Most U.S. health plans use managed care strategies, including health care use management and clinician networks. Most Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance enrollees are covered by managed care plans. Managed care is ostensibly used to steer patients toward high-quality clinicians and facilities and contain costs; however, prior authorization, narrow clinician networks, and other managed care strategies often restrict access to necessary care, causing frustration among patients and physicians. In this position paper, the American College of Physicians offers policy recommendations to protect patients from onerous managed care processes, reduce administrative burdens associated with managed care, and ensure that patients can promptly access high-value, medically necessary care.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed these rapid practice points addressing the comparative effectiveness and harms of trivalent (3 different influenza viruses or viral proteins) and quadrivalent (4 different influenza viruses or viral proteins) influenza vaccines in adults aged 18 years or older who are not pregnant or immunocompromised. These practice points do not address adults aged 18 years or older who are pregnant or immunocompromised.

Seasonal influenza is a contagious viral respiratory illness that causes yearly epidemics.

Data extraction is a critical but error-prone and labor-intensive task in evidence synthesis. Unlike other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, large language models (LLMs) do not require labeled training data for data extraction.

Urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) and urinary protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) are both used in clinical practice to diagnose and monitor chronic kidney disease (CKD). Which measure exhibits stronger associations with clinical outcomes and whether this varies by patient characteristics are unknown.

Safe and reliable venous access is critical for high-quality cancer care. Patients with both solid and hematologic cancers require vascular access devices (VADs) for systemic chemotherapies and for supportive treatments, including blood products, antimicrobials, antiemetics, and fluids. However, VADs are associated with serious complications, including bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism. Evidence-based guidance could maximize benefits and reduce risks in the selection and management of VADs in patients with cancer. The authors convened a 9-member international multidisciplinary panel and used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop recommendations for VAD selection, insertion, and management in patients with cancer. A literature review informed the development of clinical scenarios, which were rated by the panel for appropriateness based on cancer type, treatment indication, urgency, comorbidities, and anticipated duration of use. Of 1422 scenarios, 502 (35%) were rated as appropriate, 400 (28%) were rated as neutral/uncertain, and 520 (37%) were rated as inappropriate. Appropriateness of VAD selection varied by type of cancer, treatment urgency, and planned dwell time. For patients with acute hematologic cancers requiring urgent chemotherapy, placement of a double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or a tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) was rated as appropriate, regardless of treatment intensity or infusate characteristics. For patients with malignant solid tumors, a single-lumen tunneled CVC or implanted port was rated as appropriate for delivering chemotherapy, regardless of treatment intensity, urgency, or duration. In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, coordination of care with a nephrologist to ensure vein preservation in the context of cancer prognosis was recommended. By developing comprehensive, evidence-informed expert recommendations, the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters in Adult Patients With Cancer (MAGIC-ONC) aims to improve clinical care, reduce complications, support quality improvement efforts, and advance the safety of vascular access for patients with cancer.

The comparative gastrointestinal safety across glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and tirzepatide is still unclear.

Evidence synthesis and guideline groups have the potential to address health disparities. In June 2024, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) cosponsored a summit to address racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and other syntheses and guidelines, with support from Cochrane US. This article summarizes cross-cutting themes around future directions for systematic reviews and guidelines. Discussions addressed include the rationale for addressing racial health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; representation of people with lived experience in systematic reviews and guidelines; approaches to developing and addressing equity-focused scope, including frameworks, methods, and thoughtful interpretation in systematic reviews; challenges and opportunities for guideline recommendations; need for standardized language and reporting for race and ethnicity in primary research studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines; and measures to track the progress of incorporating and addressing racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines. Participants acknowledged that a one-size-fits-all approach was not possible or desired. Consensus priorities for next steps were to develop methods guidance to address equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; develop measures to track the progress of addressing racial and health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; operationalize engaging representative interest holders in systematic reviews and guidelines; and share resources and learning for advancing health equity.