Insulin lispro is a human insulin analog that dissociates more rapidly than human regular insulin after subcutaneous injection, resulting in higher insulin levels at an earlier point in time and a shorter duration of action. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this pharmacokinetic difference would translate into better postprandial and overall control in 30 IDDM patients (age, 35.1 +/- 1.5 years; male-female ratio, 17:13; BMI, 24.8 +/- 0.5 kg/m2; HbA1c, 8.03 +/- 0.13% at baseline) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; Disetronic H-TRON V100) in a double-blind crossover clinical study. Patients were randomized to insulin lispro or human regular insulin for 3 months before crossing over to the other insulin for another 3 months. All meal boluses were given immediately before breakfast, lunch, and supper. An eight-point blood glucose profile was measured once weekly, and HbA1c levels were measured monthly. At the end of the 3-month treatment period, HbA1c levels were significantly lower with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 7.66 +/- 0.13 vs. 8.00 +/- 0.16% (P = 0.0041). While preprandial, bedtime, and 2:00 A.M. values for blood glucose were not significantly different, 1-h postprandial blood glucose was significantly improved after breakfast, lunch, and dinner with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 8.35 vs. 9.79 mmol/l (P = 0.006), 7.58 vs. 8.74 mmol/l (P = 0.049), and 7.85 vs. 9.01 mmol/l (P = 0.03). The incidence of hypoglycemia per 30 days (blood glucose levels, <3.0 mmol/l) was 8.4 +/- 1.3 before randomization, decreasing to 6.0 +/- 0.9 for insulin lispro and to 7.6 +/- 1.3 for regular insulin during the last month of the study. Two patients in each group reported insulin precipitation. We conclude that insulin lispro improves glycemic control in CSII without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Troglitazone is a thiazolidinedione under development for the treatment of NIDDM and potentially other insulin-resistant disease states. Treatment with troglitazone is associated with an improvement in hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin-mediated glucose disposal. No significant side effects have been observed in humans. Because of reported cardiac changes in animals treated with drugs of this class, this multicenter 48-week study was conducted to evaluate whether NIDDM patients treated with troglitazone develop any cardiac mass increase or functional impairment. A total of 154 NIDDM patients were randomized to receive troglitazone 800 mg q.d. or glyburide titrated to achieve glycemic control (< or =20 mg b.i.d. or q.d.). Two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed Doppler were used to measure left ventricular mass index (LVMI), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume index (SVI). All echocardiograms were performed at each center (baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks), recorded on videotape, and forwarded to a blinded central echocardiographic interpreter for analysis. The results showed that LVMI of patients treated with troglitazone was not statistically or clinically different from baseline after 24 or 48 weeks. Statistically significant increases in SVI and CI and a statistically significant decrease in diastolic pressure and estimated peripheral resistance were observed in troglitazone-treated patients. These results were not sex-specific. Glycemic benefits of troglitazone treatment were observed as evidenced by long-term improvement of HbA1c and C-peptide levels. Furthermore, triglycerides were significantly lower, and HDL was significantly higher at weeks 24 and 48. In conclusion, NIDDM patients treated with troglitazone do not show any cardiac mass increase or cardiac function impairment. Conversely, patients on troglitazone benefited from enhanced cardiac output and stroke volume, possibly as a result of decreased peripheral resistance. Treatment with troglitazone appears to have a favorable impact on known cardiovascular risk factors and could potentially lower cardiovascular morbidity in NIDDM patients.

Although the relationship between the actions of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and atherosclerosis is complex, a strong body of evidence suggests that its activity (cholesteryl ester transfer [CET]) is proatherogenic. We have previously shown that CET is increased in IDDM patients receiving conventional subcutaneous insulin treatment and normalized when systemic insulin levels are lowered with intraperitoneal insulin delivery (IP). Since CET has been found by many observers to also be accelerated in NIDDM, we sought to determine whether the same salutary effect could be achieved in insulin-requiring NIDDM men before and 7 months after randomization to an intensive treatment regimen (Rx) of either IP (n = 9) or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI; n = 13). HbA1c improved to the same degree in both groups (MDI group: 9.4 +/- 1.1% pre-Rx vs. 7.2 +/- 0.7% post-Rx [P < 0.001]; IP group: 9.2 +/- 1.3% pre-Rx vs. 7.1 +/- 0.5% post-Rx [P < 0.001]). Compared with pre-Rx levels, plasma triglycerides were not significantly changed by either treatment (MDI group: 136 +/- 80 mg/dl pre-Rx vs. 139 +/- 87 mg/dl post-Rx; IP group: 157 +/- 63 mg/dl pre-Rx vs. 188 +/- 89 mg/dl post-Rx), though an upward trend followed IP. Before randomization, CET estimated with both mass and isotopic assays was greater in the NIDDM subjects than in nondiabetic control subjects (P < 0.001). With improved glycemic control, CE mass transfer declined in both groups, but only reached normal levels in the IP group (MDI group at 2 h: 49.0 +/- 13.7 [mean +/- SD] pg pre-Rx vs. 29.5 +/- 15.3 microg post-Rx [-39.7%, P < 0.01]; IP group at 2 h: 40.8 +/- 23.3 microg pre-Rx vs. 10.9 +/- 6.5 microg post-Rx [-73.2%, P < 0.05]) and remained abnormally increased (P < 0.005) in the subjects receiving MDI. Total lipolytic activity after intensive treatment was unchanged from pretreatment levels, which were similar to those of the reference group. Although directional changes in lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) similar to those found in IDDM after MDI and IP were observed, they were not statistically significant. Thus, while improved glycemic control alone achieved by either MDI or IP reduced the pathological increase in CET in these insulin-treated NIDDM men, normalization was only achieved in those treated with IP. Despite near-normal HbA1c levels, CET remained abnormally increased in NIDDM patients treated rigorously with conventional subcutaneous insulin delivery.

A total of 1,441 patients with IDDM were randomly assigned to receive either intensive (n = 711) or conventional (n = 730) diabetes therapy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The patients were followed for an average of 6.5 years. Subjects were instructed to report all episodes of suspected severe hypoglycemia to their health care team. In addition, at quarterly follow-up visits, each subject was asked about the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia. There were 3,788 episodes of severe hypoglycemia (requiring assistance); 1,027 of these episodes were associated with coma and/or seizure. A total of 65% percent of patients in the intensive group vs. 35% of patients in the conventional group had at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia by the study end; the overall rates of severe hypoglycemia were 61.2 per 100 patient-years vs. 18.7 per 100 patient-years in the intensive and conventional treatment groups, respectively, with a relative risk (RR) of 3.28. The relative risk for coma and/or seizure was 3.02 for intensive therapy. The increased risk with intensive treatment persisted over each of the 9 years of follow-up in the DCCT and over the calendar years 1984-1993 during which the study was conducted. When baseline patient characteristics were examined for effects on the risk of severe hypoglycemia, the relative risk of hypoglycemia for intensive versus conventional treatment was > or = 2 for all subgroups. Several subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including males, adolescents, and subjects with no residual C-peptide or with a prior history of hypoglycemia, had a particularly high risk of severe hypoglycemia in both treatment groups. Analyses of the cumulative incidence of successive episodes indicated that intensive treatment was also associated with an increased risk of multiple episodes within the same patient (e.g., 22% experienced five or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia within the first 5 years of follow-up vs. 4% in the conventional group). Within both treatment groups, patients who experienced severe hypoglycemia were at increased risk of subsequent episodes. Approximately 30% of patients in each group experienced a second episode within the 4 months following the first episode of severe hypoglycemia. Within each treatment group, the number of prior episodes of hypoglycemia was the strongest predictor of the risk of future episodes, followed closely by the current HbA1c value. After adjustment for the current quarterly HbA1c level, intensive treatment was still associated with a significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia, indicating that the increased risk with intensive treatment is not completely explained by differences in HbA1c values.

Insulin lispro, an insulin analog recently developed particularly for mealtime therapy, has a fast absorption rate and a short duration of action. We compared insulin lispro and regular human insulin in the mealtime treatment of 1,008 patients with IDDM. The study was a 6-month randomized multinational (17 countries) and multicenter (102 investigators) clinical trial performed with an open-label crossover design. Insulin lispro was injected immediately before the meal, and regular human insulin was injected 30-45 min before the meal. Throughout the study, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was significantly lower during insulin lispro therapy. At the endpoint, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was reduced at 1 h by 1.3 mmol/l and at 2 h by 2.0 mmol/l in patients treated with insulin lispro (P < 0.001). The rate of hypoglycemia was 12% less with insulin lispro (6.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.3 episodes/30 days, P < 0.001), independent of basal insulin regimen or HbA1c level. The reduction was observed equally in episodes with and without symptoms. When the total number of episodes for each patient was analyzed according to the time of occurrence, the number of hypoglycemic episodes was less with insulin lispro than with regular human insulin therapy during three of four quarters of the day (P < 0.001). The largest relative improvement was observed at night. In conclusion, insulin lispro improves postprandial control, reduces hypoglycemic episodes, and improves patient convenience, compared with regular human insulin, in IDDM patients.

Insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] is a rapidly absorbed analog that has diminished tendency to self-associate. In four open-label, 1-year-long international randomized trials, we contrasted the immunogenicity of insulin lispro versus regular human insulin (RHI) in patients previously treated with insulin who had IDDM or NIDDM. Using a self-blank subtraction assay, we assessed sera for the presence of insulin-specific antibodies (ISA), insulin lispro-specific antibodies (LSA), and cross-reactive antibodies (CRA). Basal insulin needs were provided either with human ultralente (UL) or NPH insulins. After 2 to 4 weeks of therapy with RHI plus UL or RHI plus NPH, 50% of patients were randomly assigned to begin insulin lispro or continue on RHI. At baseline, few pretreated patients had LSA (0-4%) and approximately 10% had ISA, whereas 41-45% of patients with IDDM and 23-27% of patients with NIDDM had CRA (IDDM vs. NIDDM, P < 0.001). Within studies, no significant differences were noted over time in ISA, LSA, or CRA attributable to the type of short-acting insulin. When data were pooled, inconsistent changes were noted in ISA and LSA (LSA were greater in NIDDM vs. IDDM at baseline, P = 0.001, and ISA were greater in IDDM vs. NIDDM at 6 months, P = 0.007). Significant levels of CRA were more common in IDDM at all times (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, and P = 0.002 at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively). For patients receiving insulin lispro, no significant changes occurred in antibody status among IDDM and NIDDM patients throughout the study (became positive, remained positive, became negative, or remained negative). IDDM patients were more likely to develop or maintain CRA levels (P = 0.008 vs. NIDDM), whereas antibody levels were comparable among positive individuals. No evidence was noted that insulin lispro differs in immunogenicity from RHI in previously treated IDDM and NIDDM patients.

Nicotinamide is being used in trials to prevent or delay the development of clinical IDDM. A related compound, niacin, has been shown to cause insulin resistance in normal subjects, resulting in increased insulin secretion. This study was designed to answer the question: Does the short-term administration of nicotinamide cause insulin resistance in subjects who have a high risk of developing IDDM? Eight islet cell antibody-positive (ICA+) relatives of IDDM patients were given nicotinamide at a dose of 2 g/day for 2 weeks. Measurements of first-phase insulin release, insulin sensitivity, glucose effectiveness, and the constant for glucose disappearance (Kg) were measured at baseline, at the end of 2 weeks of therapy, and after subjects had been off therapy for at least 2 weeks. Nicotinamide administration caused a 23.6% decrease in insulin sensitivity (P = 0.02). This decrease was associated with a fall in Kg despite increased insulin secretion. Our data suggest that the use of nicotinamide in subjects who are at risk of developing IDDM may be complicated by the drug's effects on insulin sensitivity. By inducing insulin resistance, a therapeutic effect of nicotinamide on the diabetes disease process may be missed, and the interpretation of insulin secretion measurements that are obtained during the intervention trials using nicotinamide may be complicated by the changes in insulin secretion that are caused by the increased insulin resistance. Therefore, we strongly support the recommendation that at least one subgroup of subjects enrolled in clinical trials to prevent IDDM have regular measurements of both insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion performed. This subgroup should be randomly assigned and large enough for statistical analysis to interpret properly the changes in insulin secretion that may occur.

We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled study to determine the effects of the thiazolidinedione compound troglitazone on whole-body insulin sensitivity (SI), pancreatic beta-cell function, and glucose tolerance in 42 Latino women with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), characteristics that carry an 80% risk of developing NIDDM within 5 years. After baseline oral (OGTT) and intravenous (IVGTT) glucose tolerance testing, subjects were assigned to take placebo or 200 or 400 mg troglitazone daily for 12 weeks (14 subjects per treatment group). An OGTT and IVGTT were repeated during the 12th week of treatment. Five subjects failed to complete the trial for personal reasons, and medication compliance averaged 90% in the remaining subjects, none of whom experienced a serious adverse event. SI, calculated by minimal model analysis of IVGTT results, changed by only 4 +/- 14% during 12 weeks of placebo administration, but increased 40 +/- 22 and 88 +/- 22% above basal during treatment with 200 and 400 mg troglitazone, respectively (P = 0.01 among groups). Troglitazone administration was also associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the total insulin area during IVGTTs, which was highly significant (P < 0.001), and with a reduction during OGTTs, which approached statistical significance (P = 0.09). Glucose tolerance improved slightly in all groups, but the magnitude of change did not differ significantly among groups, whether it was assessed as the number of subjects who continued to manifest IGT at 12 weeks (P = 0.64 among groups), the change in total glucose area during OGTTs (P = 0.58), or the change in fractional glucose disappearance rates during IVGTTs (P = 0.28). Among the women who received troglitazone, the greatest improvement in SI occurred in the women who had the highest diastolic blood pressures and the best IVGTT insulin responses during baseline testing. Our findings indicate that troglitazone improved whole-body insulin sensitivity and lowered circulating insulin concentrations in women with prior GDM who are at very high risk for NIDDM. The lack of improvement in glucose tolerance despite improved insulin sensitivity may be a manifestation of the beta-cell defect that predisposes the women to NIDDM. The overall pattern of response to troglitazone in our high-risk patients indicates that the drug is an ideal agent with which to test whether the amelioration of insulin resistance can delay or prevent diabetes in women with limited beta-cell reserve.

Twenty islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive patients, aged 19-38 years, with IDDM were randomized at onset to treatment with either diazoxide, a K+ channel opener that inhibits the release of insulin, or placebo for 3 months, in addition to multiple insulin injection therapy. The patients who were given diazoxide displayed higher residual insulin secretion than the placebo group after 1 year (basal C-peptide level, 0.40 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.25 +/- 0.04 [mean +/- SE] nmol/l; P < 0.021) and at an 18-month follow-up (0.37 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.01 nmol/l, P < 0.033). Metabolic control did not differ between the two groups. During the course of the study, no differences in islet cell or GAD autoantibodies were detected between the two groups. The results of this study warrant further trials to explore the potential of inducing target cell rest in order to halt the loss of insulin-producing cells during the early course of the disease.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated a reduction in the development and progression of the long-term complications of IDDM with intensive therapy aimed at achieving glycemic control as close to the nondiabetic range as possible. The DCCT subsequently showed that the total lifetime exposure to glycemia was the principal determinant of the risk of retinopathy and that there was a continuous nonlinear relationship between this risk and the mean level of HbA1c (DCCT Research Group, Diabetes 44:968-993, 1995). In contrast, other authors, based on a retrospective study (Krolewski et al., N Engl J Med 332:1251-1255, 1995), have suggested that a glycemic threshold for microabuminuria and for retinopathy exists at an HbA1c level of approximately 8%, below which there is no further appreciable reduction in risk. In this perspective, we examine whether the DCCT data demonstrate such a glycemic threshold for the development of retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy. In the DCCT, 1,441 patients with IDDM were randomly assigned to intensive (n = 711) or conventional (n = 730) therapy and followed for a mean of 6.5 years. Retinopathy was assessed every 6 months by stereoscopic fundus photography; albumin excretion was measured annually in a 4-h collection; and neuropathy was assessed with a standardized protocol performed at baseline and at 5 years. Glycosylated hemoglobin was measured quarterly. Episodes of severe hypoglycemia were ascertained using standardized procedures. The risks (hazard rates) of retinopathy progression and of developing microalbuminuria and neuropathy were found to be continuous but nonlinear over the entire range of glycosylated hemoglobin values in the intensive, conventional, and combined treatment groups. These nonlinear relationships describe a constant relative risk gradient in which proportional reductions in HbA1c are accompanied by proportional reductions in the risk of complications. Although the magnitude of the absolute risk reduction declines with continuing proportional reductions in HbA1c, there are still meaningful further reductions in risk as the HbA1c is reduced toward the normal range. When the instantaneous risks for different complications associated with different HbA1c values are compounded over time, there are substantial differences in the cumulative incidence of patients experiencing a complication for patients with HbA1c values of 6 vs. 7 vs. 8% or higher. In fact, no HbA1c threshold could be identified, short of normal glycemia, below which there was no risk of the development or progression of these complications. Furthermore, as the HbA1c was reduced proportionately, the proportional rate of decline in the relative risk for each of these complications was similar for HbA1c levels < or = 8.0% and for levels > 8%. In contrast, although the absolute risk of severe hypoglycemia in the intensive treatment group increased as the HbA1c decreased, the relative risk gradients were significantly less for HbA1c levels < or = 8.0% than for levels > 8%. These extensive prospective DCCT data do not support the conjecture that a glycemic threshold for the development of complications exists at an HbA1c of 8% or that an HbA1c goal of 8% is maximally beneficial. In the DCCT, as HbA1c was reduced below 8% there were continuing relative reductions in the risk of complications, whereas there was a slower rate of increase in the risk of hypoglycemia. Therefore, the DCCT continues to recommend implementation of intensive therapy with the goal of achieving normal glycemia as early as possible in as many IDDM patients as is safely possible.

Microangiopathy is retarded by improved blood glucose control in patients with IDDM. Whether or not this is true for macroangiopathy (atherosclerosis) has remained unclear. A total of 59 patients (44 +/- 1.5 years, previous HbA1C 9.4 +/- 0.2%, mean +/- SE) with IDDM were investigated. Of the 59 patients, 31 had been randomized to long-term intensified conventional insulin treatment (ICT), and the remaining 28 had received standard insulin treatment (ST). Blood glucose control was significantly better in the ICT patients with an HbAlc value (mean of 29 values during 10 years) of 7.1 +/- 0.1% compared with the ST patients' 8.2 +/- 0.2% (P < 0.0001). With high-frequency ultrasound, endothelial function was measured as flow-mediated dilation of the right brachial artery. The carotid arteries were scanned for plaques, intima-media thickness was measured, and arterial wall stiffness was calculated in the right common carotid artery. These measurements correlate with manifest and/or risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. The patients in the ST group had stiffer arteries (P = 0.011) and thicker intima-media in the left common carotid artery (P = 0.009) than those in the ICT group. Patients with lower HbA1c generally had better endothelial function (P = 0.028) and less stiff arteries (P = 0.009). Better blood glucose control in patients with IDDM is related not only to less microangiopathy but also to a slower development of atherosclerosis.

To test the hypothesis that glycemic thresholds for hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction, like those for neuroendocrine responses to and symptoms of hypoglycemia, shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia, 16 healthy young adult subjects (7 women and 9 men) were studied on two separate occasions in random sequence, once with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, 47 +/- 1 mg/dl) and once with otherwise identical hyperinsulinemic euglycemia (4.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, 86 +/- 5 mg/dl) between 1430 and 1630. Neuroendocrine, symptomatic, and cognitive responses to hyperinsulinemic stepped hypoglycemic (4.7, 4.2, 3.6, 3.0, 2.8, 2.5, and 2.2 mmol/l; 85, 75, 65, 55, 50, 45, and 40 mg/dl) clamps were quantitated the following morning on both occasions. Cognitive function tests included measures of information processing (Serial Addition), attention (Stroop Arrow Word), pattern recognition and memory (Delayed Non-Match to Sample), and declarative memory (Paragraph Recall). As expected, plasma glucagon (P = 0.0094), epinephrine (P = 0.0063), and pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0046) responses to stepped hypoglycemia were reduced significantly, and symptomatic responses tended to be reduced after afternoon hypoglycemia. Performance on the cognitive function tests deteriorated (P < 0.0001) during stepped hypoglycemic clamps, but there were no significant overall effects of antecedent hypoglycemia on hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction. Although deterioration was reduced (P < 0.05) from the 2.8 mmol/l (50 mg/dl) to the 2.5 mmol/l (45 mg/dl) steps on the Serial Addition and Delayed Non-Match to Sample tasks after afternoon hypoglycemia, comparable differences were not found on the Stroop Arrow Word or Paragraph Recall tasks. Thus, glycemic thresholds for hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction, unlike those for neuroendocrine responses to and symptoms of hypoglycemia, do not seem to shift to substantially lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia in nondiabetic humans.

The rationale for intensive insulin therapy and results from major clinical trials in diabetes are reviewed. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) has shown that intensive insulin therapy will prevent or delay the onset of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in type I diabetes. The University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP) and the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) have addressed the issue of insulin versus oral agent or diet therapy in people with recently diagnosed type II diabetes. The UGDP showed that effective glycemic control could be achieved with intensive insulin therapy, but no effect on vascular end points was seen. Early data from the UKPDS also suggest that intensive insulin therapy may be more effective in lowering HbA1c toward normal than oral agents or diet. A pressing clinical problem is the question of the use of intensive insulin therapy in type II diabetic individuals who remain hyperglycemic despite pharmacological therapy. A Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study explored the feasibility of using intensive insulin therapy in 153 male type II diabetic patients with these characteristics. A 2% lowering of HbA1c was seen, with no increase in weight gain or in hypoglycemia. However, 40 of 153 patients (26.1%) had cardiovascular events during the 27-month trial; no difference in cardiovascular event rates was seen between the two treatment groups. A long-term multicenter collaborative trial is needed to assess the benefit:risk ratio of intensive insulin therapy for type II diabetic patients in whom pharmacological therapy failed to provide glycemic management.

To determine whether dietary modification improves insulin resistance and coronary atherosclerosis, we randomly assigned 14 Korean patients to an experimental group (low-fat, low-cholesterol diet, high polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratio, and calorie restriction) or to a control group (no dietary change). Coronary artery lesions were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography, and postglucose insulin responses were measured. At baseline, there were no significant differences in body weight, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and plasma lipid and insulin levels between the two groups. After completion of the 1-year diet program, the experimental group showed significant reductions in body weight (66.0 +/- 3.2 to 61.6 +/- 3.8 kg [means +/- SE], P < 0.01) and WHR (O.96 +/- 0.01 to 0.93 +/- 0.01, P < 0.05). Total cholesterol (5.45 +/- 0.45 to 4.50 +/- 0.44 mmol/l, P < 0.05), LDL cholesterol (3.71 +/- 0.36 to 2.98 +/- 0.37 mmol/l, P < 0.05), and triglyceride (1.91 +/- 0.28 to 1.29 +/- 0.17 mmol/l, P < 0.05) were also significantly reduced in the experimental group. The mean insulin response during an oral glucose tolerance test was also significantly decreased (258.6 +/- 26.4 to 181.8 +/- 6.6 pmol/l, P < 0.05). In contrast, there were no significant changes in these parameters in the control group. When only coronary artery lesions > 50% stenosed were analyzed, the average percentage diameter stenosis regressed from 63.2 to 56.8% in the experimental group. However, there were no significant changes in the control group. Our trial suggests that decreases in body weight and WHR and an improvement in insulin resistance with a low-fat, low cholesterol diet and caloric restriction may reduce risk factors and reverse coronary atherosclerotic lesions in 1 year.

Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha action has recently been shown to reverse insulin resistance dramatically and to improve glycemic control in obese rodents. This double-blind study was designed to assess the effects of a recombinant-engineered human TNF-alpha-neutralizing antibody (CDP571) on glucose homeostasis in obese NIDDM patients. Glycemic control and insulin sensitivity were monitored in 21 NIDDM subjects for a 2-week run-in and then for 6 weeks after treatment in a randomized fashion with a single intravenous dose of either CDP571 (5 mg/kg) or an equivalent volume of normal saline. The prolonged half-life of the antibody ensured adequate plasma levels as measured throughout the study. Concentrations of fasting glucose (CDP571: 10.0 +/- 0.8, 10.1 +/- 0.8, 10.0 +/- 1.0; placebo: 8.5 +/- 0.6, 8.1 +/- 0.5, 8.7 +/- 0.8 mmol/l at baseline, day 1, and week 4, respectively), fasting serum insulin (CDP571: 21.2 +/- 2.8, 21.0 +/- 2.8, 24.8 +/- 3.3; placebo: 19.0 +/- 2.8, 20.8 +/- 2.9, 17.5 +/- 2.2 pmol/l, respectively), and C-peptide remained unaffected by the type of treatment throughout the study. The percentage rate of glucose clearance per minute (KITT) during intravenous insulin sensitivity tests was identical in the CDP571 and placebo groups at baseline and also at 1 and 4 weeks after treatment (mean +/- SE; CDP571: 1.33 +/- 0.21, 1.44 +/- 0.25, 1.26 +/- 0.18; placebo: 1.38 +/- 0.15, 1.47 +/- 0.20, 1.52 +/- 0.20; P = 0.85, 0.93, and 0.36, respectively). TNF-alpha neutralization over a period of 4 weeks had no effect on insulin sensitivity in obese NIDDM subjects.

We compared the effects of oral vanadyl sulfate (100 mg/day) in moderately obese NIDDM and nondiabetic subjects. Three-hour euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic (insulin infusion 30 mU / m / min) clamps were performed after 2 weeks of placebo and 3 weeks of vanadyl sulfate treatment in six nondiabetic control subjects (age 37 +/- 3 years; BMI 29.5 +/- 2.4 kg/m2 ) and seven NIDDM subjects (age 53 +/- 2 years; BMI 28.7 +/-1.8 kg/m2). Glucose turnover ([3-3 H]glucose), glycolysis from plasma glucose, glycogen synthesis, and whole-body carbohydrate and lipid oxidation were evaluated. Decreases in fasting plasma glucose (by approximately 1.7 mmol/l) and HbAlc (both P < 0.05) were observed in NIDDM subjects during treatment; plasma glucose was unchanged in control subjects. In the latter, the glucose infusion rate (GIR) required to maintain euglycemia (40.1 +/- 5.7 and 38.1 +/- 4.8 micromol / kg fat-free mass FFM / min) and glucose disposal (Rd) (41.7 +/- 5.7 and 38.9 +/-4.7 micromol / kg FFM / min were similar during placebo and vanadyl sulfate administration, respectively. Hepatic glucose output (HGO) was completely suppressed in both studies. In contrast, in NIDDM subjects, vanadyl sulfate increased GIR approximately 82% (17.3 +/- 4.7 to 30.9 +/- 2.7 micromol / kg FFM / min, P < 0.05); this improvement in insulin sensitivity was due to both augmented stimulation of Rd (26.0 +/-4.0 vs. 33.6 +/- 2.22 micromol / kg FFM / min, P < 0.05) and enhanced suppression of HGO (7.7 +/- 3.1 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 micromol / kg FFM / min, P < 0.05). Increased insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis accounted for >80% of the increased Rd with vanadyl sulfate (P < 0.005), but plasma glucose flux via glycolysis was unchanged. In NIDDM subjects, vanadyl sulfate was also associated with greater suppression of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) (P < 0.01) and lipid oxidation (P < 0.05) during clamps. The reduction in HGO and increase in Rd were both highly correlated with the decline in plasma FFA concentrations during the clamp period (P < 0.001). In conclusion, small oral doses of vanadyl sulfate do not alter insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic subjects, but it does improve both hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects in part by enhancing insulin's inhibitory effect on lipolysis. These data suggest that vanadyl sulfate may improve a defect in insulin signaling specific to NIDDM.

It has been suggested that the hemodynamic derangements present in diabetic ketoacidosis are the results not only of profound volume depletion but also of the effects of increased production of vasodilating prostaglandins (PGs), principally PGI2, released by adipose tissue. In animal and in vitro models, prostaglandin synthesis is increased during insulin deficiency. We assessed the effects of short-term ketosis on the metabolic and hemodynamic variables of 10 IDDM patients free from long-term complications and of 9 normal control subjects after a 7-day randomized double-blind indomethacin (INDO) (50 mg q.i.d.) or placebo treatment period. Calf blood flow (CBF), postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH), and recovery half-time (an index of overall perfusion) after PORH were measured by plethysmography. Left ventricular and myocardial functions were also studied in each different condition during placebo and INDO treatment in IDDM patients. During placebo treatment, the increase in CBF during ketosis was higher (1.75 +/- 0.29 ml / min / 100 ml muscle) than during INDO (0.85 +/- 0.17 ml / min) / 100 ml muscle; P = 0.007). PORH was similar in baseline conditions, during ketosis, and in recovery in both the placebo and INDO arms. Recovery half-time significantly increased during placebo (10 +/- 2; 200%; P < 0.01) but not during INDO (1 +/- 1; 106%; NS) treatment. In normal control subjects, insulin deficiency did not induce any significant effect on hemodynamic variables. In IDDM patients, during placebo treatment, ketosis increased both the cardiac index (from 3.4 +/- 0.7 to 4.1 +/- 0.81 / min / m; P < 0.01) and the stroke index (from 42 +/- 8 to 49 +/- 7 ml/m2; P < 0.01) without changes in left ventricular ejection fraction but with a significant increase in both left and right ventricular end-diastolic volumes. Metabolic recovery induced a normalization of these parameters. INDO treatment significantly blunted these alterations. In summary, we showed that during acute insulin deficiency, INDO-sensitive mechanisms mediate vascular disturbances. Moreover, INDO treatment was capable of completely preventing the cardiac venous return and the left ventricular alterations. INDO does not interfere with the overall ketogenetic process or with insulin-induced metabolic recovery.

Although moderate weight loss improves glycemic control in obese NIDDM patients, quite often it is not normalized. To determine whether the response to weight loss can be improved by altering the macronutrient composition of hypocaloric diets, 17 obese NIDDM patients were studied at I) baseline, 2) after dieting for 6 weeks on a formula diet enriched in either monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs, n = 9) or carbohydrates (CHOs, n = 8) at a 50% caloric deficit, and 3) after 4 weeks of postdiet refeeding on the respective formulas with caloric intake titrated to achieve weight maintenance. Fasting, 24-h, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) blood glucose, plasma insulin, and C-peptide levels were measured. All prediet parameters were similar between groups. After dieting, although weight loss was similar between groups, the fasting glucose level decreased significantly more in the MUFA group (-4.6 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) than in the CHO group (-2.4 +/- 1.0 mmol/l; P < 0.05). Twenty-four-hour glycemia decreased in both groups after dieting, but the MUFA group had a greater decrease than the CHO group (P < 0.05, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Although decreases in fasting glycemia were maintained in both groups after refeeding, postprandial glycemia deteriorated after refeeding with the CHO- but not the MUFA-enriched formula (P < 0.05). After dieting and refeeding, fasting C-peptide increased 204 +/- 47 pmol/l in the MUFA group, but the CHO group remained at prediet levels (P < 0.05). Twenty-four-hour C-peptide levels were similar between groups after dieting and refeeding, despite the lower glycemia and CHO content of the MUFA formula. However, when equal amounts of CHO were consumed during the OGTT, the MUFA group had significantly higher C-peptide levels after both dieting and refeeding (P < 0.05). Fasting, 24-h, and OGTT insulin levels were similar between groups throughout the study. These results indicate that macronutrient composition is an important determinant of the glycemic response to weight-loss therapy in obese NIDDM patients. Based on the C-peptide response during the OGTT, increased CHO-induced insulin secretion is one possible mechanism by which this occurs.

Contrasting information has been reported concerning the course of renal function in NIDDM with hypertension alone or in association with renal damage. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the course of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hypertensive NIDDM patients during antihypertensive therapy. Furthermore, we compared the effects of ACE inhibitors (cilazapril, Inibace, Roche, Milan, Italy) and Ca(2+)-channel blockers (amlodipine, Norvasc, Pfizer, Rome, Italy). Of the hypertensive NIDDM patients attending the outpatient's clinic of the internal medicine departments of the University of Padova and Sassari, 44 participated in the present study. Of these patients, 26 were normoalbuminuric and 18 microalbuminuric. They were randomly treated with either cilazapril or amlodipine. The target of antihypertensive treatment was a value < 140 mmHg for systolic and 85 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (BP). Microalbuminuria was defined as an albumin excretion rate (AER) between 20 and 200 micrograms/min. GFR was measured by plasma clearance of 51Cr-labeled EDTA at baseline and every 6-12 months during a 3-year follow-up interval. A significant decrease was observed in the values of GFR, AER, and systolic and diastolic BP in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients during antihypertensive therapy. The GFR fall in the overall population of NIDDM patients was significantly and inversely related to the decrease of mean BP (diastolic + 1/3 pulse pressure) (r = -0.80, P < 0.0001) but not to that of HbA1c, triglycerides, and BMI. The GFR decline (mean +/- SE) per year in the normoalbuminuric patient was 2.03 +/- 0.66 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.92-3.17) during cilazapril and 2.01 +/- 0.71 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.82-3.11) during amlodipine therapy. The GFR decline per year in the microalbuminuric patient was 2.15 +/- 0.69 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.86-3.89) during cilazapril and 2.33 +/- 0.83 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 per year (95% CI 1.03-3.67) during amlodipine therapy. Cilazapril and amlodipine lowered AER to a similar extent in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients. No significant changes were observed concerning other clinical and biochemical features between the two antihypertensive therapies and particularly HbA1c, BMI, triglycerides, and cholesterol plasma values. These results support the tenet that arterial hypertension plays a pivotal role in contributing to renal damage in NIDDM, even when AER is normal. However, the degree of BP control, with both cilazapril and amlodipine, can successfully delay the slope of GFR decline in hypertensive NIDDM patients with or without incipient nephropathy.

In juvenile IDDM patients, immunosuppression with cyclosporin A allows partial beta-cell function recovery and transient remissions of insulin dependency. The effects of this therapeutic approach, however, have not been evaluated in the long-term, since no reported trial exceeded 1 year. Here we analyze 130 diabetic children followed at our institution during the first years of their disease. Cyclosporin was given to 83 of them at an initial dose of 7.2 +/- 0.1 mg.kg-1.day-1, which was decreased stepwise then interrupted after 6-62 months, depending on the response to therapy. A total of 47 diabetic children, who served as control subjects in two trials, were pooled for comparison. Over 4 years, the cyclosporin-treated group kept plasma C-peptide approximately twice as high as the control group (P < 0.02). It took 5.8 +/- 0.6 years for C-peptide secretion stimulated by glucagon to become undetectable in the cyclosporin group versus 3.2 +/- 0.6 years in the control group (P < 0.02). Average insulin dose remained lower by 0.2-0.4 U.kg-1.day-1 and glycated hemoglobin by approximately 1% in cyclosporin-treated patients (P < 0.02), who also had less hypoglycemia than the diabetic control subjects (P < 0.05). After 4 years, differences between the groups became nonsignificant. We observed no significant secondary effects of cyclosporin. In conclusion, positive effects of low-dose cyclosporin in recently diagnosed clinical IDDM patients are prolonged beyond interruption of the drug. The magnitude and duration of the benefit, however, do not appear sufficient to justify this immunosuppressive treatment in clinical practice.