In the Australian therapeutic trial in patients with mild diastolic hypertension, univariate analysis of possible prognostic characteristics (covariates) at the time of entry into the study showed a higher incidence of trial end points, mainly events due to ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, in older subjects, men, cigarette smokers, and those with higher systolic blood pressures and lower body mass indexes than in their complementary groups. There was a lower incidence of these events in actively treated subjects than in control subjects at both high and low levels of incidence of each covariate considered, but treatment benefit was most marked in those with lower serum cholesterol levels and lower systolic blood pressures. Multivariate regression analyses of data from men and women separately, performed with the Cox proportional-hazards model, confirmed that the incidence of trial end points increased with age and with systolic blood pressure, and showed higher rates in cigarette smokers, which increased markedly with decreasing body weight. With respect to the effects of treatment, the multivariate analysis showed an increasing benefit with decreasing body weight in smokers. The apparent relationship of treatment benefit to systolic blood pressure in the univariate analysis did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. The greater benefit from treatment related to lower levels of serum cholesterol found in the univariate analysis was also found in several preliminary multivariate analyses, but did not reach statistical significance in the final model. However, this relationship should be tested in other therapeutic trials in progress or recently completed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To determine the influence of adjunctive treatment with coumadin or aspirin on recurrence rate after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 248 patients in whom PTCA was assessed to be a primary success were randomized to either 325 mm aspirin daily or to coumadin treatment sufficient to maintain a prothrombin time 2 to 2.5 times the control value. The follow-up protocol included stress testing and coronary angiographic examinations 3 to 6 months after PTCA. All patients were followed for at least 9 months. Of the 122 patients randomized to coumadin 44 (36%) had recurrent stenoses as opposed to 34/126 (27%) of patients on aspirin, a difference that did not reach statistical significance at the .05 level. However, patients with at least a 6 month history of angina demonstrated a significantly different response to adjunctive treatment in that 19/43 (44%) of coumadin patients as compared with 10/48 (21%) of aspirin patients had recurrent stenoses (p less than .05). Thus, coumadin was not shown to be more effective than aspirin as adjunctive treatment after PTCA, while aspirin was shown to be superior to coumadin in patients with a longer history of angina.

In a randomized double-blind trial we sought to determine whether short-term therapy with ticlopidine (250 mg bid for 14 days) inhibited platelet deposition on Dacron aortic bifurcation grafts that had been in place a year or longer. A total of 10 men, 42 to 69 years old, underwent indium-111 platelet imaging during both placebo and drug phases of the trial at 24, 48, and 72 hr after the injection of labeled platelets. Platelet accumulation was quantitated by a graft/blood ratio that compared background-corrected activity of indium-111-labeled platelets in the graft with whole-blood activity of indium-111-labeled platelets. Additionally, blinded qualitative visual analysis of the unprocessed images was used to compare graft area activity with activity in adjacent native arteries. Ticlopidine significantly prolonged the template bleeding time from 5.3 +/- 0.5 to 17.1 +/- 3.1 min (+/- SEM) (p = .003). However, by quantitative analysis there was no significant reduction in platelet deposition in the graft during ticlopidine therapy compared with placebo at 24 hr (graft/blood ratio 2.3 +/- 0.4 vs 2.6 +/- 0.3), 48 hr (3.1 +/- 0.5 vs 3.2 +/- 0.4), or 72 hr (3.9 +/- 0.7 vs 4.0 +/- 0.6) after injection of labeled platelets. By visual analysis, nine patients had positive results for abnormal platelet deposition when on placebo that were unchanged when on ticlopidine. The tenth patient had an equivocal result for abnormal platelet deposition when on placebo and a negative result for abnormal platelet deposition when on ticlopidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of clonidine, naloxone, and their combination on arterial blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and hemodynamic and biochemical parameters were examined in 29 patients with essential hypertension. Treatment for 3 days with 0.3 mg/day clonidine reduced BP and HR, and these effects were quickly reversed by a single injection of 0.4 mg iv naloxone in 17 of the patients (responders), but not in the remaining 12 (nonresponders). Responders had higher control values for cardiac output, stroke index, plasma renin activity (PRA), and plasma epinephrine levels than did nonresponders. Basal BP was similar in the two groups, but clonidine decreased BP, PRA, and plasma epinephrine more in responders than in nonresponders. Naloxone given during placebo treatment had no significant effects. During clonidine treatment naloxone increased BP, HR, total peripheral resistance, PRA, and plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine, and decreased stroke volume in responders, whereas in nonresponders its only effect was a small increase in HR. It is concluded that in a subset of hyperadrenergic, hypertensive patients the antihypertensive effect of clonidine involves a naloxone-reversible inhibition of central sympathetic outflow, probably mediated by the release of an endogenous opioid.

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Type II Coronary Intervention Study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the efficacy of reduction in cholesterol levels induced by cholestyramine on progression of coronary artery disease (CAD). The rate of CAD progression in patients treated with cholestyramine plus diet was compared with that of patients treated with placebo plus diet. CAD progression was defined angiographically. Significant decrease in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) and increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), as well as in HDLc/TC and HDLc/LDLc ratios, were observed with cholestyramine. HDLc change was due to increase in HDL2A and HDL2B. When the relationship between CAD progression and lipid changes was examined independent of specific treatment group, a significant inverse relationship was found between progression at 5 years and the combination of an increase in HDLc and a decrease in LDLc; changes in HDLc/TC and HDLc/LDLc were the best predictors of CAD change. While the testing of these relationships independent of treatment group was not part of the initial study design, the trends were observed in both the placebo-treated and cholestyramine-treated groups. Moreover, with multivariate analysis, the effect of cholestyramine treatment on CAD progression was eliminated by adding changes in HDLc/TC to the regression model. These findings support the hypothesis that increases in HDLc and decreases in TC (or LDLc) can prevent or delay CAD progression.

In the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Type II Coronary Intervention Study, patients with Type II hyperlipoproteinemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) were placed on a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet and then were randomly allocated to receive either 6 g cholestyramine four times daily or placebo. This double-blind study evaluated the effects of cholestyramine on the progression of CAD as assessed by angiography. Diet alone reduced the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 6% in both groups. After randomization, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased another 5% in the placebo group and 26% in the cholestyramine-treated group. Coronary angiography was performed in 116 patients before and after 5 years of treatment. CAD progressed in 49% (28 of 57) of the placebo-treated patients vs 32% (19 of 59) of the cholestyramine-treated patients (p less than .05). When only definite progression was considered, 35% (20 of 57) of the placebo-treated patients vs 25% (15 of 59) of the cholestyramine-treated patients exhibited definite progression; the difference was not statistically significant. However, when this analysis was performed with adjustment for baseline inequalities of risk factors, effect of treatment was more pronounced. Of lesions causing 50% or greater stenosis at baseline, 33% of placebo-treated and 12% of cholestyramine-treated patients manifested lesion progression (p less than .05). Similar analyses with other end points (percent of baseline lesions that progressed, lesions that progressed to occlusion, lesions that regressed, size of lesion change, and all cardiovascular end points) all favored the cholestyramine-treated group, but were not statistically significant. Thus, although the sample size does not allow a definitive conclusion to be drawn, this study suggests that cholestyramine treatment retards the rate of progression of CAD in patients with Type II hyperlipoproteinemia.

This placebo-controlled, double-blind, longitudinal crossover study compares the efficacy of disopyramide and ethmozine, a new investigational drug, in suppressing frequent (40 or more per hour) ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) in 27 patients completing a 37 day protocol. Although both drugs significantly reduced VPDs relative to placebo, ethmozine was a superior antiarrhythmic drug in ach9eving near-total abolition of VPDs (30% of patients), which was never observed during disopyramide dosing (p less than .05). At the 80% VPD reduction level, ethmozine was effective in 56% of all patients compared with an effectiveness in only 22% of patients during disopyramide therapy (p less than .05). The mean peak plasma level of ethmozine was 0.66 +/- 0.8 micrograms/ml, which significantly fell to a trough level of 0.1 +/- 0.08 micrograms/ml (p less than .001). Mean peak and trough plasma levels of disopyramide exhibited less fluctuation (2.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml vs 2.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml). Ethmozine had no effect on the QT interval, whereas disopyramide prolonged it significantly. Importantly, while disopyramide produced serious side effects in 30% of patients, ethmozine was well tolerated with no statistically significant side effects compared with placebo.

In a controlled, randomized, double-blind study we investigated the long-term effects of the beta 1-adrenoceptor agonist prenalterol in 16 patients with severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV). Previous to and 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after continuous oral intake of 40 to 120 mg prenalterol a day, catheterization of the right heart combined with an ergometer test was carried out; M mode and two dimensional echocardiograms as well as systolic time intervals were also recorded. With prenalterol the heart rate increased within 1 week from 81 +/- 7 to 90 +/- 7 beats/min (mean +/- SD) (p less than .05) and remained increased after 3 months (93 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than .01) and 6 months (91 +/- 6 beats/min, p less than .05). After 1 week the cardiac index rose from 2.7 +/- 0.7 to 3.3 +/- 0.7 l/min/m2 (p less than .01), and after 3 and 6 months it fell again to 3.0 +/- 0.9 l/min/m2 and 2.9 +/- 0.7 l/min/m2, respectively. In the ergometer test the improvement in performance was not significant. The mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening initially increased from 0.58 +/- 0.20 to 0.79 +/- 0.28 circumferences/sec (p less than .01), but dropped after 3 months to 0.62 +/- 0.31 circumferences/sec. The ejection fraction determined from the two-dimensional echocardiogram rose after 1 week from 20 +/- 10 to 27 +/- 12% (p less than .05), but decreased again after 3 months (23 +/- 11%) and 6 months (20 +/- 10%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fifteen patients with congestive cardiomyopathy (six idiopathic and nine alcoholic) manifested by heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) were randomly assigned to a protocol in which dobutamine (n = 8) or 5% dextrose in water (n = 7) was infused continuously for 72 hr. The dose of dobutamine was titrated to increase cardiac output to twice the baseline values. The patients were evaluated before infusion, shortly after infusion, and 1, 2, and 4 weeks thereafter. Functional class improved in six of eight dobutamine-treated patients but in only two of seven control patients during the 4 week observation period. Maximal exercise time and left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly above baseline only in the dobutamine group. However, neither dobutamine nor placebo infusion produced significant changes shortly after infusion in heart rate, cardiac index, or total peripheral vascular resistance at rest or during exercise at similar workloads. The group receiving dobutamine did show a reduction in systemic systolic and pulmonary arterial mean and diastolic pressure at rest (123 +/- 5 to 108 +/- 6, 32 +/- 5, to 24 +/- 3, and 26 +/- 4 to 20 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively). In addition, total body oxygen consumption during similar workloads was lower after dobutamine infusion than before.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In 14 consecutive patients with variant angina we investigated the possible role of coronary alpha-adrenergic receptors in the genesis of coronary spasm. In eight patients, computerized, beat-by-beat analysis of the electrocardiogram recorded during continuous Holter monitoring failed to reveal any increase of heart rate and corrected QT interval (both indexes of cardiac sympathetic activation) in the period preceding the onset of ST segment changes in 197 episodes of ischemia caused by coronary spasm. In the same patients, analysis of the circadian distribution of ischemic episodes revealed a significantly higher incidence in the early morning hours, when sympathetic activity is at the lowest level. Twelve patients underwent serial provocative testing with cold pressor, phenylephrine, or norepinephrine infusion and administration of ergonovine maleate. Ergonovine consistently reproduced coronary spasm in all 12 patients, while results of cold pressor testing were positive in only one. Infusion of phenylephrine (eight patients) or norepinephrine after beta-blockade (four patients) failed to precipitate myocardial ischemia. In five patients infusion of phentolamine at the highest tolerated dose did not reduce significantly the number of ischemic attacks when compared with placebo. In contrast to results of previous reports, our data seem to rule out the hypothesis that an increase of sympathetic outflow to the heart plays an important role in the genesis of coronary spasm. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility of localized alpha-stimulation of epicardial arteries.

Intravenous nitroglycerin (NG) infusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to improve left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion and to decrease ischemic injury and creatine kinase (CK) indexes of infarct size. To determine whether early NG infusions in patients with AMI decreases the extent of left ventricular asynergy, we used two-dimensional echocardiography to measure asynergic segments (akinesis and/or dyskinesis) at four serial short-axis levels from base to apex (mitral, M; chordal, C; midpapillary, MP; low papillary, LP) in 22 patients with a first anterior AMI. Patients were randomized between infusions of NG (n = 11) or 5% dextrose in water (controls, n = 11) within 5.6 hr after the onset of pain. NG infusion rates were titrated to lower mean arterial pressure to an average level of 7% below control (but not below 80 mm Hg) and were maintained at this level for the duration of the infusions (39 hr). After NG, left ventricular function improved as left ventricular filling pressure decreased (p less than .005), and sigma ST on precordial ST segment mapping decreased (p less than .001). These parameters did not change in control subjects. Computed CK infarct size was smaller in the NG group than in the control group (p less than .05). Before the infusions, the mean extent of left ventricular asynergy (% left ventricular circumference) were similar in both groups: M, 18% vs 21%; C, 22% vs 23%; MP, 26% vs 24%; LP, 32% vs 29%. In addition, the computed total left ventricular asynergy (% surface area) was also similar for these two groups before therapy (25% vs 25%). There was no change in left ventricular asynergy from pretreatment values by 1 hr and 10 days among control subjects: M, 18% vs 18% vs 17%; C, 22% vs 22%; MP, 26% vs 26% vs 22%; LP, 32% vs 33% vs 33%; total 25% vs 25% vs 24% (multiple measures analysis of variance). In contrast, there was a significant decrease (p less than .001) in left ventricular asynergy from pretreatment values by 1 hr and 10 days with NG: M, 21% vs 10% vs 8%; C, 23% vs 12% vs 10%; MP, 24% vs 13% vs 9%; LP, 29% vs 14% vs 10%; total, 25% vs 12% vs 9%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

With the use of equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography the effects on left ventricular (LV) function of 160 mg oral propranolol daily and 360 mg verapamil daily alone and in combination were compared in 18 patients with chronic exertional angina. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover protocol was used. The reduction in exercise rate-pressure product induced by the combination (118 +/- 28 mm Hg/min) was significantly greater (p less than .05) than that by propranolol (135 +/- 27 mm Hg/min) or verapamil alone (163 +/- 28 mm Hg/min). In patients at rest, neither single nor combined therapy altered global or regional left ventricular ejection fractions (EFs). Verapamil, but not propranolol, increased (p less than .05) cardiac volumes of resting subjects; used in combination, no further increase in LV volume occurred. With placebo, exercise global EF did not decrease from the level at rest and therefore no drug effect could be demonstrated for this parameter of LV function. By an evaluation of normalized regional EF measurements the combination was shown to reduce exercise-induced hypokinesis (placebo 52 +/- 20%, combination 61 +/- 23%; p less than .01). No significant improvement was noted with propranolol or verapamil alone; only the combination prevented a significant increase in end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes during exercise. Thus, propranolol and verapamil, used alone in moderate doses, exert no beneficial effect on exercise LV function as measured by EF and volume changes, and resting function deteriorates slightly with verapamil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To evaluate the relative thrombolytic efficacy and complications of intracoronary vs high-dose, short-term intravenous streptokinase infusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, we performed baseline coronary arteriography and then randomly allocated 51 patients with acute myocardial infarction to receive either intracoronary (n = 25) or intravenous (n = 26) streptokinase. Patients getting the drug by the intracoronary route received 240,000 IU of streptokinase into the infarct-related artery over 1 hr, whereas those getting the drug by the intravenous route received either 500,000 IU of streptokinase over 15 min (n = 10) or 1 million IU of streptokinase over 45 min (n = 16). Angiographically observed thrombolysis occurred in 76% (19/25) of the patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase, in 10% (1/10) of the patients receiving 500,000 IU of streptokinase intravenously, and in 44% (7/16) of the patients receiving 1 million IU of streptokinase intravenously. Among patients in whom thrombolysis was observed, mean elapsed time from onset of streptokinase infusion until lysis was 31 +/- 18 min in patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase and 38 +/- 20 min in those receiving intravenous streptokinase (p = NS). Among patients in whom intravenous streptokinase "failed," intracoronary streptokinase in combination with intracoronary guidewire manipulation recanalized only 7% (1/15). Fibrinogen levels within 6 hr after streptokinase were significantly lower in the patients receiving intravenous streptokinase (39 +/- 17 mg/dl) than the levels in those receiving intracoronary streptokinase (88 +/- 70 mg/dl) (p less than .05) but were similar 24 hr after streptokinase in the two groups. Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in one patient in each group. Thus, in this prospective randomized trial of intracoronary vs intravenous streptokinase, hemorrhagic complications were few, although both regimens produced a systemic lytic state. Although the thrombolytic efficacy of intracoronary streptokinase was superior to that of high-dose, short-term intravenous streptokinase, the higher-dose intravenous regimen (1 million IU over 45 min) achieved thrombolysis in a significant minority (44%) of patients and might be useful therapy for patients not having access to emergency catheterization.

To evaluate the comparative effects of medical and surgical therapy on quality of life of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 780 patients who had been randomly assigned to medical or surgical therapy in the CASS were systematically followed for a mean of 5.5. years. Analysis was performed according to original treatment assignment. Patients in the surgical group had significantly less chest pain, fewer activity limitations, and required less therapy with nitrates and beta-blockers. Treadmill exercise tests performed 6, 18, and 60 months after entry documented significantly longer treadmill time, less exercise-induced angina, and less ST segment depression among surgical group patients. However, employment status and recreational status did not differ significantly between medical and surgical groups. Total number of hospitalizations after randomization was higher in the surgical group owing primarily to rehospitalization during the first year of follow-up for the coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk factors, including high blood pressure, cigarette smoking, high cholesterol levels, overweight, and poor exercise habits remained similar between medical and surgical groups. This randomized collaborative study shows that coronary artery bypass graft surgery improves the quality of life as manifested by relief of chest pain, improvement in both subjective and objective measurements of functional status, and a diminished requirement for drug therapy. However, no significant effect on employment or recreational status was observed.

CASS includes a multicenter patient registry and a randomized controlled clinical trial. It is designed to assess the effect of coronary artery bypass surgery on mortality and selected nonfatal end points. From August 1975 to May 1979, 780 patients with stable ischemic heart disease were randomly assigned to receive surgical (n = 390) or nonsurgical (n = 390) treatment and were followed through April 15, 1983. At 5 years, the average annual mortality rate in patients assigned to surgical treatment was 1.1%. The annual mortality rate in those receiving medical therapy was 1.6%. Annual mortality rates in patients with single-, double-, and triple-vessel disease who were in the surgical group were 0.7%, 1.0%, and 1.5%; the corresponding rates in patients in the medical group were 1.4%, 1.2%, and 2.1%. The differences were not statistically significant. Nearly 75% of the patients had entry ejection fractions of at least 0.50. The annual mortality rates in patients in the surgical group in this subgroup with single-, double-, and triple-vessel disease were 0.8%, 0.8%, and 1.2% and corresponding rates in the medical group were 1.1%, 0.6%, and 1.2%. The annual rate of bypass surgery in patients who were initially assigned to receive medical treatment was 4.7%. The excellent survival rates observed both in CASS patients assigned to receive medical and those assigned to receive surgical therapy and the similarity of survival rates in the two groups of patients in this randomized trial lead to the conclusion that patients similar to those enrolled in this trial can safely defer bypass surgery until symptoms worsen to the point that surgical palliation is required.

We identified 420 medically treated and 231 surgically treated patients (coronary graft plus myocardial surgery in 30%) who had severe left ventricular dysfunction manifest by an ejection fraction below 0.36 and markedly abnormal wall motion. Compared with medically treated patients, those treated surgically had more severe angina (56.7% vs 29.0% class III or IV; p less than .001), less heart failure as predominant symptom (11.1% vs 18.8%; p less than .003), more severe coronary disease (66.7% vs 50.2% three-vessel disease; p less than .001), a greater concentration of left main coronary artery lesions greater than 70% (12.6% vs 3.8%: p less than .001), and a greater estimated extent of jeopardized myocardium (p less than .001). Multivariate regression analysis of survival, which adjusts for the above covariates, showed that surgical treatment prolonged survival (p less than .05), although it ranked below severity of heart failure symptoms, age, ejection fraction, and left main stenosis greater than 70% in determining prognosis. Surgical benefit was most apparent for patients with ejection fractions below 0.26 who had a 43% 5 year survival with medical treatment vs 63% with surgery. Surgically treated patients experienced substantial symptomatic benefit compared with medically treated patients if their presenting symptoms were predominantly angina; however, there was no relief of symptoms caused primarily by heart failure. We conclude that patients with predominantly ischemic pain symptoms, despite poor left ventricular function, benefit from surgery; however, operative mortality in this high-risk subset must equal or better the 6.9% obtained in this study.

We determined the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and plasma concentration-response relationships of propafenone, a promising new antiarrhythmic drug. Thirteen patients with frequent and complex ventricular premature beats were studied after receiving four increasing doses, during drug washout and during a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, to evaluate the optimal dose in each patient. A nonlinear relationship was found between propafenone dose and steady-state mean concentration with a 10-fold increase in drug concentration as dose increased threefold from 300 to 900 mg/day. There was great intersubject variability in elimination half-life (mean 6 hr, range 2.4 to 11.8), steady-state mean concentration on 900 mg/day of propafenone (mean 1008 ng/ml, range 482 to 1812), and "therapeutic" plasma concentration (mean 588 ng/ml, range 64 to 1044). The interaction of these three parameters in individual patients determined the duration of the antiarrhythmic action of propafenone during washout (mean 11.5 hr, range 4 to 22). There was a greater than 90% reduction of ventricular premature beats in 10 subjects during dose ranging and in seven during double-blind crossover. Side effects requiring discontinuation of the drug occurred in three patients and included apparent worsening of arrhythmias in two. We conclude that propafenone effectively suppresses ventricular arrhythmias and that nonlinear drug accumulation and intersubject variability in elimination of half-life, steady-state mean plasma concentration, and therapeutic concentration indicate a need for individual therapy.

Ten men with stable angina not fully relieved by optimal doses of propranolol were given on each of four mornings a single dose of 10 mg nifedipine, 120 mg verapamil, isosorbide dinitrate (5 to 30 mg, previously titrated to lower systolic blood pressure by 15 to 20 mm Hg), or placebo, in double-blind fashion. Bicycle exercise to angina was performed hourly for 8 hr thereafter. All three vasodilators increased exercise time by at least 50% by the first hour (p less than .001), with a gradually diminishing effect persisting for 6 to 8 hr (p less than .01). Although for the group there were no differences in magnitude and duration of effect among the three drugs, in five of the individual patients there were important differences in response favoring one or another vasodilator. We conclude that nifedipine, verapamil, and isosorbide dinitrate are equally effective and reasonably long-acting antianginal supplements to propranolol, although some patients may benefit more from one than another of the three.