Representativeness in randomized clinical trials remains a critical concern, affecting the external validity of trial results, equitable access to the risks and benefits of research participation, and public trust in clinical research. Although representative participation by members of groups traditionally underrepresented in clinical trials is just a surrogate for true diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in clinical trials, it can be quantified, allowing stakeholders to add empirical rigor to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging efforts. Multiple ways to measure representativeness have been proposed, including the participation-to-prevalence ratio, raw participation proportions or numbers for relevant subgroups, and enrollment fraction for relevant subgroups. These methods have strengths and weaknesses and may be appropriate to report in certain circumstances, depending on why stakeholders seek to assess representativeness. Stakeholders-including regulatory agencies, journal editors, clinical trial investigators, and trial sponsors-may use quantitative measures of representativeness to establish trial enrollment standards, monitor equitable participation in ongoing trials, and condition funding or drug or device approval on achieving specific representativeness targets. However, using quantitative measures of representativeness in this way could have unintended consequences, including researchers "gaming" recruitment strategies to meet target numbers, overlooking nuanced variations within communities, and potentially incentivizing problematic and exploitative recruitment strategies. Although no single method of measuring representativeness offers a comprehensive solution for increasing diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in all randomized clinical trials, a carefully designed, multifaceted approach to measuring representativeness may provide stakeholders with useful perspectives for measuring progress in increasing the diversity of clinical trial participation. For stakeholders seeking a single number to assess the representativeness of a trial enrolling patients with a disease state with well-delineated demographics, the participation-to-prevalence ratio is ideal; however, for a more nuanced view of representativeness, the combination of enrollment fraction in subgroups of relevance plus a full report of the demographics of patients approached for enrollment may be more appropriate.

Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relative to the diagnosis time. We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on clinical outcomes after AF ablation.

Despite advancements in diagnostics and therapeutics for cardiovascular disease, significant health disparities persist among patients from historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, women, individuals who are socioeconomically under-resourced or underinsured, and those living in rural communities. While transcatheter interventions have revolutionized the treatment landscape in cardiology, populations bearing the greatest burden of disease continue to face inequitable access and poorer outcomes. A notable gap in the literature concerns the role of modern approaches to cardiovascular device innovation in shaping and perpetuating health disparities. Health equity has been declared one of the top strategic initiatives for 2022 to 2025 by the Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, underscoring the need for greater attention, dialogue, and targeted interventions in this space. This narrative review uses the cardiovascular device life cycle as a conceptual framework to enhance understanding and guide future efforts to mitigate disparities in the field of interventional cardiology. Drawing on illustrative examples from interventional cardiology, we examine current practices in cardiovascular device regulation and approval, clinical trial evaluation, adoption patterns, and postprocedural outcomes with the aim of uncovering potential mechanisms of disparities and identifying opportunities for targeted interventions.

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) appears to be diagnosed twice as often in male than in female patients. This could be attributed to underdiagnosis in female patients or sex differences in susceptibility. Up to 30% of cases have an autosomal dominant monogenic cause, where equal sex prevalence would be expected. The aim of this systematic review, meta-analysis, and population study was to assess the sex ratio in patients with DCM, stratified by genetic status, and evaluate whether this is influenced by diagnostic bias.

Over the past decades, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has become a contemporary treatable disease. However, limited data exist on the global trends of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) utilization and its impact on mortality/morbidity burden reduction.

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

Some patients with aortic stenosis may require multiple valve interventions in their lifetime, and choosing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as the initial intervention may be appealing to many. If their transcatheter heart valve degenerates later in life, most will hope to undergo redo-TAVR. However, if redo-TAVR is not feasible, some may have to undergo surgical explantation of their transcatheter heart valve (TAVR-explant). With rising numbers of TAVR in younger patients, we address the practical implications of choosing a TAVR-first strategy. In this review we explore potential factors contributing to higher-than-expected mortality after TAVR-explant, synthesize available outcomes data for TAVR-explant for structurally degenerated valves, and describe strategies to standardize and optimize surgical techniques for TAVR-explant. We also discuss clinical outcomes of redo-TAVR within the context of limitations in currently published series and highlight the potential benefit of virtual planning to assess the feasibility of future redo-TAVR before implanting the first valve. Finally, we highlight areas for future investigation to inform management strategies in patients who may require multiple aortic valve interventions.

Advances in critical care therapies for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), including temporary mechanical circulatory support and multidisciplinary shock teams, have led to improved survival to hospital discharge, ranging from 60% to 70%. After their index hospitalization, however, survivors of CS may continue to face cardiac as well as extracardiac sequelae of these therapies and complications for years to come. Most studies in CS have focused primarily on survival, with limited data on long-term recovery measures among survivors. In other forms of critical illness, research indicates that many intensive care unit survivors experience impairments in multiple domains, such as cognitive function, physical ability, and mental health. These impairments, collectively referred to as Post-Intensive Care Syndrome, in turn impact survivors' quality of life and future prognosis. This review identifies unique aspects of CS-related survivorship, highlights lessons learned from other forms of critical illness, and outlines future research directions to determine specific strategies to enhance recovery and survivorship after CS.

The integrative physiology of the left ventricle and systemic circulation is fundamental to our understanding of advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. In simplest terms, any increase in aortic stiffness increases the vascular afterload presented to the failing left ventricle. The net effect is increased myocardial oxygen demand and reduced coronary perfusion pressure, thereby further deteriorating contractile function. Although mechanical circulatory support devices should theoretically work in concert with guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization and inotropic and vasopressor agents designed to support myocardial performance and enhance left ventricle recovery, this does not always occur. Each therapy and intervention may result in vastly different and sometimes deleterious effects on vascular afterload. Although best described by a combination of both steady-state and pulsatile components, the latter is frequently overlooked when mean arterial pressure or systemic vascular resistance alone is used to quantify vascular afterload in advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. In this state-of-the-art review, we examine what is known about vascular afterload in advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock, including the use of temporary and permanent mechanical circulatory support systems. Importantly, we outline 4 key components for a more complete assessment of vascular afterload. Unlike previous discussions on this topic, we set aside considerations of venous return and ventricular preload, as important as they are, to focus exclusively on the hydraulic load within the systemic circulation against which the impaired left ventricle must contract.

The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is growing, both to assist individuals with infertility and for fertility preservation. Individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD), or risk factors for CVD, are increasingly using ART. Thus, knowing how to care for patients undergoing ART is important for the cardiovascular clinician. In this scientific statement, we review the ART process and known short-term and long-term risks associated with ART that can adversely affect patients with CVD. We review current knowledge on risks from ART for specific cardiac conditions and provide a suggested approach to evaluating and counseling patients with CVD contemplating ART as well as suggested management before and during the ART process. Individuals with CVD are at increased risk for pregnancy complications, and management of this unique population has been discussed previously. The focus of this scientific statement is on ART. Therefore, discussions on risk assessment, counseling, and management of individuals with CVD during pregnancy are limited, and established guidelines are referenced.

Disorders of the pulmonic valve (PV) receive considerably less attention than other forms of valvular heart disease. Due to the dramatically improved survival of children with congenital heart disease over the last 5 decades, there has been a steady increase in the prevalence of adults with congenital heart disease, which necessitates that clinicians become familiar with the anatomy and the evaluation of right ventricular outflow tract and PV anomalies. A multimodality imaging approach using echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of the anatomy and function of the right ventricular outflow tract, PV, and supravalvular region. As clinical presentation is often insidious with nonspecific symptoms, yet morbidity and mortality associated with severe untreated PV disease are significant, a high index of suspicion coupled with appropriate use of imaging techniques is critical in facilitating timely diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we aim to present a comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of PV disease and associated right ventricular outflow tract or supravalvular pulmonary stenosis, including optimal use of multimodality imaging to facilitate timely diagnosis, optimize therapeutic strategies, enhance postprocedural surveillance, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

It is well understood that cancer therapies including chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and radiation can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer. This can manifest as a multitude of pathologies including left ventricular dysfunction, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, accelerated atherosclerosis, and coronary vasospasm. Multimodal cardiac imaging plays a critical role in diagnosing such pathologies by relying on noninvasive tools including echocardiograms, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and coronary computed tomography angiography. These methods have unique considerations and in recent years have made significant progress in their diagnostic capabilities in this patient population. As the field of cardio-oncology continues to expand rapidly, guidance on the management of such toxicities and the development of imaging technologies is crucial. In this review, we present 2 complex cases of atherosclerosis and myocarditis in patients with cancer, highlighting our rationale for management and discussing the nuances of various cardiac imaging modalities.

There is a new awareness of the widespread nature of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its connection to cardiovascular disease (CVD). This has catalyzed collaboration between cardiologists, hepatologists, endocrinologists, and the wider multidisciplinary team to address the need for earlier identification of those with MASLD who are at increased risk for CVD. The overlap in the pathophysiologic processes and parallel prevalence of CVD, metabolic syndrome, and MASLD highlight the multisystem consequences of poor cardiovascular-liver-metabolic health. Metabolic dysfunction and associated insulin resistance, together with the predilection for ectopic fat deposition in the liver and surrounding tissues, are associated with elevated risk of endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammatory response, and ectopic fat deposition in the epicardium. This complex pathophysiology can accelerate atherogenic dyslipidemia, atherogenesis, diastolic dysfunction, valvular calcification, and cardiac arrhythmias. Despite the mounting evidence of mechanistic pathways underpinning MASLD and CVD, current recommendations have not clearly focused upon MASLD as a risk factor or target for intervention in CVD. We have brought together a diverse range of international experts committed to promoting cardiovascular-liver-metabolic health and related outcomes across the globe. The overarching goal of this document is to offer a construct for clinicians in the cardiovascular field with regards to (1) diagnosis and screening of MASLD through the use of noninvasive serum and imaging tests; (2) screening for CVD in all individuals with MASLD regardless of established atherosclerotic risk factors; and (3) the approach to management of MASLD with respect to prevention of CVD through lifestyle, as well as pharmacologic and surgical strategies. To achieve this, the modified Delphi method was applied and a series of evidence-based quality standard recommendations have been identified.

Aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexist and share pathophysiological mechanisms. The proportion of patients with AS and CAD requiring revascularization varies widely because of uncertainty about best clinical practices. Although combined surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting has been the standard of care, management options in patients with AS and CAD requiring revascularization have expanded with the advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Potential alternative treatment pathways include revascularization before TAVR, concomitant TAVR and percutaneous coronary intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention after TAVR and deferred percutaneous coronary intervention or hybrid procedures. Selection depends on underlying disease severity, antithrombotic treatment strategies, clinical presentation, and symptom evolution after TAVR. In patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, the addition of coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with improved long-term mortality, especially if CAD is complex. although it is associated with higher periprocedural risk. The therapeutic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with TAVR is less well-established. The multitude of clinical permutations and remaining uncertainties do not support a uniform treatment strategy for patients with AS and CAD. Therefore, to provide the best possible care for each individual patient, heart teams need to be familiar with the available data on AS and CAD. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of the evidence supporting the decision-making process between transcatheter and surgical approaches and the key elements of treatment selection in patients with AS and CAD.

Complex ventricular tachycardias involving the fascicular system (fascicular ventricular tachycardias [FVTs]) can be challenging. In this review, we describe our approach to the diagnosis and ablation of these arrhythmias with 10 illustrative cases that involve (1) differentiation from supraventricular tachycardia; (2) assessment for atypical bundle branch reentry and other interfascicular FVTs; (3) examination of P1/P2 activation sequences in sinus rhythm, pacing, and tachycardia; and (4) entrainment techniques to establish the tachycardia mechanism and aid circuit localization. To summarize, 5 cases had prior ablation with 2 previously misdiagnosed as supraventricular tachycardia. A short His-ventricular interval supported ventricular tachycardia. Atrial stimulation could initiate and entrain 4 FVTs. P1 potentials were recorded in all cases of left posterior FVT. Entrainment at P1 and P1 to P2 connection sites at the mid-septal region, and the postablation emergence of a late P1 with decremental properties, is consistent with the left septal fascicle being the slowly conducting, retrograde limb of the left posterior FVT circuit. Ablation targeting the mid-septal left septal fascicle and P1 to P2 connection sites successfully eliminated left posterior FVT. Right ventricular apical pacing was useful in differentiating bundle branch reentry and focal FVTs from reentrant FVTs. Two cases exhibited bundle branch reentry and other interfascicular FVTs. Three cases were postinfarct FVTs involving the LPF, where pacing and entrainment at sites of conduction system potentials were able to localize sites critical for ablation, in contrast to previously unsuccessful substrate modification. In conclusion, several ventricular tachycardia mechanisms involving the fascicular system can occur in both structurally normal and abnormal hearts. A high index of suspicion is required given their rarity and potential for misdiagnosis. Once identified, we emphasize a structured approach to the diagnosis and management of FVTs to confirm the mechanism and localize suitable ablation targets involving careful recording of conduction system potentials and pacing/entrainment maneuvers.

Children with left heart disease are at risk for developing pulmonary hypertension, initially secondary to pulmonary venous hypertension that can progress to include elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, known as combined pre- and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance may pose a risk to the right ventricle of a newly transplanted heart because of increased afterload and is an important consideration for heart transplant eligibility. However, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, optimal diagnostic and treatment approaches, and thresholds for pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease remain unclear because of lack of evidence, particularly in pediatrics. The result is heterogeneity with respect to hemodynamic assessment, use of pulmonary vasodilator therapies, and heart transplant listing. This scientific statement aims to synthesize the available data and highlight areas of general consensus as well as important knowledge gaps.

Transradial arterial access has transformed the field of coronary interventions, where it has several advantages over femoral access, such as reduced bleeding and access site complications, improved patient comfort, shorter time to ambulation after the procedure, reduced length of hospital stay, and potentially reduced mortality rates. Because of these benefits, as well as the concurrent expanding indications for various endovascular therapies, there is growing interest in adopting radial access for peripheral vascular interventions. However, radial access can present challenges, and specialized equipment for peripheral interventions through this route are under development. Nevertheless, a growing number of studies, largely comprising single-center and registry data, have broadly suggested that transradial arterial access is likely to be safe and associated with reduced bleeding and local access site complications for most peripheral interventions compared with transfemoral access. Large, prospective randomized trials are lacking, and the question of any effect on mortality rates has not been addressed. Whereas the field of transradial arterial access for peripheral vascular interventions is in development, it is clear that this approach, at least with available equipment, will not be suitable for all patients, and careful case selection is paramount. Furthermore, the remaining knowledge gaps must be addressed, and robust outcome data obtained, to allow full understanding of the factors that determine optimal patient, lesion, and equipment selection. Nevertheless, the use of transradial arterial access for peripheral vascular interventions holds great promise, particularly if the necessary technologic advances are rapid and favorable clinical trial data continue to emerge.

Smokeless oral nicotine products are addictive, and their use has potential adverse effects on some but not all biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. The use of some types of these products, for instance, is associated with an increased mortality risk in those with ischemic heart or cerebrovascular disease. Similarly, smokeless tobacco has the potential to increase the risk of oral cancer, but the risks depend on the chemical composition of the product. The market of smokeless oral nicotine products has transformed since the last American Heart Association smokeless tobacco policy statement. Several varieties of tobacco-free oral nicotine products-including oral nicotine pouches; nontherapeutic nicotine gums, lozenges, and tablets; and nicotine gummies-have rapidly proliferated. The sales of oral nicotine pouches, in particular, have increased substantially; however, no data are available on their cardiovascular or health risks. In addition, synthetic (compared with tobacco-derived) nicotine has been used in some brands of oral nicotine products, but its cardiovascular and health effects have been inadequately studied. Robust public policy levers are identified to support ending addiction to all commercial tobacco products. Critical components and policy initiatives include clinicians emphasizing the prevention of tobacco product initiation and supporting cessation with established pharmacological and behavioral tobacco dependence treatment therapies as primary goals for achieving an end to commercial tobacco and nicotine addiction.

Conventional forms of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging that evaluate morphology, function, flow, and metabolism play a vital role in individual treatment decisions, often based on guidelines. Innovations in molecular imaging have enhanced our ability to spatially quantify the expression of a wider array of disease-related proteins, genes, or cell types, or the activity of specific pathogenic pathways. These techniques, which usually rely on design of targeted imaging probes, have already been used extensively in cancer medicine and have now become part of cardiovascular care in conditions such as amyloidosis and sarcoidosis. The recognition that common cardiovascular conditions are caused by a substantial diversity of pathobiologic pathways and the diversity of therapies available for use have rekindled interest in expanding the role of molecular imaging of tissue phenotype to improve precision in diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. The intent of this article is to raise awareness and understanding of approaches to molecular or cellular imaging of phenotype with targeted probes, and their potential to promote the principles of precision medicine. Also addressed are the diverse roles of molecular imaging to improve precision and efficiency of new drug development at the stages of candidate identification, preclinical testing, and clinical trials.

The Fontan circuit is associated with chronically elevated systemic venous pressures and decreased cardiac output, often leading to circuit failure. Managing Fontan circuit failure is complex and requires multiple therapeutic options. Transcatheter interventions have emerged as a reliable approach. They can alleviate obstructions and improve cyanosis by enhancing pulmonary blood flow and oxygen saturation. These procedures can also increase cardiac output and reduce systemic venous pressure, contributing to patient stabilization. In addition, they help mitigate volume overload and decrease the risk of bleeding during heart or combined heart and liver transplants. In recent years, percutaneous interventions have rapidly evolved and become a key therapeutic option for addressing various aspects of Fontan circuit failure. These interventions should be considered integral to the management strategy for this specific patient population.