Systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics, renal blood flow, and renal function were studied in 13 patients with cirrhosis both before and 1 h after oral administration of 40 mg of propranolol (acute administration) and 1 mo after continuous administration of this substance at doses reducing the heart rate by 25% (chronic administration). Cardiac output and the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures significantly decreased after acute and chronic administration of propranolol; mean arterial pressure did not change significantly and systemic vascular resistance significantly increased. Renal blood flow and renal vascular resistance did not change significantly after acute administration of propranolol and renal function did not change significantly after acute or chronic administration of propranolol. We conclude that propranolol does not alter renal function in patients with cirrhosis who are in good physical condition.

Twenty patients with chronic type B hepatitis were entered into a randomized, controlled study of adenine arabinoside monophosphate. Before entry, all patients were documented to have stable levels of hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B e antigen, serum hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid, and deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase activity. Ten patients received adenine arabinoside monophosphate and 10 received no treatment. The two groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, known duration of hepatitis B surface antigen, presence of symptoms, serum aminotransferase levels, and hepatic histopathology. During the 4 wk of therapy, serum levels of hepatitis B virus fell dramatically. However, serum hepatitis B virus-deoxynbonucleic acid or deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase activity, or both, remained detectable, and levels of hepatitis B virus invariably rose once therapy was stopped. From 2 to 9 mo after therapy, 4 of the 10 treated patients became hepatitis B e antigen or hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid and deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase negative, or both, and the results of routine serum biochemical tests improved. However, 2 of these 4 patients later relapsed. In the control group, 2 patients became seronegative for hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid and deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase and manifested improvement in serum biochemical results by 18-24 mo after randomization. Thus, long-term improvements in clinical and serologic features of disease occurred in 20% of both treated and control patients. Side effects of adenine arabinoside monophosphate therapy were common, and 3 patients developed a severe and prolonged neuropathic pain syndrome. These results suggest that a 4-wk course of adenine arabinoside monophosphate therapy does not induce an increased rate of long-term remissions in chronic type B hepatitis.

In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover, and randomized trial, the effect of 30, 60, and 90 mg of oral omeprazole on peptone-stimulated gastric acid secretion and synchronously measured gastrin release was studied in 8 healthy subjects. Peptone-stimulated acid output was reduced dose-dependently by 42%, 80%, and 92%, respectively. In spite of a short mean plasma half-life of 52 min, the inhibitory effect lasted for greater than 4.5 h and was significantly correlated to the area under the plasma concentration time curve for omeprazole. Mean basal serum gastrin and gastrin profiles increased insignificantly without alteration of integrated gastrin output and did not show any correlation either to the omeprazole area under the plasma concentration time curve or to the inhibition of peptone-stimulated acid secretion. Side effects, significant alterations of laboratory screen, or alterations of serum concentrations of thyroid hormones were not detected. In conclusion, omeprazole is a potent and, under the conditions tested, well-tolerated inhibitor of meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion in humans.

Eighteen patients with active Crohn's disease entered an open trial with 5-aminosalicylic acid in a slow-release preparation. All had lesions of the small bowel. Ten of them also had Crohn's disease of the colon. 5-Aminosalicylic acid, 500 mg three times daily, was administered for 6 wk. Even with meticulous monitoring, no side effects of any kind were observed, particularly no cases of renal affection, which could have been expected from animal studies. The clinical course was estimated as improved in 13 patients (72%), unchanged in 2 patients (11%), and aggravated in 3 patients (17%); 2 of these 3 were withdrawn from the study and switched to alternative treatment. The Crohn's disease activity index decreased from a median of 226 points to 99 points. On the basis of these results, large-scale controlled therapeutic trails seem warranted in order to establish clinical evidence for the benefit of peroral treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with Crohn's disease.

In a double-blind controlled study of ursodeoxycholic acid (400 and 800 mg/day) and chenodeoxycholic acid (375 and 750 mg/day), in comparison with placebo, ursodeoxycholic acid was significantly more effective than chenodeoxycholic acid in dissolving gallstones after 12 mo of treatment. Although there continued to be better dissolution during ursodeoxycholic acid treatment (dissolution complete in 30% and partial in another 30% of the patients) than during chenodeoxycholic acid treatment (dissolution complete in 7% and partial in 40%) at 24 mo, this difference between the treatment groups was no longer statistically significant. The incidence of floating stones was significantly higher in the patients who dissolved their stones than in those who did not (p less than 0.001). The three failures of dissolution of floating stones during bile acid treatment were associated with chenodeoxycholic acid therapy--two of them with the 750-mg and the third with the 375-mg doses. Gallstone dissolution with ursodeoxycholic acid occurred in spite of a rise in biliary cholesterol saturation, which was consistent with a nonmicellar mechanism of cholelitholysis. Furthermore, more than threefold serum elevations of L-alanine aminotransferase were observed only during chenodeoxycholic acid therapy. They occurred in 2 patients treated with 375 and 750 mg/day, respectively. The enzyme levels normalized after discontinuation of chenodeoxycholic acid and have remained normal for 13 and 8 mo, respectively, after the institution of treatment with 800 mg/day of ursodeoxycholic acid. There was no correlation between the liver tests and biliary levels of lithocholic acid. Of all the symptoms studied, only constipation showed changes that approached statistical significance (p = 0.0681). There was a significant improvement of constipation in the combined chenodeoxycholic acid groups when they were compared with the combined ursodeoxycholic acid groups. The total bile acid pool expanded significantly in both the chenodeoxycholic acid and in the 800-mg ursodeoxycholic acid treatment groups. The marked increases of biliary ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid, respectively, indicated compliance with the treatment in all but 1 bile acid-treated patient. Neither serum triglycerides nor serum cholesterol showed significant changes in any of the treatment groups. The study shows that ursodeoxycholic acid dissolves gallstones faster and with fewer side effects than chenodeoxycholic acid. The results of the study are also consistent with the view that ursodeoxycholic acid is cholelitholytic at a lower dose than is chenodeoxycholic acid.

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli cause most traveler's diarrhea in Third World countries. We tested bismuth subsalicylate as prophylactic therapy and as treatment for enterotoxigenic E. coli-induced diarrhea. Thirty-two healthy hospitalized volunteers were challenged orally with enterotoxigenic E. coli, strain H10407 (serotype 078:K80:H11). Administration of 600-mg doses of bismuth subsalicylate or placebo was begun 8 h before bacterial challenge. Doses were taken at 8 h and 2 h before, and at 2 h and 4 h after, the E. coli challenge and were continued four times a day for 3 additional days. The maximum prophylactic bismuth subsalicylate dose was 9.6 g. Those experiencing diarrhea were rerandomized to receive bismuth subsalicylate or placebo, given as 300 mg every 30 min for a total of 2.4 g of bismuth subsalicylate, in eight doses. Diarrhea occurred in 9 of the 16 (56%) subjects receiving placebo and in 2 of the 15 (13%) subjects receiving bismuth subsalicylate, p less than 0.03. This study confirms the effectiveness of bismuth subsalicylate in preventing traveler's (enterotoxigenic E. coli) diarrhea, and shows that bismuth subsalicylate in other than liquid form is effective. Enterotoxigenic E. coli were recovered less frequently from those receiving bismuth subsalicylate than from those receiving placebo, suggesting that bismuth subsalicylate prevents diarrhea by reducing the number or multiplication of enterotoxigenic E. coli. In vitro studies revealed that bismuth subsalicylate and its components each were bactericidal at concentrations possibly attained during the clinical trial.

This study was designed to compare the rates of duodenal ulcer healing and recurrence after treatment with cimetidine or antacid. Patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer received cimetidine, 1200 mg daily, or Mylanta II, 7 oz daily, in a randomized, double-blind trial. For the 69 patients in each group who completed the healing phase of the trial, endoscopic ulcer healing was almost identical. At 2, 4, and 6 wk, the cumulative percent healed on antacid was 33%, 64%, and 80%, and on cimetidine it was 25%, 62%, and 86%. The 114 patients with healed ulcer were observed on no therapy and underwent additional endoscopy to detect recurrences when symptomatic or at 3, 6, and 12 mo. There was no difference in the frequency of recurrences between treatments. At 3 and 6 mo, the cumulative percentages of patients with recurrence were 29% and 56% after antacid therapy and 36% and 55% after cimetidine therapy. Some patient variables were associated with delayed ulcer healing or ulcer recurrence. These included sex, pain frequency, smoking, disease duration, and acid secretion.

There are conflicting reports on the influence of cigarette smoking on healing in patients with duodenal ulcer; some studies show an adverse effect on healing rate and others no effect. This study reports the influence of smoking on short-term healing and relapse rate in 135 patients with duodenal ulcer who were treated with cimetidine (90), ranitidine (25), and oxmetidine (20), all powerful H2-receptor antagonists. Ulcer healing and relapse were documented endoscopically and all studies were performed in a double-blind manner. In the short term, 95% of nonsmokers healed compared with 63% smokers (p less than 0.01) and there was a positive correlation between failure to heal and number of cigarettes smoked. During a 12-mo follow-up examination after healing and on no treatment, 53% of nonsmokers and 84% of smokers relapsed (p less than 0.01). These results show that smoking adversely affects healing of duodenal ulcer with H2-receptor antagonists and that continued smoking leads to a higher relapse rate.

We have investigated the fasting and postprandial patterns of gastrointestinal pressure activity in a group of patients with extensive (greater than 100 cm) resections of the distal small bowel. Each short bowel patient was studied on 2 consecutive days with random single blind administration of either loperamide (6 mg at 5 h and at 30 min before the meal) or placebo, and 20 healthy controls were studied on single days (13 basal fasting, 7 placebo). During fasting, the duration of the interdigestive motor complex was significantly shorter in patients with short bowel syndrome (71.1 +/- 15.6 min vs. 109 +/- 7.8 min for controls, p less than 0.03); hence, the frequency of complexes was increased. The duration of phase 2 was strikingly shorter in patients (18.7 +/- 7.0 min vs. 52.9 +/- 8.5 min for controls, p less than 0.03). Gastric emptying and postprandial motor activity were identical in patients and controls. During fasting, loperamide prolonged phase 3 (7.6 +/- 2.2 min vs. 4.3 +/- 1.1 min for placebo, p less than 0.03). Postprandially, loperamide shortened the time from meal ingestion to the first phase 3 by 50% (p less than 0.003), and increased motility index and frequency of contraction in the gut (p less than 0.01). Thus, gut motor activity in the short bowel syndrome is characterized by more frequent interdigestive motor complexes, marked reduction in phase 2 activity, and a normal feeding pattern. Loperamide therapy increases feeding activity while at the same time shortening its duration.

In 42 consecutive adult patients with benign gastric ulcers, endoscopic biopsy specimens were examined histologically for infiltration with Candida albicans before the patients entered a double-blind trial of either cimetidine or placebo. Fifteen cases of candidal infiltration were found, giving an overall incidence of 36%. Repeated endoscopy after 6 wk showed complete ulcer healing in 9 of 15 patients with Candida-infiltrated ulcers, compared with 20 of 27 patients with no infiltration. It is concluded that the occurrence of Candida in benign gastric ulcers has no influence on the healing process.

Previous studies have shown that approximately 50% and 70% of duodenal ulcers heal after 2 and 4 wk, respectively, of cimetidine, and at least one-third heal after 4 wk of placebo. In order to identify these groups of ulcers before treatment, a two-phase study was performed, including an initial double-blind trial of cimetidine vs. placebo in 120 patients, and a subsequent open study with identical protocol of cimetidine vs. no cimetidine in another 60 patients. Forty clinical, personal, physiologic, and endoscopic characteristics were prospectively obtained in each patient, and were analyzed by stepwise discriminant analysis at the end of phase 1. This identified the discriminants against healing after 2 wk of cimetidine as late onset disease, body weight, and ulcer diameter; those after 4 wk of cimetidine as analgesic consumption, neurosis, low fasting serum gastrin, low pentagastrin D50 and ulcer diameter; and those after 4 wk of placebo as back pain, bleeding, and alcohol consumption. Based on the discriminant scores derived, the sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of prediction for complete healing as determined endoscopically were 74.4%, 90%, and 82.3% for 2-wk cimetidine, 100%, 87.5%, and 97.5% for 4-wk cimetidine, and 85.7%, 83.3%, and 84.2% for 4-wk placebo treatment. In phase 2, correct predictions were made in 36 of 40, 39 of 40, and 17 of 20 patients treated, respectively, for 2 and 4 wk with cimetidine, and 4 wk without cimetidine. Accurate prediction of duodenal-ulcer healing rate with and without cimetidine is thus possible by discriminant analysis. As many medical and surgical modalities of treatment are now available, this approach should have the potential of selecting the appropriate form of treatment for a given patient.

Sixty-six patients hospitalized for ulcerative colitis were treated in a prospective, double-blind, clinical trial. They received either 120 U/day of intravenous corticotropin or 300 mg/day of intravenous hydrocortisone. Patients were randomized within strata defined by whether they had received oral corticosteroids continuously for at least 30 days before the study (group A, 35 patients), or whether they had received no such prior treatment (group B, 31 patients). Twenty-eight of the 66 patients (42%) achieved remission. In group B, the proportion of patients entering remission was greater with corticotropin than with hydrocortisone (63% vs. 27%, 0.025 less than p less than 0.05). The opposite trend was observed within group A, for whom hydrocortisone appeared more effective (53% vs. 25%, 0.05 less than p less than 0.10). Impaired adrenal responsiveness, as measured by serum cortisol and dehydroepiandosterone-sulfate levels, did not explain the different responses to therapy within the two study groups. Twenty of 28 patients whose acute therapy was successful were still in remission 1 yr after study. These data suggest that, at the doses used, intravenous corticotropin therapy of severe ulcerative colitis is the more effective choice for those patients not previously treated with corticosteroids, while intravenous hydrocortisone seems preferable for patients already receiving steroid treatment.

The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of cimetidine in a dose of 400 mg twice daily in the prevention of gastric ulcer recurrence over a 2-yr period. The trial was double-blind and placebo-controlled; 24 patients received cimetidine and 25 received placebo. All had had a gastric ulcer within the prior 6 wk, and healing was demonstrated by endoscopy or by barium meal. The patients were contacted at monthly intervals, and if symptoms were present, investigations were performed. Annual barium meal examinations or endoscopy were also performed in all except 7 patients. In the placebo group, there was rapid recurrence within the first 12 mo; 12 of the 13 recurrences that occurred in this group over the 2-yr period took place within the first 12 mo. In the cimetidine-treated group, there were eight recurrences over the 2-yr period, five of which occurred in the first year. Log rank comparison showed a significant benefit due to cimetidine at 1 yr, but not over the 2-yr period.

The efficacy and safety of the new colonic lavage solution, Golytely (an electrolyte-polyethylene glycol solution), was compared with standard 2- and 3-day bowel preparations in a randomized blinded study of patients undergoing colonoscopy and barium enema examination. Side effects, patient preference, and quality of examinations were monitored. Colonoscopy was scored by colonic segment for type of residual stool and percentage of bowel wall visualized. Barium enema was graded by stool particle size in the least clean segment. For colonoscopy, preparation with Golytely allowed better visualization of colonic mucosa (p less than 0.002) due to less retained stool (p less than 0.002), produced more optimal exams (p less than 0.002), and required less time to reach the cecum (p less than 0.05). Furthermore, it was preferred by patients, required less than 5 preparation time, and caused no notable side effects. For barium enema, no significant difference existed between preparations. We conclude that Golytely is effective for barium enema examination and is the preparation of choice for colonoscopy.

Gastric emptying has been reported to be delayed in a significant percentage of patients with gastroesophageal reflux. The rationale for the use of metoclopramide and bethanechol in gastroesophageal reflux has been based on their ability to stimulate lower esophageal sphincter pressure and enhance acid clearance mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the comparative efficacies of metoclopramide and bethanchol in improving the rate of gastric emptying in gastroesophageal reflux patients in whom delayed emptying was present. Gastric emptying studies used an isotope-labeled mixed solid-liquid meal. Thirteen reflux patients with delayed gastric emptying received metoclopramide, 10 mg intramuscularly, and subcutaneous bethanechol, 0.07 mg/kg, in a randomized single-blind fashion. Eleven additional reflux patients with delayed gastric emptying received oral metoclopramide, 10 mg, in an open-labeled fashion. After parenteral metoclopramide, gastric emptying was significantly (p less than 0.05) faster compared with both the initial basal day and the bethanechol treatment day. Compared with the normal gastric emptying rate established in 26 control subjects, metoclopramide accelerated gastric emptying into the normal range. Bethanechol did not increase gastric emptying. Metoclopramide orally also significantly improved gastric emptying. Our study indicates that metoclopramide, both parenterally and orally, increased the rate of gastric emptying in those reflux esophagitis patients in whom it was delayed, while bethanechol did not improve the degree of gastric retention in the same patients. Our results extend the rationale for the therapeutic efficacy of metoclopramide in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Loop and distal diuretics are the basic drugs for the treatment of ascites. Although pharmacologic studies indicate that the natriuretic potency of loop diuretics is much greater than that of distal diuretics, there are no studies comparing the efficacy of these drugs in cirrhosis. Forty nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites and avid sodium retention were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 contained 21 patients treated with furosemide; group 2 contained 19 patients treated with spironolactone. The initial doses were 80 and 150 mg/day, respectively. These doses were increased to 160 and 300 mg/day, respectively, if there was no response. Cases not responding to furosemide and spironolactone were later treated with spironolactone and furosemide, respectively. In group 1, 11 of the 21 patients responded to furosemide, while in group 2, 18 of the 19 patients responded to spironolactone (p less than 0.01). Of the 10 patients in group 1 not responding to furosemide, 9 responded later to spironolactone. The diuretic response to furosemide and spironolactone was related to the activity of the renin-aldosterone system. Patients with higher renin and aldosterone did not respond to furosemide and required 300 mg/day of spironolactone to achieve a diuretic response. These results indicate that (a) at the dosages used in the study, spironolactone is more effective than furosemide in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites, and (b) the activity of the renin-aldosterone system influences the diuretic response to furosemide and spironolactone in these patients.