Diagnostic imaging of peritoneal metastases in ovarian and colorectal cancer remains pivotal in selecting the most appropriate treatment and balancing clinical benefit with treatment-related morbidity and mortality. To address the challenges related to diagnostic imaging and detecting and reporting peritoneal metastatic spread, a joint guideline was created by the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), and European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Urothelial cancer is the second most common cancer, and cause of cancer death, related to the genitourinary tract. The goals of imaging for pretreatment staging of urothelial cancer are to evaluate for both local and distant spread of the cancer and assessing for synchronous sites of urothelial cancer in the upper tracts and bladder. For pretreatment staging of urothelial carcinoma, patients can be stratified into one of three groups: 1) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer; 2) muscle invasive bladder cancer; and 3) upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. This document is a review of the current literature for urothelial cancer and resulting recommendations for pretreatment staging imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Active surveillance (AS) has been widely adopted as an alternative to immediate surgery owing to the indolent nature and favorable outcomes of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). AS is generally recommended for tumors measuring ≤1 cm without aggressive cytological subtypes, risk of gross extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node metastasis (LNM), or distant metastasis. AS requires careful patient selection based on various patient and tumor characteristics, and ultrasound (US) findings. Moreover, during AS, regular US is performed to monitor any signs of tumor progression, including tumor growth, new US features of potential gross ETE, and LNM. Therefore, appropriate imaging-based assessment plays a crucial role in determining whether AS or surgery should be pursued. However, detailed recommendations concerning US evaluation are currently insufficient, necessitating the formulation of this guideline. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology has developed a consensus statement for low-risk PTMC, covering US assessment methods when considering AS as a management option and conducting follow-up imaging tests during AS. This guideline aims to provide optimal scientific evidence and expert opinion consensus regarding a standardized US-based assessment protocol for low-risk PTMC.

This guideline will discuss radiotherapeutic management of IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma, using the latest 2021 WHO (5th) classification of brain tumours focusing on: imaging modalities, tumour volume delineation, irradiation dose and fractionation.

Somatic variant testing through next-generation sequencing (NGS) is well integrated into Swiss molecular pathology laboratories and has become a standard diagnostic method for numerous indications in cancer patient care. Currently, there is a wide variation in reporting practices within our country, and as patients move between different hospitals, it is increasingly necessary to standardize NGS reports to ease their reinterpretation. Additionally, as many different stakeholders-oncologists, hematologists, geneticists, pathologists, and patients-have access to the NGS report, it needs to contain comprehensive and detailed information in order to answer the questions of experts and avoid misinterpretation by non-experts. In 2017, the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics conducted a survey to assess the differences in NGS reporting practices across ten pathology institutes in Switzerland. The survey examined 68 reporting items and identified 48 discrepancies. Based on these findings, the Swiss Society of Molecular Pathology initiated a Delphi method to reach a consensus on a set of recommendations for NGS reporting. Reports should include clinical information about the patient and the diagnosis, technical details about the sample and the test performed, and a list of all clinically relevant variants and variants of uncertain significance. In the absence of a consensus on an actionability scheme, the five-class pathogenicity scheme proposed by the ACMG/AMP guideline must be included in the reports. The Swiss Society of Molecular Pathology recognizes the importance of including clinical actionability in the report and calls on the European community of molecular pathologists and oncologists to reach a consensus on this issue.

The contemporary management and resectability of locally advanced lung cancer are undergoing significant changes as new data emerge regarding immunotherapy and targeted treatments. The objective of this document is to review the literature and present consensus among a group of multidisciplinary experts to guide the determination of resectability and management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of contemporary evidence.

The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer provide multidisciplinary diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment recommendations for this disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail how the evolution of the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance and single-agent regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer informed panel recommendations in the guidelines.

Target population These recommendations apply to adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 infiltrative diffuse glioma (oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma).Questions and Recommendations:Imaging Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, do advanced imaging techniques using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, perfusion weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging or PET provide superior assessment of tumor recurrence and histologic progression compared to standard MRI neuroimaging?Recommendation Level III: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, advanced imaging techniques using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, perfusion weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging or PET are suggested for identification of tumor recurrence or histologic progression.Pathology Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, is molecular testing for IDH-1, IDH-2, and TP53 Mutations and MGMT promotor methylation mutation warranted for predicting survival and formulating treatment recommendations?Recommendation Level III: It is suggested that IDH mutation status be determined for diagnostic purposes. TP53 mutations occur early in WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma pathogenesis, remain stable, and are not suggested as a marker of predisposition to malignant transformation at recurrence or other measures of prognosis. Assessment of MGMT status is suggested as an adjunct to assessing prognosis. Assessment of CDK2NA status is suggested since this is associated with malignant progression of WHO grade 2 diffuse gliomas.Q2: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO Grade 2 diffuse glioma, is testing of proliferation indices (MIB-1 and/or BUdR) warranted for predicting survival and formulating treatment recommendations?Recommendation Level III: It is suggested that proliferative indices (MIB-1 or BUdR) be measured in WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma as higher proliferation indices are associated with increased likelihood of recurrence and shorter progression free and overall survival.Chemotherapy Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, does addition of temozolomide (TMZ), other cytotoxic agents or targeted agents to their treatment regimen improve PFS and/or OS?Recommendation Level III: Temozolomide is suggested in the therapy of recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma as it may improve clinical symptoms. PCV is suggested in the therapy of WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma at recurrence as it may improve clinical symptoms with the strongest evidence being for oligodendrogliomas. TMZ is suggested as the initial choice for recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma. Carboplatin is not suggested as there is no significant benefit from carboplatin as single agent therapy for recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse gliomas. There is insufficient evidence to make any recommendations regarding other agents in the management of recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma.Radiotherapy Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, does addition of radiotherapy to treatment regimen improve PFS and/or OS?Recommendation Level III: Radiation is suggested at recurrence if there was no previous radiation treatment. Q2: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma after previous radiotherapy, does addition of re-irradiation or proton therapy to the treatment regimen improve PFS and/or OS?Recommendation Level III: It is suggested that re-irradiation be considered in the setting of WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma recurrence as it may provide benefit in PFS and OS.Surgery Q1: In adult patients with suspected recurrence of histologically proven WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma, does surgical resection improve PFS and/or OS?. There is insufficient evidence to make any new specific recommendations regarding the value of surgery or extent of resection in relationship to survival for recurrent WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma.

This clinical practice guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides an evidence-based approach for the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic masses. This document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and addresses needle selection (fine-needle biopsy [FNB] needle vs FNA needle), needle caliber (22-gauge vs 25-gauge needles), FNB needle type (novel or contemporary [fork-tip and Franseen] vs alternative FNB needle designs), and sample processing (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE] vs no ROSE). In addition, this guideline addresses stent selection (self-expandable metal stents [SEMS] vs plastic stents), SEMS type (covered [cSEMS] vs uncovered [uSEMS]), and pain management (celiac plexus neurolysis [CPN] vs medical analgesic therapy). In patients with solid pancreatic masses undergoing EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), the ASGE recommends FNB needles over FNA needles. With regard to needle caliber, the ASGE suggests 22-gauge over 25-gauge needles. When an FNB needle is used, the ASGE recommends using either a fork-tip or a Franseen needle over alternative FNB needle designs. After a sample has been obtained, the ASGE suggests against the routine use of ROSE in patients undergoing an initial EUS-TA of a solid pancreatic mass. In patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction undergoing drainage with ERCP, the ASGE suggests using SEMS over plastic stents. In patients with proven malignancy undergoing SEMS placement, the ASGE suggests using cSEMS over uSEMS. If malignancy has not been histopathologically confirmed, the ASGE recommends against the use of uSEMS. Finally, in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and abdominal pain, the ASGE suggests the use of CPN as an adjunct for the treatment of abdominal pain. This document outlines the process, analyses, and decision approaches used to reach the final recommendations and represents the official ASGE recommendations on the above topics.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) originate from the secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system, with the majority arising in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Given the heterogeneity in the biological behavior and morphological differentiation of these tumors, advanced imaging techniques are crucial for supporting the suspected diagnosis, accurate staging, and monitoring therapy. As most well-differentiated NEN demonstrate overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSR) on the cell surface, SSR-directed PET/CT is considered the reference standard for imaging of this particular entity. SSR-PET/CT should be the imaging method of choice in every NEN G1 or G2 and considered for re-staging after both potentially curative and non-curative surgeries. The extent of SSR expression is also crucial for determining a patient's eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). PRRT utilizes [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE to target the SSR receptor and can significantly prolong progression-free survival in patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumor of the gastroenteropancreatic system (GEP-NET). PET/CT is a central component of the multidisciplinary management of NEN. Variable follow-up intervals are recommended, considering that tumors with higher proliferation rates or advanced metastatic disease require more frequent assessments. The combination with other imaging modalities, like MRI, complements SSR-PET/CT, further enhancing overall diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: Somatostatin receptor-PET/CT (SSR-PET/CT) is the guideline-recommended reference standard for imaging well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET). SSR-PET/CT should be the diagnostic imaging of choice for staging and post-therapy re-staging of grade 1 or 2 NET (G1 or G2). Variable follow-up intervals are recommended for NET G1 and G2. Tumors with higher proliferation rates or advanced metastatic disease necessitate more frequent assessments.

The pathology and management of breast masses in pediatric patients is markedly different than in adults. The vast majority of lesions in children and adolescents are benign, but the rare malignant breast masses require prompt recognition and treatment. Pediatric surgeons navigating clinical evaluation of these masses must balance preservation of the developing breast with appropriate diagnosis and surgical management.

Part II of the S3 guideline report deals with the surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma, neck dissection for oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas and adjuvant therapy options. Primary surgical therapy ± adjuvant radio- or radiochemotherapy and primary radio- or radiochemotherapy are established as primary therapies for local-regional hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Direct randomized comparisons of both basic therapeutic procedures were never conducted. Available registry data show a worse prognosis of hypopharyngeal carcinoma compared to oropharyngeal carcinomas in all locoregional tumor stages, regardless of the treatment method. For T1N0-T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, there are no relevant differences in overall survival and locoregional relapse rate between primary surgical and primary non-surgical treatment. Primary surgical therapy ± adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy and primary radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy are established as primary therapies for advanced but locoregionally limited hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Neck dissection is an integral part of the primary surgical treatment of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. There are only a few randomized studies on non-surgical organ preservation for advanced hypopharyngeal cancer as an alternative to pharyngolaryngectomy, but these have led to the recommendation of alternative concepts in the new guideline. The indication and implementation of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy for hypopharyngeal carcinoma do not differ from those for HPV/p16-negative and -positive oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become the standard for initial lung cancer diagnosis and staging. Previous guidelines have generally focused on the "when" and "how" of EBUS-TBNA; however, little guidance is available on handling and processing specimens during and after acquisition to help optimize both diagnostic yield and tissue integrity for ancillary studies. This document examines the available literature on EBUS-TBNA specimen processing and handling.

Thyroid cancer (TC) represents 3% of global cancer incidence. Recent changes have optimized treatment decisions based on risk assessment, molecular profiling, and imaging assessment, leading the development of targeted agents that have modified the natural history of this disease. This increasing complexity on treatment options requires careful assessment at the different stages of the disease to provide the most suitable approach from diagnosis to long-term follow-up. This guideline aims to offer a comprehensive and practical overview on the current status and last updates of TC management.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 2% to 3% of malignant tumors in adults, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1.5∶1 worldwide. It can occur in all age groups, with a peak incidence in the 60-70 age range, and the median age is approximately 64 years. The current causes of kidney cancer are still unclear, but smoking, obesity, hypertension, and some genetic factors are considered risk factors for kidney cancer development. Conducive to the gradual popularization of physical examination and screening, more and more patients with kidney cancer are being detected and treated in the early stages. However, nearly 30% of patients still have locally advanced or metastatic kidney cancer at the time of initial diagnosis. Traditional chemotherapy drugs are generally ineffective for advanced RCC, and currently, advanced RCC is mainly treated with anti-vascular and immunotherapy. At present, first-line treatment is mostly stratified based on clinical characteristics such as International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognosis risk, and there are multiple options available, including anti vascular therapy, anti-vascular combined immunotherapy, and dual immunotherapy. Subsequently, first-line treatment often selects drugs based on the composition, effectiveness, and safety of first-line treatment plans. In recent years, research has found that the molecular typing and metastasis characteristics of RCC also affect the prognosis of patients, leading to many controversies in the treatment of advanced RCC. This consensus is guided by the controversial clinical issues in the management of advanced RCC. After discussion and voting by multidisciplinary clinical experts, a consensus of 10 clinical issues has been reached. At the same time, experts recommend domestic clinical and research institutions to lead or participate in more large-scale clinical trials, providing more basis for clinical decision-making and the selection of the best beneficiaries.

This article briefly summarizes clinically relevant new aspects of the recently published German, Austrian, and Swiss Onkopedia guideline for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Main aspects comprise (i) the use of total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancers with high-risk features, (ii) treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with a low risk for local recurrence, (iii) immunotherapy using dostarlimab in patients with MSI high/dMMR rectal cancer, as well as (iv) the implementation of organ sparing treatment concepts. The availability of several evidence-based treatment options requires intensive discussion within the multidisciplinary team as well as dedicated information for patients about treatment goals, options, and risks of individual treatment approaches.

Almost any primary or metastatic brain tumour can manifest in intraventricular (IV) locations. These tumours may either originate within the ventricular system or extend into the IV space through growth. Such neoplasms represent a broad spectrum, with supratentorial IV tumours forming a heterogeneous group. This group includes primary ependymal tumours, central neurocytomas, choroid plexus tumours, and notably, meningiomas, as well as a variety of non-neoplastic, benign, glial, and metastatic lesions that can secondarily invade the IV compartment. Often presenting with nonspecific symptoms, these tumours can lead to delayed medical attention. The diversity in potential diagnoses, combined with their deep and complex locations, poses significant management challenges. This paper aims to delineate optimal management strategies, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care, especially in settings with limited resources, to effectively navigate the complexities associated with treating intraventricular brain tumours.

The posterior fossa is a limited compartment therefore lesions compressing its structures can result in devastating outcomes. It can cause significant neurological deficit due to mass effect on critical structures and hydrocephalus. Due to the nature of the infratentorial region, urgent surgical intervention is often the first-line option. Surgical neuro-oncologists guide patients and caregivers through the course of this disease and to inform them about the various options for management and long-term outcome optimisation. There is currently conflicting data; however, institutional experiences can guide us towards achieving improvements in surgical outcomes and quality of life. Advances in molecular classifications coupled with highdose radiation treatment improve our capacity for improving overall survival in these patients. Common childhood tumours are ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas, while adults often present with metastases, and less commonly, cerebellar haemangioblastomas and gliomas. This paper outlines management strategies with consideration for multidisciplinary care and resourcelimited settings.

The understanding of brainstem gliomas and diffuse midline gliomas has significantly increased in the last decade. However, the management paradigm remains a dilemma. The critical location is the foremost factor dictating the outcome. Recent advancements in the field of neuro-oncology are pushing the boundaries of optimal care in the developed world nevertheless, the strategies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) need to be tailored according to the resources to improve outcome. The objective of these guidelines is to provide an algorithm-based management plan to cater challenges for healthcare providers in LMICs.

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are brain tumors of glial cells origin. They are grade 1 and grade 2 tumors according to the WHO classification. Diagnosis of LGG is made through imaging, histopathological analysis, and use of molecular markers. Imaging alone does not establish the grade of the tumor and thus a histopathological examination of tissue is crucial in establishing the definite histopathological diagnosis. Clinical presentation varies according to the location and size of the tumor. Surgical resection is strongly recommended in LGG over observation to improve overall survival as surgery leads to greater benefit due to progression-free survival. Radiation has shown benefits in LGG patients in randomized controlled trials and chemotherapy with temozolomide has also shown good results. This paper covers the principles of low-grade gliomas management and summarizes the recommendations for the LMICs.