Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) combined with cetuximab (for cisplatin-ineligible patients) is the standard of care (SoC) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). This study investigates whether adding programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to standard therapy improves survival in patients with LA-HNSCC.

BackgroundCardiac damage is a significant risk of chemotherapy. Elevated circulating cardiac troponin I was suggested as a marker for early detection of cardiac damage.ObjectiveWe aim to assess the predictive value of cardiac troponin I for chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in cancer patients.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CNKI. Nine prospective studies involving 2033 cancer patients (pts) were included in the meta-analysis. Troponin I (TnI) levels in patients who underwent chemotherapy were categorized into cardiac troponin I (cTnI) positive and negative groups based on the cutoff concentrations described in the included studies. The cumulative effects of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity between the cTnI-positive and cTnI-negative patients were represented as a summarized risk difference (RD) value with a 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were employed to address heterogeneities. Stata software (version 12.0) was utilized for the analysis.ResultscTnI-positive pts represented significant cardiotoxicity compared to cTnI-negative pts, as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): RD = 0.279 [95% CI (0.248-0.311), p = 0.000, I2 = 81.3%, 8 trials], heart failure (HF): RD = 0.117, [95% CI (0.090-0.144), p = 0.000, I2 = 77.8%, 6 trials], arrhythmias: RD = 0.057 [95% CI (0.028-0.086), p = 0.000, I2 = 0.0%, 3 trials], and cumulative events: RD = 0.318 [95% CI (0.272-0.364), p = 0.000, I2 = 73.5%, 3 trials]. No statistically significant difference in cardiac death, acute pulmonary edema, and acute coronary syndromes between cTnI-positive pts and cTnI-negative pts was identified.ConclusionsAn increase in circulating troponin I serve as a potential biomarker that reflecting the high risk of early cardiotoxicity in cancer patients who have undergone chemotherapy. The presence of intrinsic unadjusted confounding factors in the reports suggests the need for further study to address this question.

To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Metastatic or recurrent bone sarcomas are often associated with an unfavorable prognosis, posing a formidable challenge in extending patients' survival. Currently, regorafenib has shown promise in treating metastatic and recurrent bone sarcomas. However, there is a lack of consensus on its efficacy and safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to consolidate existing data to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in bone sarcomas.

Ototoxicity is a known side effect of cisplatin chemotherapy. The efficacy of various medications used to prevent or reduce ototoxicity in adults receiving cisplatin has not been thoroughly described in the literature.

The combination of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors with chemotherapy (CT) is currently under evaluation as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic combination in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

Despite durable responses achieved with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), data about optimal duration of treatment, especially in the context of adverse events, remain scarce.

Based on the existing controversial clinical research results, this study conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of relevant literature to clarify the benefits of immunochemotherapy (ICT)-which combines immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy (CT)-for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC).

Cannabinoids have potential efficacy as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), but no recent meta-analysis has reported on their relative efficacy compared to other antiemetics. The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the relative efficacy of cannabinoids for prophylaxis of CINV.

Targeted therapies are promising treatment options for fit patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, there is a lack of data on their relative efficacy and safety. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the relative efficacy and safety of first-line targeted therapies (including venetoclax [VEN], obinutuzumab [OBI], ibrutinib [IBR], and other options) for physically fit patients with untreated CLL.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant efficacy in treating various malignancies and have become a key therapeutic approach in cancer treatment. However, while ICIs activate the immune system, they can also induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to the variability in the frequency and severity of irAEs, clinical management faces a significant challenge in balancing antitumor efficacy with the risk of irAEs. Predicting and preventing irAEs during the early stages of treatment has become a critical research focus in cancer immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of peripheral blood cell counts for irAEs.

Exercise can improve the symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses of exercise interventions can only identify the difference in effect between an exercise intervention and usual care. It is necessary to conduct network meta-analyses to establish evidence on the comparative effectiveness of all relevant exercise intervention strategies.

Antibody-drug conjugates are novel effective therapies for metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, their toxicity profile can significantly affect patients' quality of life over time.

Anthracycline-based chemotherapy, such as Doxorubicin (DOX), often induces cardiotoxicity in cancer patients, which compromises their health and quality of life.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) has been endorsed by clinical guidelines for the management of DNA mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Nonetheless, the therapeutic efficacy of NIT in mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) remain pending matters. Therefore, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of NIT in patients with non-metastatic pMMR/MSS RC.

IntroductionThis study aims to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab treatment on the incidence of hypertension in patients with ovarian cancer.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted until August 2024. We included only randomized clinical trials that compared ovarian cancer patients treated with Bevacizumab to those treated with other therapies. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of developing hypertension, stratified by grade. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on hypertension severity (grade ≥2 and grade ≥3) and disease stage. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were also performed.ResultsA total of 11 randomized trials were included, comprising 5212 patients. The meta-analysis revealed that patients receiving Bevacizumab had a significantly higher risk of hypertension compared to controls (RR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.65-5.16, P = 0.0002). Subgroup analysis showed that the risk of grade ≥2 hypertension was 1.68 times higher (95% CI: 0.92-3.07), and grade ≥3 hypertension was 5.10 times higher (95% CI: 2.46-10.55) in the Bevacizumab group. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected.ConclusionBevacizumab treatment in ovarian cancer significantly increases the risk of hypertension, particularly severe hypertension (grade ≥3). These findings underscore the need for vigilant blood pressure monitoring and management in patients receiving Bevacizumab to mitigate cardiovascular complications and optimize treatment outcomes.

To evaluate the role of carboplatin-based chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with malignant gonadal germ cell tumors (GCTs), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials or cohort studies on gonadal GCTs between January 1, 1970 and April 26, 2023 were enrolled. The treatment failure rate and mortality rate were the primary outcomes. Subgroup analysis based on the primary tumor site and dose of carboplatin was also conducted. In total, 8 studies with 1,409 patients were included. Compared to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, carboplatin-based chemotherapy had an increased treatment failure rate (odds ratio [OR]=2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.61-3.08; p<0.001), but similar overall survival outcomes (OR=1.68; 95% CI=0.61-4.61; p=0.315). Subgroup analysis revealed that carboplatin-based chemotherapy did not increase the risk of treatment failure and death in ovarian GCT, while a higher risk of treatment failure and a similar risk of death were observed in testicular GCT. Patients treated with high-dose carboplatin calculated 400 or 600 mg/m² (area under the curve=7.9) obtained similar failure-free survival to the cisplatin group (OR=0.84; 95% CI=0.40-1.73; p=0.629). Compared to the cisplatin group, milder nausea and vomiting, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and more severe myelosuppression were observed in the carboplatin group. In conclusion, carboplatin-based chemotherapy achieves a comparable overall survival outcome to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in gonadal GCT patients, suggesting that carboplatin is a candidate substitute for cisplatin. The efficacy of carboplatin is dose-dependent. High-dose carboplatin can obtain better therapeutic effects with more tolerable toxicities than cisplatin.

Povidone-iodine (PI) is the gold standard for pre-intravitreal injection ocular antisepsis. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is an emerging alternative with less ocular irritation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate post-injection endophthalmitis rates with the use of CHX compared to PI. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed for studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 21, 2024. Data on the number of injections and endophthalmitis cases were analyzed. A sample-size weighted mean difference (MD) meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Five studies including 230,656 injections were pooled to determine an endophthalmitis rate of 0.0003 [95 % CI, 0.0001-0.0005] with preinjection CHX antisepsis. Three studies included an additional PI branch and thus were used for secondary meta-analysis comparing CHX against PI. The analysis consisted of 185,799 injections in the CHX group and 269,441 injections in the PI group. No significant difference in the weighted relative risk of endophthalmitis with CHX was found (RR = 1.27 [95 %CI 0.50-3.22], p = 0.62). A total of 24 and 31 cases of culture-positivity were recorded in the CHX and PI groups respectively but no significant difference in weighted means was found (RR = 1.42[95 %CI 0.96-2.12], p = 0.08). This meta-analysis disclosed that the rate of post-IVI endophthalmitis while using CHX antisepsis is approximately 1 in 3937 injections, compared to 1 in 3906 with PI. CHX was not associated with a significant difference in the rate of endophthalmitis or culture-positivity compared to PI.

This study aimed to quantify the impact of chemotherapy on attention function, assessed by neuro-psychological tests and to identify the time point of impact.

The clinical efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs), corticosteroids, and their combined treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has been substantiated by numerous studies. However, it remains uncertain whether the therapeutic benefits of the combined treatment with corticosteroids and anti-VEGFs is superior to those of anti-VEGF monotherapy. Consequently, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with dexamethasone or triamcinolone and anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF monotherapy in DME treatment.