many endoscopic procedures that will continue to drive their performance into unregulated physician offices. The AGA believes that patient safety is best protected if these standards are adopted by sites that also comply with state/federal laws for licensure or are certified as an ASC and/or are accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation program (e.g., the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization's [JCAHO] new Office-Based Surgery Standards). Heretofore, relevant practice standards for the performance of endoscopic procedures in these settings have not been available, a situation that the AGA believes puts patients at risk. These standards have been developed to reduce that risk.
170. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on constipation.
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on constipation. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee on March 4, 2000, and by the AGA Governing Board on May 21, 2000.
172. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on intestinal ischemia.
来源: Gastroenterology. 2000年118卷5期951-3页
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on intestinal ischemia. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee on September 25, 1999, and by the AGA Governing Board on November 15, 1999.
173. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
来源: Gastroenterology. 2000年118卷1期197-201页
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee on May 16, 1999, and by the AGA governing board on July 18, 1999.
174. AGA technical review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. American Gastroenterological Association.
This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee. The paper was approved by the Committee in March 1999 and by the AGA Governing Board in May 1999.
175. American gastroenterological association medical position statement: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
来源: Gastroenterology. 1999年117卷6期1463-84页
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee in March 1999 and by the AGA Governing Board in May 1999.
176. American gastroenterological association medical position statement on treatment of patients with dysphagia caused by benign disorders of the distal esophagus.
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on treatment of patients with dysphagia caused by benign disorders of the distal espophagus. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee on September 27, 1998, and by the AGA Governing Board on November 8, 1998.
177. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic diarrhea.
来源: Gastroenterology. 1999年116卷6期1461-3页
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Diarrhea. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee on September 27, 1998, and by the AGA Governing Board on November 8, 1998.
178. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. American Gastroenterological Association.
This document presents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) on Anorectal Testing Techniques. It was approved by the Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee on May 17, 1998, and by the AGA Governing Board on July 24, 1998.
|