Sustained therapy with nitroglycerin (NTG) has been reported to provoke the development of early tolerance. Because continuous intravenous NTG infusion is commonly used in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure, we evaluated the incidence of early tolerance developed within the first 24 hr of therapy in 31 responders to NTG. After documentation of response to NTG, defined as a 10 mm Hg or greater or a 30% or greater reduction in mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), 16 patients were blindly, randomly assigned to receive placebo and 15 patients were continued on same-dose NTG. Both groups showed an identical fall in PAWP at peak NTG titration (11 +/- 4 mm Hg). Discontinuation of NTG in the placebo group resulted in a rapid increase in PAWP to levels not significantly different from baseline (19 +/- 5 mm Hg at 2 hr vs 23 +/- 6 mm Hg at baseline; p = NS). In the NTG group, PAWP fell from 27 +/- 9 to 14 +/- 7 mm Hg, was 16 +/- 9 mm Hg at 2 hr (p less than .05 vs baseline), and continued to be significantly lower than baseline for 8 hr; however, due to attenuation of effect, PAWP values at 12, 20, and 24 hr were not significantly different from placebo or baseline values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

HMG-CoA reductase catalyzes the conversion of hydroxymethylglutarate to mevalonate, an important early rate-limiting step in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. Since the discovery of compactin, the first HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, by Endo et al. in 1976, several other inhibitors have been described. Those that have been investigated in the clinic include mevastatin (compactin), lovastatin (mevinolin), simvastatin (synvinolin), eptastatin (CS-514, SQ-31,000), and SRI-62320. These compounds are competitive inhibitors, with Ki values of the hydroxyacid forms of around 10(-9) M. Lovastatin (mevinolin, Mevacor), which is in the late stages of clinical development and has been administered to over 1000 subjects for up to 4 years, is the inhibitor on which the most information is available. It is given in single or divided doses of 20 to 80 mg/day, and is a very effective and usually well-tolerated lipid-lowering agent. At 40 mg bid, lovastatin produces the following approximate mean changes: total plasma cholesterol, -33%; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, -40%; very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, -35%; plasma triglycerides, -25%; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, +10%; apolipoprotein B, -20%. The substantial reduction in both LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (the principal protein component of LDL) indicates a reduction in the number of circulating LDL particles. The mechanism probably involves both decreased LDL production and increased LDL clearance.

This placebo-controlled, double-blind trial compared the hemodynamic effects of sotalol and quinidine with the use of rest and exercise gated radionuclide angiography. Patients had frequent ventricular premature depolarizations (greater than or equal to 30 VPDs/hour) and depressed cardiac function (mean ejection fraction 43 +/- 15%). Resting left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume index increased (p less than .002, p less than .001, respectively) during sotalol therapy, associated with a concomitant fall in heart rate (p less than .001). Quinidine also increased mean left ventricular ejection fraction, but less so than did sotalol (p less than .05). Quinidine significantly decreased left ventricular end-diastolic (p less than .05) and end-systolic (p less than .002) volumes, but had no effect on stroke volume index or heart rate. Neither drug affected cardiac index. Quinidine resulted in no symptomatic deterioration in left ventricular function or serious arrhythmia aggravation. In contrast, five patients on sotalol developed either decompensated congestive heart failure (two patients), arrhythmia aggravation (two patients), or hypotension associated with bradyarrhythmia (one patient). These patients had a unique hemodynamic profile that can be used to identify patients likely to have a poor outcome on sotalol. This profile reflected a lack of cardiac reserve, characterized by an inability to increase stroke volume and cardiac output with supine bicycle exercise.

During coronary angioplasty, inflation of the balloon within the coronary artery produces transient arterial occlusion and frequently results in myocardial ischemia. Delivery of oxygenated autologous blood to the myocardium at risk during inflation may help mitigate this ischemia. Accordingly, we investigated the feasibility and safety of infusing blood through the central lumen of a dilatation catheter around the guidewire using both a model in vitro and clinical trials. In the tests in vitro, fresh blood was infused at flow rates up to 120 ml/min. Hemolysis was minimal at flow rates of 60 ml/min or less (less than or equal to 0.92 +/- 0.18%), but increased exponentially at higher rates (13.64 +/- 2.37% at 120 ml/min, p less than .002). A similar pattern was observed for potassium release. Platelet and leukocyte counts did not vary significantly, and beta-thromboglobulin and muramidase remained at control levels. Although mean erythrocyte volume did not change, erythrocyte histograms and light microscopy demonstrated a subpopulation of red cell fragments averaging 25 to 40 fl in size at higher rates. A randomized, crossover clinical trial was next performed by delivery of blood perfusion at 60 ml/min to 15 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Levels of plasma hemoglobin, beta-thromboglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium remained constant before and after the perfusion and the control inflations. The maximum pain score was significantly lower with the perfusion inflation (4.1 +/- 0.8 vs 6.0 +/- 0.9, p less than .003). Relative to baseline, the maximum ST segment elevation during the perfusion inflation (0.5 +/- 0.3 mm) was nearly one-fourth that during the control inflation (1.9 +/- 0.6 mm, p less than .02). Thus, myocardial protection with oxygenated autologous blood perfusion at rates of 60 ml/min appears to be a safe and effective technique that may permit increased inflation time and extend the range of coronary angioplasty to include individuals at high risk for the procedure.

Over the past 10 years behavioral approaches to the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD) have become widely recognized as being a significant complement to traditional medical and surgical therapies. The success of approaches to secondary prevention now relate to quality, as well as quantity, of life. A multifaceted program, including dietary management, smoking cessation, physical exercise, modification of type A behavior, and psychological counseling are components of many cardiac rehabilitation programs. Behavioral interventions are effective in reducing traditional risk factors for CHD events, and for improving the quality of life among victims of a disease with significant psychological, as well as physical, consequences. However, the effectiveness of behavioral interventions for prolonging life is less certain and requires more careful evaluation. The mechanisms by which behavioral treatments may influence clinical CHD end points is also in need of further investigation.

Intravenous administration of 80 mg of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA, 40, 20, and 20 mg in successive hours) and streptokinase (SK, 1.5 million units over 1 hr) was compared in a double-blind, randomized trial in 290 patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction. These patients entered the trial within 7 hr of the onset of symptoms and underwent baseline coronary arteriography before thrombolytic therapy was instituted. Ninety minutes after the start of thrombolytic therapy, occluded infarct-related arteries had opened in 62% of 113 patients in the rt-PA and 31% of 119 patients in the SK group (p less than .001). Twice as many occluded infarct-related arteries opened after rt-PA compared with SK at the time of each of seven angiograms obtained during the first 90 min after commencing thrombolytic therapy. Regardless of the time from onset of symptoms to treatment, more arteries were opened after rt-PA than SK. The reduction in circulating fibrinogen and plasminogen and the increase in circulating fibrin split products at 3 and 24 hr were significantly less in patients treated with rt-PA than in those treated with SK (p less than .001). The occurrence of bleeding events, administration of blood transfusions, and reocclusion of the infarct-related artery was comparable in the two groups. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction, rt-PA elicited reperfusion in twice as many occluded infarct-related arteries as compared with SK at each of seven serial observations during the first 90 min after onset of treatment.

This review compares the calcium antagonists with diuretics in the management of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The antihypertensive efficacy of calcium antagonists appears comparable to that of oral diuretics such as hydrochlorothiazide when used as monotherapy. Peripheral vascular dilation appears to be the principal mechanism of the long-term blood pressure-lowering effects of both calcium antagonists and diuretics. Peripheral vasoconstrictor responses to cardioreflex-mediated sympathetic nervous system activation is attenuated by calcium antagonists but not by diuretics. Long-term calcium antagonist therapy is generally not associated with reflex activation of the sympathetic nervous system or of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, whereas diuretic therapy results in considerable activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Calcium antagonists appear to have a greater beneficial effect than diuretics with respect to maintenance of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. Calcium antagonists, because of their effects on coronary blood flow and heart rate-blood pressure product, offer advantages over diuretics in the treatment of hypertensive patients with concomitant ischemic heart disease. Metabolic abnormalities associated with diuretic antihypertensive therapy, such as hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hyperuricemia, lipid changes, and hyperglycemia, are generally not observed with calcium antagonists. Many of these deleterious metabolic changes observed with diuretic therapy may be minimized by the use of smaller doses of these agents than have generally been employed in the past. Diuretics are less expensive and require less frequent dosing than calcium antagonists. Thus, they continue to be preferable first-line antihypertensive agents in many patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Scientific rationale suggests a potentially important role for the calcium-channel blockers in the treatment of patients with coexisting systemic hypertension and coronary artery disease. Clinical investigation confirms the usefulness of these drugs as monotherapy in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina and mild-to-moderate hypertension. There are several therapeutic effects of the calcium-channel blockers in coronary artery disease. Beneficial actions on the major determinants of oxygen consumption, i.e., heart rate, blood pressure, and contractility, are generally seen. The potent coronary vasodilating actions of these drugs allow for increased coronary blood flow and alleviation of coronary vasospasm. The effectiveness of the calcium-channel blockers in hypertension appears to be primarily due to their ability to induce systemic vasodilation. Improvements in ventricular compliance, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardioprotection appear to be additional beneficial effects of the drugs. Calcium-channel blockers compare favorably with beta-blockers; they appear to be more effective than some beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly and black population and can be given to patients with bronchospasm or peripheral vascular disease. Calcium-channel blockers are a welcome addition to existing drug regimens available for the management of patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and systemic hypertension.

The rationale for evaluating the efficacy and safety of calcium entry-blocking drugs to prevent secondary complications in patients after myocardial infarction is presented. The data currently available from postinfarction trials involving verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem are critically reviewed, and a comparison of the findings from three major trials of calcium entry-blocking drugs is provided.

Twenty-four patients with unstable angina pectoris, defined as chest pain at rest with transient ST segment deviation of at least 1 mm, were randomly assigned to blinded treatment with either placebo or intravenous recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Before randomization, all patients were treated with oral beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, nitrates, and continuous intravenous heparin for a monitoring period of 12 to 28 hr. After this monitoring period the 24 patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or 1.75 mg/kg intravenous rt-PA given over 12 hr at a rate of 0.75 mg/kg over 1 hr, 0.5 mg/kg over 4 hr, and 0.5 mg/kg over 7 hr. One patient, assigned to receive placebo, developed acute myocardial infarction after randomization but before receiving the study drug. Ischemic events were recorded during a hospital follow-up period of at least 4 days unless a further intervention was indicated or the coronary angiogram was normal. The follow-up period was 7 +/- 5 days (mean +/- SD) after the placebo infusion and 8 +/- 4 days after the infusion of rt-PA. Unstable angina pectoris persisted after the completion of the infusion in six of 11 patients receiving placebo and only one of 12 patients receiving rt-PA (p less than .03). Coronary angiography, performed 38 +/- 19 hr after the infusion, demonstrated subocclusive thrombus in eight of 11 patients receiving placebo but in none of 11 patients treated with rt-PA (p less than .002). One patient on rt-PA refused coronary angiography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The use of calcium-channel blockers to treat essential hypertension is increasing, and in the United States several new drug applications for this indication are under consideration by the Food and Drug Administration. Although the ability of the calcium-channel blockers to lower blood pressure has been established, their efficacy and safety in relation to current therapy require further clarification. This article reviews studies in which calcium-channel blockers and beta-blockers have been compared, including seven with verapamil, four with nifedipine and nitrendipine and two with diltiazem. These studies indicate that the two classes of agents produce similar antihypertensive effects and are associated with a comparable incidence of adverse reactions. In addition, the preliminary findings of a multicenter trial in which 50 subjects with mild or moderate hypertension were treated with diltiazem (60 to 180 mg bid) or propranolol (80 to 240 mg bid) for 4 to 6 months are presented. Both medications significantly lowered blood pressure (from 148 +/- 17/101 +/- 5 to 133 +/- 25/88 +/- 9 mm Hg on diltiazem and from 154 +/- 22/104 +/- 6 to 146 +/- 23/91 +/- 11 mm Hg on propranolol). Fifty-nine percent of the patients on diltiazem and 40% of those on propranolol achieved the treatment goal of a supine diastolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg together with minimum 10 mm Hg reduction. In a similar study, exercise blood pressure and exercise capacity were also examined, with the most important finding being a reduction in maximal oxygen consumption and exercise duration on propranolol without a significant change on diltiazem.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

For monotherapy, beta-blockers and calcium-entry blockers are effective and safe antianginal medications. For prophylaxis of myocardial ischemia, a different mechanism of action for each class of drugs is reflected by the different heart rate and rate-pressure product during exercise. In patients who continue to have anginal symptoms despite adequate beta-blockade, further alleviation of symptoms together with an increase in exercise tolerance may be observed with the addition of a calcium-entry blocker. Of note is the individual patient response to the various calcium-entry blockers when combined with propranolol. Although of theoretic concern with combination therapy, no deleterious effect on left ventricular function or increased adverse clinical effects were noted in our studies. Combination therapy with beta-blockers and calcium-entry blockers is well tolerated, effective, and safe both over the short and long term in patients with exertional angina.

Studies in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have demonstrated an abnormal beta-adrenergic reflex vasodilation during orthostatic tilt. Baroreflex modulation of vascular resistance in patients with CHF was investigated during therapy with a vasoselective calcium antagonist, felodipine. Eight patients on conventional therapy for severe CHF were studied after a 3 week course of additional felodipine or placebo treatment under randomized, double-blind, and crossover conditions. Forearm subcutaneous vascular resistance (FSVR) was estimated with use of the local 133Xe washout. Aortic pulsatile stretch, expressed as the systolic distension in percent of diastolic diameter, was calculated from echocardiographic measurements of aortic root diameters. At 3 weeks, felodipine reduced the arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and FSVR, preserved cardiac filling pressures and heart rate, and increased cardiac output, stroke volume, and aortic pulsatile stretch. Upright tilt (45 degrees) was used to study baroreflex-mediated cardiovascular responses. The unloading of cardiopulmonary baroreceptors during upright tilt was substantial and about equal during both treatment courses, but the pulse pressure was maintained during the placebo and decreased during the felodipine period. During tilt, the patients on placebo failed to increase heart rate and their FSVR, systemic vascular resistance, and arterial mean pressure were decreased, whereas during tilt after felodipine, heart rate and systemic vascular resistance increased to maintain arterial mean pressure and FSVR also tended to increase. Both the stroke volume and aortic pulsatile stretch increased during tilt in patients on placebo but they decreased in those on felodipine. The tilt caused increments in circulating norepinephrine and epinephrine levels during both treatment regimens. Regulation of FSVR during the sympathetic stimulation of orthostatic stress was further elucidated. Proximal neural blockade caused an increase in FSVR during tilt in patients on placebo and a decrease in FSVR during tilt in those on felodipine. Local beta-adrenoceptor blockade caused similar increments in FSVR during tilt in patients on both treatments. Combined proximal and local blockade still increased FSVR during tilt in those on placebo, but caused no change in FSVR during tilt in those on felodipine. This study demonstrates that felodipine normalizes baroreflex control of vascular resistance in patients with CHF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Vasodilator Therapy of Heart Failure was designed to determine whether vasodilator drugs could alter the survival of patients with chronic congestive heart failure treated with digoxin and diuretics. Among the 642 patients entered into the study, 273 were randomly assigned to placebo, 186 were randomly assigned to the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate, and 183 patients were randomly assigned to prazosin; all patients were followed for periods ranging from 6 months to 5.7 years. Treatment with hydralazine-nitrate produced a 28% reduction in mortality compared with that in patients receiving placebo (95% confidence interval, 3% to 46%), whereas prazosin exerted no apparent beneficial effect. Data were further examined to determine if any baseline variables had an impact on the response to treatment. Mortality in the placebo group was higher in those with coronary artery disease, with a history of antiarrhythmic drug use, and with values lower than the median for ejection fraction and exercise tolerance. A reduction in mortality with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate was observed in all of the above pairs of subgroups as well as in those above and below 60 years of age and those with and without a history of hypertension or excess alcohol ingestion. The benefit of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate was particularly prominent in younger patients with a lower ejection fraction and those with a history of hypertension and without an alcoholic history.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study, we investigated in seven healthy male volunteers the effect of a low-dose aspirin regimen (35 mg acetylsalicylate per day for 7 days) on the formation of thromboxane A2 (TxA2) and prostacyclin (PGI2) in blood emerging from a standardized injury of the microvasculature made to determine skin bleeding time. When subjects were treated with placebo, there was rapid and substantial generation of TxA2 and PGI2 at the site of platelet-vessel wall interaction within the first 2 min after vascular injury. This was reflected by a greater than 100-fold and greater than 10-fold increase in thromboxane B2 (TxB2) and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha (6-keto-PGF1 alpha) in blood obtained from incisions made to determine bleeding time as compared with the corresponding plasma values. Low-dose aspirin caused a significant inhibition of both TxA2 and PGI2 generation in blood sampled from the skin incisions, represented by a 85% and 92% and 81% and 84% inhibition of TxB2 and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha, respectively, as compared with controls. We therefore conclude that rapid activation of both platelet prostaglandin metabolism and vascular PGI2 biosynthesis occurs at the site of platelet-vessel wall interaction, and low-dose aspirin results in a significant inhibition of both platelet and vascular cyclooxygenase activity. Thus, our data fail to confirm the concept of a differential effect of low-dose aspirin on platelet and vascular prostaglandin synthesis in man in vivo.