Treatment options for stage I/II bulky and advanced-stage disease have recently extensively changed. For decades in North America, ABVD (doxorubicin hydrochloride [Adriamycin], bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine) has been a frontline standard-of-care option for patients with advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Recent data on combining brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine demonstrated improved overall survival compared with ABVD but increased adverse events (AEs). We hypothesized that replacing vinblastine with nivolumab (brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab [AN] + doxorubicin and dacarbazine [AD]; AN+AD) may improve efficacy and safety. This phase 2, open-label multipart, multicenter study enrolled patients with treatment-naive stage II bulky or III/IV cHL. Patients received ≤6 cycles of AN+AD; granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis was optional, per institutional guidelines. At the time of planned analysis (N = 57), complete response (CR) and objective response rates were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.3-94.9) and 93% (95% CI, 83.0-98.1), respectively. With a median follow-up of 24.2 months (95% CI, 23.4-26.9), the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 88% (95% CI, 75.7-94.6); 88% (95% CI, 75.7-94.6) had a response lasting >2 years. Most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were alanine aminotransferase increased (11%) and neutropenia (9%); 44% had treatment-related peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1/2, 40%; grade 3, 4%). No febrile neutropenia occurred; 49% received G-CSF prophylaxis. AN+AD led to a high CR rate and favorable safety profile. Further evaluation of programmed death receptor 1 inhibitor and CD30 antibody-drug conjugate combination regimens in frontline advanced-stage cHL is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03646123 and www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as #EudraCT 2020-004027-17.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is an increasingly used treatment for hematologic malignancies. Although posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PtCy) has improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in haplo-HCT, patients continue to experience life-threatening complications. Interferon gamma and interleukin-6 are central in the pathophysiology of GVHD and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and both cytokines signal through Janus kinase 1 (JAK-1). We tested the effect of adding the JAK-1 selective inhibitor, itacitinib, to PtCy-haplo-HCT to mitigate these complications and improve overall survival (OS). This open-label, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of itacitinib combined with standard GVHD prophylaxis after haplo-HCT. A total of 42 patients were treated with itacitinib 200 mg daily from day -3 through +100 or +180, followed by a taper. Itacitinib resulted in low CRS grades, all patients had grade 0 (22%) or grade 1 (78%) CRS and there were no cases of grade 2 to 5 CRS. There were no cases of primary graft failure. No patients developed grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD (aGVHD) through day +180. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 aGVHD at day +100 was 21.9%. The 1-year cumulative incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD was 5%. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 14%. OS at 1 year was 80%. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at day 180 was 8%. Itacitinib, when added to standard GVHD prophylaxis, was well tolerated and resulted in low rates of CRS, acute and chronic GVHD, and NRM, and encouraging rates of GVHD-free relapse-free survival and OS after haplo-HCT. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03755414.

Approximately 30% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) express CD7 on their myeloblasts. We have previously demonstrated that single-chain variable fragment (scFv)-based "naturally selected" CD7 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (NS7CAR-T) therapy shows significant efficacy, with a favorable safety profile in T-cell lymphoid malignancies. Here, we derived dual variable heavy-chain domain of a heavy-chain antibody (dVHH) NS7CAR-Ts that have superior CD7 binding specificity, affinity to their scFv-based counterparts, and improved proliferative capability. In this phase 1 clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of nanobody-based dVHH NS7CAR-Ts for patients with CD7+ refractory/relapsed AML. A cohort of 10 patients received dVHH NS7CAR-Ts across 2 dosage levels of 5 × 105/kg and 1 × 106/kg. Before enrollment, patients had undergone a median of 8 (range, 3-17) prior lines of therapy. Seven patients had prior transplants. After NS7CAR-T infusion, 7 of 10 (70%) patients achieved complete remission (CR). The median observation time was 178 days (range, 28-776). Among 7 patients who achieved CR, 3 who relapsed from prior transplants underwent a second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). One patient remained leukemia free on day 401, and the other 2 died on day 241 and day 776, respectively, from nonrelapse-related causes. Three CR patients without consolidative (allo-HSCT) relapsed within 90 days. All the nonresponders and relapsed patients had CD7 loss. The treatment was well tolerated, with 80% experiencing mild cytokine release syndrome and none had neurotoxicity. This trial underscores the potential promising treatment of dVHH NS7CAR-Ts in providing clinical benefits with a manageable safety profile to patients with CD7+ AML, warranting further investigation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04938115.

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) are rare autoimmune hemolytic anemias characterized by red blood cell destruction, largely attributable to complement activation resulting in intravascular and extravascular hemolysis. Pegcetacoplan is a subcutaneously administered C3-targeted therapy, which may be suitable for treating CAD and wAIHA. In this open-label phase 2 study, analyses were conducted in 2 cohorts, 1 for patients with CAD and the other for those with wAIHA. In each cohort, patients were randomly assigned to receive pegcetacoplan 270 mg/d or 360 mg/d for up to 48 weeks. Safety end points included the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI). Efficacy end points included change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb), lactate dehydrogenase, absolute reticulocyte count, haptoglobin, indirect bilirubin, and functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-fatigue scale. Thirteen of 13 (100%) and 10 of 11 (91%) patients with CAD and wAIHA, respectively, experienced at least 1 TEAE. Ten patients had at least 1 serious AE; none were considered related to pegcetacoplan. The only treatment-related AESIs were injection site reactions. Pegcetacoplan increased Hb levels, reduced hemolysis, and increased FACIT-fatigue scale scores in the first weeks; at week 48 the median (interquartile range) change from baseline Hb for the CAD and wAIHA total groups was 2.4 (0.90-3.00) and 1.7 g/dL (-1.40 to 2.90), respectively, and improvements in hemolysis and FACIT-fatigue scale scores were maintained. This study demonstrated that pegcetacoplan is generally well tolerated and suggests it can be effective for patients with CAD and wAIHA. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03226678.

Despite several approved therapies, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease with high unmet medical need. "Off-the-shelf" T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) have demonstrated high objective response rates in heavily pretreated patients with MM; however, primary resistance, short duration of response, and relapse driven by antigen shift frequently occur. Although GPRC5D represents the most selective target in MM, recent findings indicate antigen loss occurs more frequently than with BCMA. Thus, anti-GPRC5D immunotherapies must hit hard during a short period of time. Here, we characterize forimtamig, a novel GPRC5D-targeting TCB with 2+1 format. Bivalent binding of forimtamig to GPRC5D confers higher affinity than classical 1+1 TCB formats correlating with formation of more stable immunological synapses and higher potency in tumor cell killing and T-cell activation. Using an orthotopic mouse model of MM, forimtamig recruited T effector cells to the bone marrow and induced rapid tumor killing even after the introduction of step-up dosing to mitigate cytokine release. Combination of forimtamig with standard-of-care agents including anti-CD38 antibodies, immunomodulatory drugs, and proteasome inhibitors improved depth and duration of response. The combination of forimtamig with novel therapeutic agents including BCMA TCB and cereblon E3 ligase modulatory drugs was potent and prevented occurrence of GPRC5D -negative tumor relapse. Forimtamig is currently being evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials in patients with relapsed and refractory MM for monotherapy and in combination treatments. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04557150.

In an open prospective, multicenter study enrolling 48 selected patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who achieved complete response for 1 year on thrombopoietin receptor agonists, half of the patients maintained a sustained response off treatment 4 years after treatment discontinuation.

Mosunetuzumab, a CD20×CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. We present updated efficacy and safety data of a pivotal phase 1/2 study after a median follow-up of 37.4 months in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and ≥2 prior lines of therapy treated with fixed-duration mosunetuzumab. Investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate and objective response rate were 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.1-70.2) and 77.8% (95% CI, 67.8-85.9), respectively. Among 70 responders, median duration of response was 35.9 months (95% CI, 20.7 to not estimable [NE]). Among 54 patients who achieved CR, 49 remained in CR at the end of treatment; median duration of CR was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 33.0 to NE); Kaplan-Meier-estimated 30-month remission rate was 72.4% (95% CI, 59.2-85.6). Estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) rate was 82.4% (95% CI, 73.8-91.0); median OS was NR (95% CI, NE to NE). Median progression-free survival was 24.0 months (95% CI, 12.0 to NE). Median time to CD19+ B-cell recovery was 18.4 months (95% CI, 12.8-25.0) after 8 cycles of mosunetuzumab treatment. No new cytokine release syndrome events or fatal, serious, or grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. With extended follow-up, mosunetuzumab demonstrated high response rates, durable remissions, and manageable safety with no long-term concerns. This supports outpatient mosunetuzumab administration as an off-the-shelf, fixed-duration, safe, and effective treatment for patients with R/R FL, including those with high-risk disease. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

Antibiotic (ABX)-induced microbiome dysbiosis is widespread in oncology, adversely affecting outcomes and side effects of various cancer treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies. In this study, we observed that prior exposure to broad-spectrum ABXs with extended anaerobic coverage such as piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem was associated with worse anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy survival outcomes in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (N = 422) than other ABX classes. In a discovery subset of these patients (n = 67), we found that the use of these ABXs was in turn associated with substantial dysbiosis of gut microbiome function, resulting in significant alterations of the gut and blood metabolome, including microbial effectors such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and other anionic metabolites, findings that were largely reproduced in an external validation cohort (n = 58). Broader evaluation of circulating microbial metabolites revealed reductions in indole and cresol derivatives, as well as trimethylamine N-oxide, in patients who received ABX treatment (discovery, n = 40; validation, n = 28). These findings were recapitulated in an immune-competent CAR-T mouse model, in which meropenem-induced dysbiosis led to a systemic dysmetabolome and decreased murine anti-CD19 CAR-T efficacy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SCFAs can enhance the metabolic fitness of CAR-Ts, leading to improved tumor killing capacity. Together, these results suggest that broad-spectrum ABX deplete metabolically active commensals whose metabolites are essential for enhancing CAR-T efficacy, shedding light on the intricate relationship between ABX exposure, microbiome function and their impact on CAR-T efficacy. This highlights the potential for modulating the microbiome to augment CAR-T immunotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT06218602.

TP53-mutant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with poor survival outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study of zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (BOVen) in untreated patients with MCL with a TP53 mutation. Patients initially received 160 mg zanubrutinib twice daily and obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg was given on cycle 1 day 1, 8, and 15, and on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. After 2 cycles, venetoclax was added with weekly dose ramp-up to 400 mg daily. After 24 cycles, if patients were in complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) using an immunosequencing assay, treatment was discontinued. The primary end point was met if ≥11 patients were progression free at 2 years. The study included 25 patients with untreated MCL with a TP53 mutation. The best overall response rate was 96% (24/25) and the complete response rate was 88% (22/25). Frequency of uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-5 and uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-6 at cycle 13 was 95% (18/19) and 84% (16/19), respectively. With a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the 2-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were 72%, 91%, and 76%, respectively. Common side effects were generally low grade and included diarrhea (64%), neutropenia (32%), and infusion-related reactions (24%). BOVen was well tolerated and met its primary efficacy end point in TP53-mutant MCL. These data support its use and ongoing evaluation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03824483.

Glutamine dependency has been shown to be a metabolic vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prior studies using several in vivo AML models showed that depletion of plasma glutamine, induced by long-acting crisantaspase (pegcrisantaspase [PegC]) was synergistic with the B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax (Ven), resulting in significantly reduced leukemia burden and enhanced survival. Here, we report a phase 1 study of the combination of Ven and PegC (VenPegC) for treating adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML, including patients who had previously received Ven. The primary end points were the incidence of regimen-limiting toxicities (RLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Twenty-five patients received at least 1 PegC dose with Ven, and 18 efficacy-evaluable patients completed at least 1 VenPegC cycle; 12 (67%) had previously received Ven. Hyperbilirubinemia was the RLT and occurred in 60% of patients treated with VenPegC; 20% had grade ≥3 bilirubin elevations. MTD was determined to be Ven 400 mg daily with biweekly PegC 750 IU/m2. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in 25 patients who received VenPegC included antithrombin III decrease (52%), elevated transaminases (36%-48%), fatigue (28%), and hypofibrinogenemia (24%). No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic adverse events or clinical pancreatitis were observed. The overall complete remission rate in efficacy-evaluable patients was 33%. Response correlated with alterations in proteins involved in messenger RNA translation. In patients with RUNX1 mutations, the composite complete remission rate was 100%. This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04666649.

A robust prognostic and biological classification for newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) using molecular profiling remains challenging. FL tumors from patients treated in the RELEVANCE trial with rituximab-chemotherapy (R-chemo) or rituximab-lenalidomide (R2) were analyzed using RNA sequencing, DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Unsupervised gene clustering identified 2 gene expression signatures (GSs) enriched in normal memory (MEM) B cells and germinal center (GC) B-cell signals, respectively. These 2 GSs were combined into a 20-gene predictor (FL20) to classify patients into MEM-like (n = 160) or GC-like (n = 164) subtypes, which also displayed different mutational profiles. In the R-chemo arm, patients with MEM-like FL had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with GC-like FL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; P = .0023). In the R2 arm, both subtypes had comparable PFS, demonstrating that R2 has a benefit over R-chemo for patients with MEM-like FL (HR, 0.54; P = .011). The prognostic value of FL20 was validated in an independent FL cohort with R-chemo treatment (GSE119214 [n = 137]). An IHC algorithm (FLcm) that used FOXP1, LMO2, CD22, and MUM1 antibodies was developed with significant prognostic correlation with FL20. These data indicate that FL tumors can be classified into MEM-like and GC-like subtypes that are biologically distinct and clinically different in their risk profile. The FLcm assay can be used in routine clinical practice to identify patients with MEM-like FL who might benefit from therapies other than R-chemo, such as the R2 combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01476787 and #NCT01650701.

Dasatinib is an effective treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute leukemia, but some patients develop resistance. Combination treatment with dasatinib and asciminib, an allosteric inhibitor of BCR::ABL1, may deepen responses and prevent the emergence of dasatinib-resistant clones. In this phase 1 study (NCT03595017), 24 adults with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 22; p190, n = 16; p210, n = 6) and chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast crisis (n = 2) were treated with escalating daily doses of asciminib in combination with dasatinib 140 mg daily plus prednisone 60 mg/m2 daily to determine the maximum tolerated dose. After a 28-day induction, dasatinib and asciminib were continued indefinitely or until hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 33-85; 50% aged ≥65 years). The recommended phase 2 dose of asciminib was 80 mg daily in combination with dasatinib and prednisone. The dose limiting toxicity at 160 mg daily was asymptomatic grade 3 pancreatic enzyme elevation without symptomatic pancreatitis. There were no vaso-occlusive events. Among patients with de novo ALL, the complete hematologic remission rates at days 28 and 84 were 84% and 100%, respectively. At day 84, 100% of patients achieved complete cytogenetic remission, 89% achieved measurable residual disease negativity (<0.01%) by multicolor flow cytometry, and 74% and 26% achieved BCR::ABL1 reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction <0.1% and <0.01%, respectively. Dual BCR::ABL1 inhibition with dasatinib and asciminib is safe with encouraging activity in patients with de novo Ph+ ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02081378.

This phase 2 trial assessed high-dose IV ascorbic acid in TET2 mutant clonal cytopenia. Eight of 10 patients were eligible for response assessment, with no responses at week 20 by International Working Group Myelodysplasia Syndromes/Neoplasms criteria. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03418038.

The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax has shown promise for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying patients likely to respond remains a challenge, especially for those with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. We evaluated the utility of ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity testing to predict treatment responses to venetoclax-azacitidine in a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial. The trial recruited 104 participants with previously untreated (n = 48), R/R (n = 39), or previously treated secondary AML (sAML) (n = 17). The primary end point was complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) rate in ex vivo sensitive trial participants during the first 3 therapy cycles. The key secondary end points included the correlations between ex vivo drug sensitivity, responses, and survival. Venetoclax sensitivity was successfully assessed in 102 of 104 participants, with results available within a median of 3 days from sampling. In previously untreated AML, ex vivo sensitivity corresponded to an 85% (34/40) CR/CRi rate, with a median overall survival (OS) of 28.7 months, compared with 5.5 months for ex vivo resistant patients (P = .002). For R/R/sAML, ex vivo sensitivity resulted in a 62% CR/CRi rate (21/34) and median OS of 9.7 vs 3.3 months for ex vivo resistant patients (P < .001). In univariate and multivariate analysis, ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity was the strongest predictor for a favorable treatment response and survival. This trial demonstrates the feasibility of integrating ex vivo drug testing into clinical practice to identify patients with AML, particularly in the R/R setting, who benefit from venetoclax. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04267081.

No randomized trial has directly compared daratumumab and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance with standard-of-care lenalidomide (R) alone after transplant. Herein, we report the primary results of the phase 3 AURIGA study evaluating D-R vs R maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had very good or better partial response, were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (10-5) and anti-CD38-naïve after transplant. Two hundred patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to D-R (n = 99) or R (n = 101) maintenance for up to 36 cycles. The MRD-negative (10-5) conversion rate by 12 months from start of maintenance (primary end point) was significantly higher for D-R than R (50.5% vs 18.8%; odds ratio [OR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.37-8.57; P < .0001). MRD-negative (10-6) conversion rate was similarly higher with D-R (23.2% vs 5.0%; OR, 5.97; 95% CI, 2.15-16.58; P = .0002). At median follow-up (32.3 months), D-R achieved a higher overall MRD-negative (10-5) conversion rate (D-R, 60.6% vs R, 27.7%; OR, 4.12; 95% CI, 2.26-7.52; P < .0001) and complete response rate or better (75.8% vs 61.4%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.08-3.69; P = .0255) vs R. Progression-free survival (PFS) favored D-R vs R (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97); estimated 30-month PFS rates were 82.7% for D-R and 66.4% for R. Incidences of grade 3/4 cytopenias (54.2% vs 46.9%) and infections (18.8% vs 13.3%) were slightly higher with D-R than R. In conclusion, D-R maintenance achieved a higher MRD-negative conversion rate and improved PFS after transplant vs R, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03901963.

Dexamethasone is a key component of induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), despite common toxicities, including hyperglycemia and insomnia. In the randomized ECOG E4A03 trial, dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly was associated with lower mortality than higher doses. However, the performance of dexamethasone dose reductions below this threshold with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NDMM has not been fully characterized. We conducted a secondary pooled analysis of the SWOG 0777 and SWOG 1211 studies of NDMM, which used lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone, with or without bortezomib, and with or without elotuzumab. The planned dexamethasone intensity was 40 to 60 mg weekly in all arms. Patients were categorized into FD-DEX (full-dose dexamethasone maintained throughout induction) or LD-DEX (lowered-dose dexamethasone or discontinuation; only permitted for grade 3+ toxicities per both study protocols). Of the 541 evaluated patients, the LD-DEX group comprised 373 patients (69%). There were no differences in PFS or OS between the FD-DEX and LD-DEX groups, which were balanced in terms of age, stage, and performance status. Predictors of PFS and OS in the multivariate models were treatment arm, age ≥70 years, and thrombocytopenia. FD-DEX did not significantly improve either outcome. Our study suggests that dexamethasone dose reductions are common in multiple myeloma, even within clinical trials. Given the many toxicities and unclear benefits of dexamethasone in the era of modern treatment regimens, dexamethasone dose reduction during NDMM induction warrants further prospective studies. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00644228 and NCT01668719.

A metronomic, low-dose schedule of decitabine and venetoclax was safe and effective in myeloid malignancies with few dose reductions or interruptions in an older diverse population. Median overall survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a TP53-mutation was 16.1 and 11.3 months, respectively. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05184842.

The ALPINE trial established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; here, we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.84), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). Although median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common nonhematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs 6 cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03734016.

Children with ETV6::RUNX1 or high-hyperdiploid B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have favorable outcomes. The St. Jude (SJ) classification considers these patients low risk, regardless of their National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk classification, except when there is slow minimal residual disease (MRD) response or central nervous system/testicular involvement. We analyzed outcomes in children (aged 1-18.99 years) with these genotypes in the SJ Total XV/XVI studies (2000-2017). Patients with ETV6::RUNX1 (n = 222) or high-hyperdiploid (n = 296) B-ALL had 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 97.7% ± 1.1% and 94.7% ± 1.4%, respectively. For ETV6::RUNX1, EFS was comparable between NCI standard-risk and high-risk patients and between SJ low-risk and standard-risk patients. Of the 40 NCI high-risk patients, 37 who received SJ low-risk therapy had excellent EFS (97.3% ± 2.8%). For high-hyperdiploid B-ALL, NCI high-risk patients had worse EFS than standard-risk patients (87.6% ± 4.5% vs 96.4% ± 1.3%; P = .016). EFS was similar for NCI standard-risk and high-risk patients classified as SJ low risk (96.0% ± 1.5% and 96.9% ± 3.2%; P = .719). However, EFS was worse for NCI high-risk patients than for NCI standard-risk patients receiving SJ standard/high-risk therapy (77.4% ± 8.2% vs 98.0% ± 2.2%; P = .004). NCI high-risk patients with ETV6::RUNX1 or high-hyperdiploid B-ALL who received SJ low-risk therapy had lower incidences of thrombosis (P = .013) and pancreatitis (P = .011) than those who received SJ standard/high-risk therapy. MRD-directed therapy yielded excellent outcomes, except for NCI high-risk high-hyperdiploid B-ALL patients with slow MRD response, who require new treatment approaches. Among NCI high-risk patients, 93% with ETV6::RUNX1 and 54% with high-hyperdiploid B-ALL experienced excellent outcomes with a low-intensity regimen. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00137111 and #NCT00549848.

Outcomes are poor in triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.