To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of nifedipine on anginal patients during exercise in the upright position, a placebo (P) and 20 mg of nifedipine were administered in a double-blind random sequence to ten patients presenting with exertional angina and a healed myocardial infarction. All patients had previously undergone coronary angiography. The effects of nifedipine in the upright position at rest, at the anginal threshold, and at the maximal level of exercise were studied. Nifedipine decreased systemic vascular resistances in upright position and increased the cardiac index. It reduced the severity of angina and allowed a higher physical work capacity without anginal symptoms. The most important beneficial effect of nifedipine appears to be the reduction in afterload, but an improvement of left ventricular function cannot be ruled out.

The effect of chewable isosorbide dinitrate on submaximal bicycle exercise capacity was evaluated in a double-blind randomized study involving 13 patients with chronic heart failure. All patients had impaired maximal exercise capacity (VO2 max = 12.0 +/- 2.6 ml/kg/min) due to fatigue and dyspnea but not angina. The administration of isosorbide dinitrate lowered the resting mean blood pressure (82 +/- 9. mm Hg to 78 +/- 10 mm Hg, (p less than 0.03)) and the resulting pulmonary wedge pressure (26 +/- 5 mm Hg to 12 +/- 6 mm Hg, (p less than 0.01)). Isosorbide dinitrate acutely improved exercise duration during upright bicycle exercise at a workload fixed at 50 percent of the maximal workload (placebo): 21.8 +/- 14.1 min vs isosorbide dinitrate: 31.4 +/- 13.6 min, (p less than 0.003)) due to reduced exertional dyspnea. Administration of chewable isosorbide dinitrate acutely improved submaximal exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure.

Theophylline is commonly prescribed for patients with nonasthmatic chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) even though clinical efficacy is not well established. We studied objective and subjective responses to theophylline in 14 men with CAO. Subjects randomly received week-long treatments of placebo or theophylline at two dosages: one that produced low (8.7-13.0 micrograms/ml) and the other high (16.0-23.6 micrograms/ml plasma concentrations. During the final three days of each treatment, we measured spirometric and hemodynamic function. Exercise tolerance was assessed with the 12 minute walk and progressive cycle ergometry. The patients' perception of breathlessness during the usual activities of daily living was evaluated with the oxygen cost diagram and the breathlessness rating. For low and high dose theophylline there were significant (p less than .05) increases in forced vital capacity (7.1 +/- 2.1 percent; 12.0 +/- 1.7 percent), forced expiratory volume at one second (14.6 +/- 4.9 percent; 12.1 +/- 3.3 percent) and in pulse rate (8.3 +/- 1.2 percent; 19.1 +/- 3.1 percent), but no changes in blood pressure. There were also no significant differences among the three treatments for any of the tests which assessed exercise tolerance or breathlessness. These results suggest that most patients with CAO experience little symptomatic benefit from taking theophylline.

Patients with culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were allocated at random into two groups for a three-phase regimen in original course chemotherapy. The first group was given rifampicin (RMP) plus isoniazid (INH) plus ethambutol until sensitivity tests were completed, then RMP plus INH until culture conversion, thereafter INH alone for four months. The second group received the same drugs until obtaining culture conversion, thereafter IHN alone for a period lasting two years after onset of chemotherapy. One hundred sixty-eight patients were available for the final assessment after a five-year follow-up after culture conversion. Two bacteriologic relapses occurred among the two-year scheme patients, none in the short-course patients.

In two groups of patients, 15 with asthma and 15 with chronic bronchitis, the bronchodilator effects of ipratropium bromide, of fenoterol plus theophylline, and of the combination of the three drugs, were compared using a double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled format. Ipratropium bromide caused rapid bronchodilatation which was not significantly different in asthmatic patients and patients with bronchitis (delta FEV1 = .29 L in one hour in asthmatic patients, .18 L in patients with bronchitis). In contrast, fenoterol plus theophylline induced a considerably greater effect in asthmatic patients (delta FEV1 = .41 L in one hour) than in those with bronchitis (delta FEV1 = .07 in one hour). The use of the three drugs in combination compared with ipratropium bromide alone, or fenoterol plus theophylline alone, resulted in a significant additional bronchodilatation in asthmatic patients. In the patients with bronchitis, the triple combination was clearly superior to fenoterol plus theophylline. A similar trend was present in comparing the triple combination to ipratropium bromide, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no evidence of synergism when ipratropium bromide was combined with fenoterol plus theophylline in that the total bronchodilator effect was approximately additive. Asthmatic patients and the physician were able to distinguish the triple combination from placebo. No such ability was demonstrated with respect to those with bronchitis. All three drugs were well tolerated. Side effects were mostly mild, and none was related to the use of ipratropium.

We evaluated the effectiveness of oral verapamil therapy for control of ventricular rate in digitalized patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with three clinical problems: chronic AF with rapid rate at rest (four patients), chronic AF with accelerated rate during modest exercise (five patients), and rapid rates during paroxysmal AF (four patients). Patients in the first two categories were evaluated both by open-label dosage titration and by a randomized, double-blind, cross-over protocol. In chronic AF with rapid rate of rest, there was a significant reduction in resting heart rate (from 125 +/- 7 to 87 +/- 14, P less than 0.01) and in peak exercise heart rate (from 162 +/- 33 to 126 +/- 25, P less than 0.01). In chronic AF with rapid rate during exercise, there was also a significant decrease in resting heart rate (from 90 +/- 7 to 66 +/- 4, P less than 0.01) and in peak exercise heart rate (from 126 +/- 19 to 101 +/- 15, P less than 0.01). These effects continued during longterm follow-up of one to 12 months (mean seven months). In patients with paroxysmal AF, verapamil slowed the ventricular response from 16- +/- 24 to 72 +/- 4 P less than 0.01) with only some amelioration of symptoms. Therapy was well tolerated despite a high prevalence (seven of 13 patients) of radiographic cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio greater than 0.55). We conclude that verapamil is a safe and useful drug for control of ventricular rate in digitalized patients with chronic and paroxysmal AF.

Triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (TAA) and a placebo aerosol were compared in a six-week, double-blind multicenter study. Ninety-six steroid-independent asthmatic patients were randomized into two parallel groups. Each patient was evaluated weekly. After four weeks of treatment, those patients treated with TAA showed highly significant (P less than 0.001) improvement from baseline in pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, and FEF25-75%) and in asthmatic symptoms, whereas no significant improvement was observed in those patients who received placebo aerosol. In the TAA-treated patients, 78 percent were rated wtih an excellent or good response, compared with 24 percent in the placebo patients. During the subsequent one-week washout period, mean pulmonary function test values of the TAA-treated group were significantly reduced (P less than 0.0001). Eighty-eight patients continued into the one-year, open-label phase of the study. Highly significant (P less than 0.001) improvement from baseline was observed in pulmonary function tests and in asthmatic symptoms at each bimonthly evaluation during the 12-month segment. Mean plasma-cortisol level changes were not statistically significant. At the end of the long-term study, the performance of TAA was subjectively rated by the investigators (excellent or good in 92 percent of the patients) and by the patients (excellent or good in 89 percent). Mild-to-moderate adverse reactions (sore throat, hoarseness) were reported by six patients during the six-week phase and by ten patients during the 12-month phase. Thus, TAA was a safe and effective treatment in this series of bronchial asthma patients.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of flunisolide aerosol prescribed as .5 mg (two inhalations) twice daily and placebo in terms of oral steroid sparing ability in a population of 32 known steroid-dependent children and adolescents. Patients were stabilized on the lowest tolerated dose of daily AM or alternate AM oral corticosteroid for at least one month before entering the study. They were randomly assigned to either flunisolide or placebo treatment for the 12-week, double-blind trial. Patients were seen every two weeks for symptom assessment, physical examination, and pulmonary function testing. Tests of adrenal function were done initially and at the study's conclusion. The flunisolide group had improved asthma control compared with the placebo group. The daily oral steroid requirement decreased in 100 percent of the flunisolide group compared with 53 percent of the placebo group (P less than .01). Pulmonary function and endocrine function remained stable for both groups. There were no adverse effects. Flunisolide aerosol in doses of .5 mg twice daily appears to be topically active and to have oral steroid potential without apparent adverse effects.

Nadolol, a new nonselective beta 1 and beta 2 adrenergic blocking agent, has a plasma half-life of 17 to 23 hours. We studied 37 volunteers with stable angina pectoris who had five or more episodes of pain per week and who also had a 1 mm or greater ST segment depression 80 msec past the J point during a Bruce protocol treadmill test. An eight-week placebo controlled run-in period preceded double-blind randomization to nadolol administered once per day (17 patients) or identical appearing placebo for four weeks (20 patients), after which an exercise test was done. Diaries for pain episodes and nitroglycerin consumption were kept. Exercise tests were performed 24 hours after the last nadolol or placebo dose. Episodes of pain per week were reduced 59.8 percent after nadolol and 28.2 percent after placebo (P less than .01). Nitroglycerin consumption after nadolol was reduced 66.8 percent while after placebo it was reduced 36.2 percent (P less than .05). Resting and peak heart rates and peak rate-pressure products showed typical reductions due to beta-blockade 24 hours after nadolol compared with stability of these during placebo, all P less than .001. Exercise time after nadolol increased 42.2 percent, which was more than the 14.5 percent increase after placebo (P less than .05). Exercise work after nadolol increased 64.7 percent, greater than the 22 percent increase after placebo (P less than .05). Mean ST segment depression at end of exercise was little changed before and after treatment in both groups, reflecting consistency of effort. Improvement in symptoms and work capacity associated with nadolol significantly exceeded the placebo group responses. Unlike other available agents of this class, a single daily dose of nadolol produced therapeutically effective 24-hour beta-blockade in patients with disabling angina pectoris.

To examine the additive properties and the sites of action of inhaled atropine sulfate (0.05 mg/kg of body weight) and terbutaline sulfate (0.005 mg/kg) in patients with chronic airflow obstruction, we tested these aerosols separately and together in a double-blind random sequence. Twelve patients with chronic bronchitis and perennial obstruction of airflow were studied by measuring three indices of efficacy (specific airway conductance [Gaw/VL], the forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and the forced vital capacity [FVC]) and three indices of the site of action within the airway (delta [(Gaw/VL)/FEV1], the difference between the change in forced expiratory flow at 75 percent of vital capacity and the change in forced expiratory flow at 25 percent of vital capacity, and the change in density dependence of maximal airflow at 50 percent of vital capacity). Both atropine and the combination of atropine and terbutaline improved all indices of efficacy significantly more than did terbutaline. With individual exceptions, the addition of terbutaline to atropine improved Gaw/VL but not forced airflow. All measures of site of action suggested an advantage for atropine in relatively proximal airways. These results indicate that combined therapy with beta-adrenergic and anticholinergic bronchodilator drugs is marginally more effective than therapy with atropine alone in these patients and suggest that anticholinergic aerosols dilate larger airways more effectively than the beta-agonists.

We studied the effect of a single oral dose of 40 mg of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) on the exercise capacity of ten patients with angina pectoris. The study design was a randomized double-blind crossover comparing the effects of 40 mg of oral PETN with placebo on exercise tolerance. Patients were exercised to moderate angina pectoris before and 2 1/2 and 4 1/2 hours after receiving the placebo or PETN at seven-day intervals during the double-blind crossover period. Exercise tolerance time was measured using a multistage, progressive treadmill test. Exercise times were greater 2 1/2 hours and 4 1/2 hours following PETN compared with placebo (P less than 0.05). Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and double product at rest (supine and standing) and at point of angina pectoris did not change significantly.

Six asthmatic children were studied to determine whether supplemental, parenteral atropine would increase the effects of bronchodilation and protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction after maximal effects had been achieved by inhalation. First, we determined the amount of inhaled atropine sulfate that would give maximal bronchodilation for each patient at rest. This quantity of atropine was designated as "A." Then all subjects exercised for five sessions with the following pre-exercise treatments in a random order: (a) inhaled distilled water plus intramuscular (IM) saline solution; (b) inhaled A dose of atropine plus IM saline solution; (c) inhaled distilled water plus 0.35 mg IM atropine; (d) inhaled A dose of atropine plus 0.35 mg IM atropine; and (e) inhaled double the A dose plus IM saline solution. The results showed that the combination of inhaled and IM atropine had the greatest bronchodilation effect and the greatest protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Atropine inhalation alone (A dose) or IM injection (0.35 mg) was not as effective in bronchodilation or in alleviation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Doubling the dose of inhalation (2A) did not increase the effects of the A dose. These results support the hypothesis that inhaled atropine does not reach all the airways where cholinergic receptors are present.

With the objectives of improving response rate, duration of response, and survival in small-cell carcinoma of the lung, 39 patients were randomized to remission-induction with either one of two potentially non-cross-resistant drug combinations: APE (consisting of adriamycin, 35 mg/m2 IV, D1 Q 3 weeks; procarbazine, 60 mg/m2 PO, D1-10 Q 3 weeks; and the epipodophyllotoxin (VP16-213), 130 mg/m2 IV, D8, 15 Q 3 weeks) or MOCC (composed of methotrexate, 15 mg/m2 IV (with [vincristine] Oncovin) or PO twice weekly D8-21 Q 3 weeks; Oncovin, 1.5 mg/m2 IV, D8, 15 Q 3 weeks; cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 IV, D1 Q 3 weeks, and CCNU, 60 mg/m2 PO Q 6 weeks). A fixed crossover to the alternate regimen occurred at three months. Radiotherapy was delivered to the primary tumor (locoregional disease only) by a split course technique (1,750 rads for five days with a three-week split, followed by 3,400 rads over 17 days). The median survival including both arms was 11 months for regional and nine months for extensive disease. The chemotherapeutic activity of both regimens was comparable, with 15/17 (88 percent) of the patients responding to APE (including six complete) and 14/17 (82 percent) responding to MOCC (including five complete). The median survival for the complete responders was 11.7 months, while the partial responders survived for a median of 9.7 months. There were 2/9 (22 percent) responders to the alternate regimen at progressive disease. The overall incidence of CNS progression was 17 percent. The toxicity of the regimens was moderate, except for one instance of granulocytopenic death. This study establishes two equipotent drug combinations for the treatment of small-cell carcinoma of the lung.

Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of methylprednisolone were investigated in a double-blind study of 28 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), confirmed by unequivocal electrocardiographic and enzyme changes. Measurements were performed prior to and at 1.5, 3, 4, 4.5, 12 and 24 hours following infusion of methylprednisolone (13 patients) or placebo (15 patients). Although systemic vascular resistance decreased from 1,750 to 1,420 dynes . sec . cm-5 (p less than .001) and cardiac index increased from 2.77 to 3.10 L/min/m2 (p less than .02) between 0 and 4.5 hours, an abnormal increase in blood lactate was observed in 10 of the 13 patients following administration of methylprednisolone (3.0 vs 1.2 mM/L, p less than .001). Lactate elevation appeared one hour after infusion of methylprednisolone, was maximal at 12 hours, and persisted for more than 24 hours. There was no significant change in blood lactate in placebo treated patients. A transient but significant decrease in plasma volume was also observed following infusions of methylprednisolone. The elevation of blood lactate could not be explained by the reduction in plasma volume since the most striking increases in lactate were observed 12 hours following the initial infusion of methylprednisolone when the plasma volume was returning to the control value. No significant differences in other hemodynamic or metabolic parameters, infarct size or patient survival were observed between the two groups. We conclude that the hemodynamic benefits of glucocorticoids characterized by increased cardiac output and lowered systemic vascular resistance are counterbalanced by the potentially unfavorable conditions of lactate elevation and volume depletion.

Although diltiazem has been shown to alleviate vasospastic angina pectoris, its effect on exercise-inducible chronic stable angina has not been objectively studied. Accordingly, the effect of diltiazem was studied in this condition with a placebo controlled double-blind randomized cross-over protocol at three dose levels (120, 180 and 240 mg/day) during graded treadmill exercise. Three end-points were evaluated: 1) time to onset of angina or fatigue if angina were eliminated; 2) time to 1 mm ST segment depression or fatigue if ST depression were eliminated; and 3) time to termination of exercise (2+ angina or fatigue). All end-points were prolonged at all dose levels. At the highest dose of 240 mg/day, time to onset angina or termination was prolonged from a placebo time of 8.0 +/ 0.9 to 9.8 +/- 0.9 minutes (p = < .001); time to ST depression or termination was prolonged from 7.8 +/- 0.9 to 9.1 +/- 0.8 minutes (p = .007); and time to termination was prolonged from 9.9 +/- 0.9 to 10.8 +/- 0.8 minutes (p = .02).

Medical therapy for Prinzmetal's variant angina has been treatment of the acute attack with sublingual nitroglycerin. Prophylactic therapy has been more difficult, utilizing long-acting vasodilators that are limited because of their short half-life and side effects when therapeutic doses are used. Alpha-adrenergic blockade has been effective in some patients but is frequently associated with intolerable side effects or apparent development of tolerance to the drug. Preliminary experience from a randomized double-blind trial of diltiazem, a new calcium antagonist, has demonstrated a 90% reduction in pain episodes, with many patients becoming pain-free on the 240-mg daily dose. These data and the lack of adverse side effects demonstrate a dramatically effective therapy for patients with coronary artery spasm.

A study was undertaken to compare the use of three types of deep-breathing devices in patients undergoing upper-abdominal operations. Seventy-nine patients were divided into three groups, each receiving preoperative bedside testing of pulmonary function and instruction in the use of one of three randomly assigned deep-breathing devices thought to be representative of those currently available (Triflo II, Bartlett-Edwards Incentive Spirometer, or Spirocare). Repeat testing and instruction were provided daily during each of the first five postoperative days. There were few statistically significant differences in pulmonary function, vital signs and white blood cell count, and no difference in length of postoperative stay. No device was uniformly acceptable to patients, and none was used as frequently as recommended. When left at the bedside and only one daily reinforcement of instructions, the three devices showed no clinically important differences.

Change in the magnitude of density dependence of the maximal expiratory flow (D/MEF) following inhalation of isoproterenol was used as a test for predicting the long term response to isoproterenol vs atropine in 24 adult patients with longstanding asthma. Eleven subjects showed a decrease in D/MEF manifested by increase in volume of isoflow (VisoV) and/or decrease in Vmax50 Helox/air following isoproterenol inhalation (group 1). Thirteen subjects manifested an opposite response (group 2). Atropine sulphate (0.08 mg/kg) and isoproterenol hydrochloride (2.5 mg) were then administered by inhalation, each four times a day for seven days in a randomized double-blind cross over fashion to all subjects. One of group 1 but ten of group 2 subjects had a greater subjective and objective improvement with atropine than with isoproterenol (P less than .005). An increase in D/MEF following isoproterenol can be used as a test to predict a better response to atropine than to isoproterenol over a one week period. Such a response occurs in almost half of the adult chronic asthmatic patients. The results are consistent with a preferential dilatation of the large airways by atropine.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether long-term oral administration of commonly prescribed doses of quinidine sulfate and procainamide hydrochloride to patients with ischemic heart disease affects myocardial contractility. Segmental contractility, assessed by the systolic shortening fraction, the relative change in interclip distance from diastole to systole, was measured by cineradiography of metal clips that had been sutured to the epicardium at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery. Global contractility was assessed by gated blood-pool scintigraphy. Systolic shortening fraction determinations and scintigraphy were obtained following five to seven days' administration of procainamide (500 mg every four hours), quinidine (200 mg every six hours), or neither drug in a random sequence. Serum drug levels (milligrams per liter) were 1.8 +/- 0.8 (mean +/- 1 SD) for quinidine and 3.7 +/- 1.1 for procainamide, when measured one hour before the next dose. During quinidine administration, mean segment shortening fraction decreased only slightly, but significantly (P less than 0.02), from 12.4 percent to 10.6 percent. The clinical importance of so small a change is questionable. During procainamide administration, there was a very small, insignificant (P greater than 0.9), decrease in segmental shortening. Global left ventricular function was not significantly changed by either drug. It appears that both drugs can be used over long periods in commonly prescribed doses in patients with ischemic heart disease without a major overall deleterious effect on cardiac performance.

Because atelectasis of the left lower lobe is a frequent complication of open heart surgery, we evaluated the efficacy of routine therapy with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent this complication. Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to either a group receiving therapy with PEEP (ten patients) or to a group with no PEEP (14 patients). The two groups could not be distinguished by age, weight, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the ratio of FEV1 over the forced vital capacity, the time on the pump, the units of blood transfused, the tidal volume, or the hours of mechanical ventilation. There was no significant roentgenographic difference between the two groups in either the degree or frequency of left lower lobe atelectasis. While the arterial-alveolar ratios tended to improve over time in those patients receiving therapy with PEEP, this improvement was not clinically significant. No complications were encountered with the use of PEEP. We conclude that the routine use of PEEP following open heart surgery is safe but offers no advantage over standard ventilatory techniques.