Amongst Ewing sarcoma family of tumours, (EFST), cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma are defined as tumours arising from cutaneous or subcutaneous tissue, not invading the underlying aponeurosis. They are rare tumours, with less than 200 patients published. They are typically small tumours (less than 5cm), and can arise at any anatomical location, with a particular tropism for distal, truncal and head/neck locations, compared to classical Ewing sarcoma. Like other conjunctive tumours, they have to be treated in specialized centers, with a diagnostic procedure following ESMO guidelines about soft-tissue tumours, favoring a core needle biopsy in most cases. They share classical pathological and molecular features of EFST (including EWSR1 rearrangement). Metastatic presentation is rare (less than 5% at diagnosis), but must be carefully searched using appropriated imaging considered the bad prognosis of these patients. Treatment strategy relies on neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, surrounding the local treatment. Patients with localized disease have good prognosis and have to be treated with the dual objective of curability, and of minimizing acute and late toxicity. That is why in case of small tumours (<200mL), patients can be treated with less intensive protocols, as Saint Jude's (low-dose semi-continuous cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin regimen as induction chemotherapy and vincristine/actinomycin courses as maintenance therapy), setting aside the option of classical VDC/IE protocol for larger tumors. Local treatment must rely on carcinologic surgery, with the aim to avoid radiotherapy when possible. Patients with metastatic disease have bad prognosis resemble classical Ewing sarcoma, and have to be treated accordingly.

Patients who develop Ewing sarcoma with extra-pulmonary metastasis have a poor prognosis. A recent French protocol, CombinaiR3, was set up to evaluate the efficacy of induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and metronomic maintenance treatment. It is now closed for inclusions and while waiting for the results, we propose a French consensus guideline for the management of patients diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma with extra-pulmonary dissemination. Main recommendations include induction chemotherapy with nine cycles of vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide/etoposide. In case of insufficient response, other chemotherapy combination or inclusion in a clinical trial should be considered. Induction chemotherapy should be followed by local treatment, consisting of surgery and/or radiotherapy. Optimal local treatment is a milestone in the management of patients with Ewing sarcoma and should be discussed with experts and surgeons/radiotherapists working in the sarcoma network. High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) containing busulfan and melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation is still unclear, with contradictory results. HDC will then be discussed in national tumor board and administered to patients when compatible with local treatment. Given the high relapse rate observed among these metastatic patients, maintenance chemotherapy (so called metronomic regimen) will then be given for two years.

Gastric premalignant conditions (GPMC) are common and include atrophic gastritis, gastric intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and certain gastric epithelial polyps. GPMC have an increased risk of progression to gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastric cancer (GC) in the United States represents an important cancer disparity because incidence rates are 2- to 13-fold greater in non-White individuals, particularly early-generation immigrants from regions of high GC incidence. The US 5-year survival rate for GC is 36%, which falls short of global standards and is driven by the fact that only a small percentage of GC in the US is diagnosed in the early, curable stage. This document represents the first iteration of American College of Gastroenterology guidelines on this topic and encompasses endoscopic surveillance for high-risk patients with GPMC, the performance of high-quality endoscopy and image-enhanced endoscopy for diagnosis and surveillance, GPMC histology criteria and reporting, endoscopic treatment of dysplasia, the role of Helicobacter pylori eradication, general risk reduction measures, and the management of autoimmune gastritis and gastric epithelial polyps. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation on upper endoscopic screening for GC/GPMC detection in US populations deemed high-risk for GC. Surveillance endoscopy is recommended for individuals at high risk for GPMC progression, as defined by endoscopic, histologic, and demographic factors, typically every 3 years, but an individualized interval may be warranted. H. pylori testing, treatment, and eradication confirmation are recommended in all individuals with GPMC. Extensive high-quality data from US populations regarding GPMC management are lacking, but continue to accrue, and the quality of evidence for the recommendations presented herein should be interpreted with this dynamic context in mind. The GPMC research and education agendas are broad and include high-quality prospective studies evaluating opportunistic endoscopic screening for GC/GPMC, refined delineation of what constitutes "high-risk" populations, development of novel biomarkers, alignment of best practices, implementation of training programs for improved GPMC/GC detection, and evaluation of the impact of these interventions on GC incidence and mortality in the US.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a key biomarker in the management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), guiding treatment decisions, particularly regarding the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). As multiple HRD assays are available, each with distinct methodologies and cutoff values, the interpretation and clinical application of HRD testing remain complex. This intergroup statement, endorsed by the German Ovarian Cancer Commission, NOGGO, AGO Austria, and AGO Swiss, aims to provide guidance on the indications, appropriate use, and limitations of HRD testing in ovarian cancer.

Osteosarcomas of the mandible represent 3-8% of osteosarcomas. The rarity of this anatomic site and its specific treatment explain that only retrospective and a few prospective studies are available in literature. However, there is a consistent evidence on the natural history and treatment of these tumors, which clearly differentiates them from osteosarcomas of the long bones. The aim of this study was to draw up recommendations based on these data and on a retrospective study by the French Sarcoma Group (GSF-GETO). Osteosarcomas of the mandible should be centrally reviewed by an expert pathologist. MDM2, GNAS and RASAL1 status should be checked, and a fragment should be frozen. Complete surgical resection with wide margins is the cornerstone of treatment. Mandibular reconstruction techniques can reduce the sequelae. Contrary to the validated treatment for osteosarcomas of limbs, the role of chemotherapy to prevent metastasis or local recurrence has yet to be clarified for mandibular osteosarcomas. The role of postoperative radiotherapy, in adults, should be discussed for these tumors, whose wide soft-tissue resection may be difficult to confirm. In children, adjuvant chemotherapy is preferable in cases of uncertain/possibly incomplete resection. Relapse of mandibular osteosarcomas is primarily local. Pulmonary metastases are delayed and less frequent than in long-bone osteosarcomas. The overall survival rate at five years is about 70%.

Histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) has traditionally been the cutoff for local surgical treatment, due to a substantial risk of cancer development. However, evidence from the past decade suggests 50-60% of CIN2 lesions spontaneously regress, and active surveillance (or conservative management-ie, leaving the lesion untreated) might be justified in some cases. Active surveillance of CIN2 lesions is now practised widely, although clear recommendations on eligibility, frequency of surveillance, threshold for treatment, and criteria for return to routine recall are insufficient in most countries. In 2023, the cumulative risk of invasive cancer over 20 years was found to be substantially higher in patients under active surveillance when compared with patients who received immediate local treatment, with the greatest difference observed in women older than 30 years. This Policy Review and practice algorithm from the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology prevention committees aims to review existing evidence and present clear recommendations to assist clinical decision making. Active surveillance, rather than immediate treatment, might be reasonable in a carefully selected cohort of patients. The risk of progression, need for repeat visits, and cumulative risk of future invasion associated with active surveillance should be carefully balanced against the benefits of awaiting regression, including consideration of the woman's age, fertility wishes, additional risk factors, and likelihood of compliance to follow-up. Clinical audit and, ideally, prospective databases are required to monitor long-term outcomes and safety.

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for definitive treatment of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin.

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in theASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow theASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found athttps://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-non-da-living-guideline.

Liver transplantation (LT) provides the best long-term survival outcomes for patients with liver cancer. As a result, the field of transplant oncology has grown greatly over the past few decades, and many centers have expanded their criteria to allow increased access to LT for liver malignancies. Center-level guidelines and practices in transplant oncology significantly vary across the world, leading to debate regarding the best course of treatment for this patient population. An international consensus conference was convened by the International Liver Transplantation Society and the International Liver Cancer Association on February 1-2, 2024, in Valencia, Spain to establish a more universal consensus regarding LT for oncologic indications. The conference followed the Delphi process, followed by an external expert review. Consensus statements were accepted regarding patient assessment and waitlisting criteria, pretransplant treatment (including immunotherapy) and downstaging, living donor LT, post-LT patient management, and patient- and caregiver-related outcomes. The multidisciplinary participants in the consensus conference provided up-to-date recommendations regarding the selection and management of patients with liver cancer being considered for LT. Although participants deferred to center protocols in many cases, there was great interest in safely expanding access to LT for patients with larger tumor burden and biologically amenable lesions.

To provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the multidisciplinary management of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPC).

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare, diverse malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin, requiring diagnosis and treatment by a specialized multidisciplinary team. Initial assessment includes radiology and biopsy, followed by wide surgical resection with clear margins for localized cases. Radiotherapy is recommended for large, deep, high-grade tumors or after incomplete resection, while perioperative chemotherapy may be considered for high-risk cases. In oligometastatic disease, combining local and systemic therapies is an option. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment in advanced disease, though other drugs show efficacy in certain subtypes. Given the limited options, enrolling in clinical trials is advised for patients needing further treatment.

The KEYNOTE-564 trial showed that adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with pembrolizumab, a PD-1 antibody, significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in localised clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a high risk of relapse. The TiNivo and CONTACT-03 trials have reported results for subsequent therapy after progression on ICI therapy in the metastatic setting. The European Association of Urology (EAU) RCC guidelines panel reassessed the new trial results to update recommendations for adjuvant therapy and post-adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved OS (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.87; p = 0.005). Recent trials of subsequent ICI after recurrence on ICI in the metastatic setting do not support ICI monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with recurrence on or after adjuvant ICI therapy. There are no prospective trial results for treatment after adjuvant pembrolizumab failure. On the basis of the recent results, the EAU RCC guidelines panel has updated the recommendation for adjuvant therapy and now issues a strong recommendation for adjuvant pembrolizumab. ICI monotherapy or combination therapy is not recommended in patients with recurrence during or shortly after adjuvant pembrolizumab. PATIENT SUMMARY: Treatment with an immunotherapy drug called pembrolizumab after surgery in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk kidney cancer delays the time to recurrence of cancer and prolongs survival. Therefore, pembrolizumab after surgery is strongly recommended for these patients. However, a significant proportion of patients have life-changing or serious side effects and these must be discussed.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a cutaneous fibroblastic tumour that is locally aggressive, with a tendency for local recurrence, but rarely metastasizes. A collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) was formed to update recommendations on DFSP diagnosis and treatment, based on current literature reviews and the experts' consensus. Diagnosis is suspected clinically and confirmed by pathology report, which should specify whether a transformation in higher-grade fibrosarcoma occurred. Detection of specific chromosomal translocations and/or fusion gene transcripts is useful to confirm diagnosis. Treatment is mainly surgical, intending to achieve complete resection of the tumour. To reduce the recurrence rate, the treatment of choice in DFSP is micrographically controlled surgery. Standard excision with a lateral safety margin of 2-3 cm is an acceptable alternative where only standard histopathological procedures are available. Imatinib is approved in Europe for treating inoperable primary tumours, locally inoperable recurrent disease, and metastatic DFSP. Use of imatinib has also been reported in extensive, difficult-to-operate tumours for preoperative reduction of tumour size, but clinical trials or large register data are required to confirm the usefulness of this approach. Therapeutic decisions for patients with fibrosarcomatous DFSP should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ('tumour board').

The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for endometrial cancer to incorporate advancements in recent high-quality randomized controlled trials. These guidelines address evolving treatment paradigms, and are tailored to the Korean medical context. Key updates include a strong recommendation for doxorubicin/trabectedin combination therapy in metastatic or recurrent unresectable leiomyosarcoma based on the significant survival benefits demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial. For advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have received strong recommendations, owing to their proven efficacy and increased accessibility in Korea. Conditional recommendations were made for combination therapies involving durvalumab and olaparib, reflecting their potential benefits, but acknowledging regulatory and accessibility constraints. These guidelines aim to provide evidence-based, practical strategies to optimize care for patients with endometrial cancer while addressing unmet clinical needs and adapting global advancements to Korea's healthcare environment.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

To update the recommendations issued by the National Cancer Institute (INCa) on the management of women with abnormal cervical cytology.

Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in children. However, there is considerable variation in surgical management practices worldwide, highlighting the need for standardized Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG).

The Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (SPIWG) of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) aimed to formulate recommendations on the imaging modalities and minimal technical requirements for abdominopelvic imaging in the follow-up of adult patients treated for testicular germ-cell tumors (TGCT).