Current nomenclature for the atrioventricular (AV) junctions derives from a surgically distorted view, placing the valvar rings and the triangle of Koch in a single plane with antero-posterior and right-left lateral coordinates. Within this convention, the aorta is considered to occupy an anterior position, although the mouth of the coronary sinus is shown as being posterior. Although this nomenclature has served its purpose for the description and treatment of arrhythmias dependent on accessory pathways and atrioventricular nodal reentry, it is less than satisfactory for the description of atrial and ventricular mapping. To correct these deficiencies, a consensus document has been prepared by experts from the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. It proposes a new anatomically sound nomenclature that will be applicable to all chambers of the heart. In this report, we discuss its value for description of the AV junctions, establishing the principles of this new nomenclature.

Ischemic preconditioning, a powerful form of endogenous protection against myocardial infarction, has been demonstrated in several animal species and, recently, in isolated human cardiomyocytes. For both logistic and ethical reasons, no clinical study can meet the strict conditions of experimental studies on preconditioning with infarct size as the end-point. Nevertheless, the demonstration of adaptation to ischemia observed during in vitro studies on human atrial trabeculae, in patients in the setting of coronary bypass surgery, and in the setting of coronary angioplasty in the absence of collateral vessel recruitment strongly suggests that ischemic preconditioning occurs in humans. This notion is further supported by the observation that in these human models, the adaptation to ischemia is influenced by drugs acting on K(ATP) channels and on purinergic and alpha-adrenergic receptors, similar to what is observed in accepted experimental models of ischemic preconditioning. This important form of myocardial endogenous protection may also play a role in the warm-up phenomenon and in mediating the beneficial effects of preinfarction angina. The demonstration of ischemic preconditioning in humans and the identification of some of its mediators suggests that in patients at high risk for myocardial infarction, drugs known to block this endogenous form of protection should be used with caution, whereas drugs known to elicit preconditioning might have a relevant therapeutic role.

Although definitive proof of a causal role of infection contributing to atherogenesis is lacking, multiple investigations have demonstrated that infectious agents evoke cellular and molecular changes supportive of such a role. Moreover, both Chlamydia pneumoniae and cytomegalovirus exacerbate lesion development in animal models of atherosclerosis and restenosis. The fact that multiple pathogens have been associated with atherosclerosis implies that many "atherogenic" pathogens exist, and recent data suggest that the risk of atherosclerosis conveyed by infection relates to the number of atherogenic pathogens with which an individual is infected. It also is evident that variability in host susceptibility to the atherogenic effects of pathogens exists; this variability appears to be related at least in part to whether the host can generate an immune response that successfully controls pathogen inflammatory activity and in part to the specific pattern of immune response--humoral or cellular. The latter may relate to host capacity to control pathogen activity and to a pathogen-induced autoimmune component of the atherogenic process. Additional animal and human studies are necessary to further test the validity of the infection/atherosclerosis link and to provide more insight into the mechanisms by which infection may contribute to atherosclerosis, information critical for devising strategies to reduce or eliminate any contribution to atherosclerosis caused by infection.

During the last decade, intensive efforts have been made to evaluate the role of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa complex in platelet-mediated thrombus formation. Significant efforts have also been made to design potent antagonists of this "final common pathway" of platelet aggregation to be used as novel therapeutic strategies to treat acute coronary syndromes. Although several different GP IIb/IIIa antagonists have convincingly demonstrated the usefulness of this platelet-directed therapeutic strategy, a number of lingering unsolved and sometimes misunderstood issues concerning the pharmacology and optimal clinical usefulness of these agents remain to be explored. This article reviews these issues, which include antagonist affinity, reversibility, and receptor specificity. Other issues are related to the effects of GP IIb/IIIa receptor availability, neoepitopes induced by antagonist binding with the potential to mediate thrombocytopenia, optimal methods of platelet monitoring and, perhaps ultimately, the potential therapeutic index of the oral class of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. All of these specific issues are likely to be illuminated in the next several years, which will greatly determine the breadth of this therapeutic class.

Circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) may constitute an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. How CRP as a risk factor is involved in cardiovascular disease is still unclear.

We assessed in meta-analyses the effect of the Gly188Glu, Asp9Asn, Asn291Ser, and Ser447Ter substitutions in lipoprotein lipase in the heterozygous state on lipid metabolism and risk of ischemic heart disease (same order used below).