Type 2 diabetic subjects failing glyburide therapy were randomized to receive additional therapy with either metformin (2,550 mg/day) or troglitazone (600 mg/day) for 3-4 months. Biopsies of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were obtained before and after therapy. Glycemic control was similar with both treatments. Metformin treatment increased insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal rates by 20% (P < 0.05); the response to troglitazone was greater (44% increase, P < 0.01 vs. baseline, P < 0.05 vs. metformin). Troglitazone-treated subjects displayed a tendency toward weight gain (5 +/- 2 kg, P < 0.05), increased adipocyte size, and increased serum leptin levels. Metformin-treated subjects were weight-stable, with unchanged leptin levels and reduced adipocyte size (to 84 +/- 4% of control, P < 0.005). Glucose transport in isolated adipocytes from metformin-treated subjects was unaltered from pretreatment. Glucose transport in both the absence (321 +/- 134% of pre-Rx, P < 0.05) and presence of insulin (418 +/- 161%, P < 0.05) was elevated after troglitazone treatment. Metformin treatment had no effect on adipocyte content of GLUT1 or GLUT4 proteins. After troglitazone treatment, GLUT4 protein expression was increased twofold (202 +/- 42%, P < 0.05). Insulin-stimulated serine phosphorylation of Akt was augmented after troglitazone (170 +/- 34% of pre-Rx response, P < 0.05) treatment and unchanged by metformin. We conclude that the ability of troglitazone to upregulate adipocyte glucose transport, GLUT4 expression, and insulin signaling can contribute to its greater effect on whole-body glucose disposal.

The metabolism of nitric oxide (NO) during cardiac surgery is unclear. We studied the effect of diabetes on NO metabolism during cardiac surgery in 40 subjects (20 with diabetes and 20 without diabetes). The patients were randomized to receive an infusion of physiological saline or nitroglycerin (GTN) at 1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) starting 10 min before the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and then continuing for a period of 4 h. Blood and urine samples were collected at several time points for up to 8 h. NO metabolites were determined by the measurement of nitrate/nitrite (NOx, micromol/mmol creatinine) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP, nmol/mmol creatinine) in plasma and urine. Plasma insulin levels were also determined at selected time points. Plasma NOx levels before surgery were significantly elevated in the group with diabetes compared with the group without diabetes (P < 0.001), and values were further increased during surgery in the former (P = 0.005) but not in the latter (P = 0.8). The greater plasma NOx values in patients with diabetes were matched by commensurate elevations in plasma cGMP levels (P = 0.01). Interestingly, infusion of GTN, an NO donor, significantly reduced plasma NOx (P < 0.001) and its urine elimination (P < 0.001) in patients with diabetes without reducing plasma cGMP levels (P = 0.89). Cardiac surgery increased plasma insulin in patients with and without diabetes; this increase was delayed by the infusion of GTN, but it was not related to the changes in NO production. In conclusion, NO production during cardiac surgery is increased in patients with diabetes, and this elevation can be blunted by the infusion of GTN in a rapid and reversible manner.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effect of caffeine (an adenosine receptor antagonist) on whole-body insulin-mediated glucose disposal in resting humans. We hypothesized that glucose disposal would be lower after the administration of caffeine compared with placebo. Healthy, lean, sedentary (n = 9) men underwent two trial sessions, one after caffeine administration (5 mg/kg body wt) and one after placebo administration (dextrose) in a double-blind randomized design. Glucose disposal was assessed using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Before the clamp, there were no differences in circulating levels of methylxanthines, catecholamines, or glucose. Euglycemia was maintained throughout the clamp with no difference in plasma glucose concentrations between trials. The insulin concentrations were also similar in the caffeine and placebo trials. After caffeine administration, glucose disposal was 6.38 +/- 0.76 mg/kg body wt compared with 8.42 +/- 0.63 mg/kg body wt after the placebo trial. This represents a significant (P < 0.05) decrease (24%) in glucose disposal after caffeine ingestion. In addition, carbohydrate storage was 35% lower (P < 0.05) in the caffeine trial than in the placebo trial. Furthermore, even when the difference in glucose disposal was normalized between the trials, there was a 23% difference in the amount of carbohydrate stored after caffeine administration compared with placebo administration. Caffeine ingestion also resulted in higher plasma epinephrine levels than placebo ingestion (P < 0.05). These data support our hypothesis that caffeine ingestion decreases glucose disposal and suggests that adenosine plays a role in regulating glucose disposal in resting humans.

We examined the effects of acute moderate hypoglycemia and the condition of hypoglycemia unawareness on regional brain uptake of the labeled glucose analog [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) using positron emission tomography (PET). FDG-PET was performed in diabetic patients with (n = 6) and without (n = 7) hypoglycemia awareness. Each patient was studied at plasma glucose levels of 5 and 2.6 mmol/l, applied by glucose clamp techniques, in random order. Hypoglycemia-unaware patients were asymptomatic during hypoglycemia, with marked attenuation of their epinephrine responses (mean [+/- SD] peak of 0.77 +/- 0.39 vs. 7.52 +/- 2.9 nmol/l; P < 0.0003) and a reduced global brain FDG uptake ([mean +/- SE] 2.592 +/- 0.188 vs. 2.018 +/- 0.174 at euglycemia; P = 0.027). Using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to analyze images of FDG uptake, we identified a subthalamic brain region that exhibited significantly different behavior between the aware and unaware groups. In the aware group, there was little change in the normalized FDG uptake in this region in response to hypoglycemia ([mean +/- SE] 0.654 +/- 0.016 to 0.636 +/- 0.013; NS); however, in the unaware group, the uptake in this region fell from 0.715 +/- 0.015 to 0.623 +/- 0.012 (P = 0.001). Our data were consistent with the human hypoglycemia sensor being anatomically located in this brain region, and demonstrated for the first time a change in its metabolic function associated with the failure to trigger a counter-regulatory response.

The frequent occurrence of hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes is attributed to abnormalities in the blood glucose counterregulatory response. In view of recent findings indicating that the kidney contributes to prevent and correct hypoglycemia in healthy subjects, we decided to investigate the role of renal glucose handling in hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Twelve type 1 diabetic patients and 14 age-matched normal individuals were randomized to hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic (n = 6 diabetic subjects and n = 8 control subjects) or hypoglycemic (n = 6 each) clamps with blood glucose maintained either stable near 100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/l) or reduced to 54 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/l). All study subjects had their renal vein catheterized under fluoroscopy, and net renal glucose balance and renal glucose production and utilization rates were measured using a combination of arteriovenous concentration difference with stable isotope dilution technique. Blood glucose and insulin were comparable in both groups in all studies. In patients with diabetes, elevations in plasma glucagon, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were blunted, and both the compensatory rise in endogenous glucose production and in the net glucose output by the kidney seen in normal subjects with equivalent hypoglycemia were absent. Renal glucose balance switched from a mean +/- SE baseline net uptake of 0.6 +/- 0.4 to a net output of 4.5 +/- 1.3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) in normal subjects, but in patients with diabetes there was no net renal contribution to blood glucose during similar hypoglycemia (mean +/- SE net glucose uptake [baseline 0.7 +/- 0.4] remained at 0.4 +/- 0.3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) in the final 40 min of hypoglycemia; P < 0.01 between groups). We conclude that adrenergic stimulation of glucose output by the kidney, which represents an additional defense mechanism against hypoglycemia in normal subjects, is impaired in patients with type 1 diabetes and contributes to defective glucose counterregulation.

The high-frequency oscillatory pattern of insulin release is disturbed in type 2 diabetes. Although sulfonylurea drugs are widely used for the treatment of this disease, their effect on insulin release patterns is not well established. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of acute treatment and 5 weeks of sulfonylurea (gliclazide) treatment on insulin secretory dynamics in type 2 diabetic patients. To this end, 10 patients with type 2 diabetes (age 53 +/- 2 years, BMI 27.5 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2), fasting plasma glucose 9.8 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, HbA(1c) 7.5 +/- 0.3%) were studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective crossover design. Patients received 40-80 mg gliclazide/placebo twice daily for 5 weeks with a 6-week washout period intervening. Insulin pulsatility was assessed by 1-min interval blood sampling for 75 min 1) under baseline conditions (baseline), 2) 3 h after the first dose (80 mg) of gliclazide (acute) with the plasma glucose concentration clamped at the baseline value, 3) after 5 weeks of treatment (5 weeks), and 4) after 5 weeks of treatment with the plasma glucose concentration clamped during the sampling at the value of the baseline assessment (5 weeks-elevated). Serum insulin concentration time series were analyzed by deconvolution, approximate entropy (ApEn), and spectral and autocorrelation methods to quantitate pulsatility and regularity. The P values given are gliclazide versus placebo; results are means +/- SE. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced after gliclazide treatment (baseline vs. 5 weeks: gliclazide, 10.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l; placebo, 10.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 11.0 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, P = 0.001). Insulin secretory burst mass was increased (baseline vs. acute: gliclazide, 43.0 +/- 12.0 vs. 61.0 +/- 17.0 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1); placebo, 36.1 +/- 8.4 vs. 30.3 +/- 7.4 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P = 0.047; 5 weeks-elevated: gliclazide vs. placebo, 49.7 +/- 13.3 vs. 37.1 +/- 9.5 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P < 0.05) with a similar rise in burst amplitude. Basal (i.e., nonoscillatory) insulin secretion also increased (baseline vs. acute: gliclazide, 8.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 16.7 +/- 4.3 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1); placebo, 5.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.9 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P = 0.03; 5 weeks-elevated: gliclazide vs. placebo, 12.2 +/- 2.5 vs. 9.4 +/- 2.1 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P = 0.016). The frequency and regularity of insulin pulses were not modified significantly by the antidiabetic therapy. There was, however, a correlation between individual values for the acute improvement of regularity, as measured by ApEn, and the decrease in fasting plasma glucose during short-term (5-week) gliclazide treatment (r = 0.74, P = 0.014, and r = 0.77, P = 0.009, for fine and coarse ApEn, respectively). In conclusion, the sulfonylurea agent gliclazide augments insulin secretion by concurrently increasing pulse mass and basal insulin secretion without changing secretory burst frequency or regularity. The data suggest a possible relationship between the improvement in short-term glycemic control and the acute improvement of regularity of the in vivo insulin release process.

In the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, ACE inhibitor therapy reduces albumin excretion and slows the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Our study was designed to investigate whether these effects lay in amelioration of the underlying glomerular structural abnormalities. A total of 54 type 1 diabetic patients with albuminuria and blood pressure (BP) <150/90 mmHg were randomized to receive 10 mg enalapril once daily, 10 mg nifedipine retard twice daily, or placebo in a multicenter double-blind study of 3 years' duration. Renal biopsy was performed at baseline and follow-up, and tissue was analyzed by standard morphometric methods. BP, GFR, albumin excretion rate (AER), and HbA1c were measured every 6 months. Enalapril lowered AER after 6 months by 26% (P < 0.05); however, this reduction was not sustained at 3 years. There was no significant effect of nifedipine or placebo on AER. GFR decreased by a similar average rate of 4.1 ml x min(-1) x year(-1) (95% CI 2.6-5.6) in all three groups. BP and HbA1c were unchanged throughout the study in all groups. At baseline, nearly all biopsies showed classic appearances of diabetic glomerulopathy. There was no detectable effect of enalapril compared with either nifedipine or placebo on renal structure over 3 years. However, we found that patients with increased AER have established glomerulopathy and a progressive average decline in GFR of 4.1 ml x min(-1) x year(-1) in the absence of overt hypertension, and baseline AER appeared predictive of subsequent mesangial volume fraction (r = 0.20, P = 0.0018). In this small cohort of nonhypertensive patients studied for 3 years, disease evolution appears unaffected by treatment with either enalapril or nifedipine.

The insulinotropic gut hormone glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 increases secretory burst mass and the amplitude of pulsatile insulin secretion in healthy volunteers without affecting burst frequency. Effects of GLP-1 on secretory mechanisms in type 2 diabetic patients and subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) known to have impaired pulsatile release of insulin have not yet been studied. Eight type 2 diabetic patients (64+/-9 years, BMI 28.9+/-7.2 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.7+/-1.3%) and eight subjects with IGT (63+/-10 years, BMI 31.7+/-6.4 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.7+/-0.4) were studied on separate occasions in the fasting state during the continued administration of exogenous GLP-1 (1.2 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), started at 10:00 P.M. the evening before) or placebo. For comparison, eight healthy volunteers (62+/-7 years, BMI 27.7+/-4.8 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.4+/-0.5) were studied only with placebo. Blood was sampled continuously over 60 min (roller-pump) in 1-min fractions for the measurement of plasma glucose and insulin. Pulsatile insulin secretion was characterized by deconvolution, autocorrelation, and spectral analysis and by estimating the degree of randomness (approximate entropy). In type 2 diabetic patients, exogenous GLP-1 at approximately 90 pmol/l improved plasma glucose concentrations (6.4+/-2.1 mmol/l vs. placebo 9.8+/-4.1 mmol/l, P = 0.0005) and significantly increased mean insulin burst mass (by 68%, P = 0.007) and amplitude (by 59%, P = 0.006; deconvolution analysis). In IGT subjects, burst mass was increased by 45% (P = 0.019) and amplitude by 38% (P = 0.02). By deconvolution analysis, insulin secretory burst frequency was not affected by GLP-1 in either type 2 diabetic patients (P = 0.15) or IGT subjects (P = 0.76). However, by both autocorrelation and spectral analysis, GLP-1 prolonged the period (lag time) between subsequent maxima of insulin concentrations significantly from approximately 9 to approximately 13 min in both type 2 diabetic patients and IGT subjects. Under placebo conditions, parameters of pulsatile insulin secretion were similar in normal subjects, type 2 diabetic patients, and IGT subjects based on all methodological approaches (P > 0.05). In conclusion, intravenous GLP-1 reduces plasma glucose in type 2 diabetic patients and improves the oscillatory secretion pattern by amplifying insulin secretory burst mass, whereas the oscillatory period determined by autocorrelation and spectral analysis is significantly prolonged. This was not the case for the interpulse interval determined by deconvolution. Together, these results suggest a normalization of the pulsatile pattern of insulin secretion by GLP-1, which supports the future therapeutic use of GLP-1-derived agents.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of oral creatine supplementation on muscle GLUT4 protein content and total creatine and glycogen content during muscle disuse and subsequent training. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial was performed with 22 young healthy volunteers. The right leg of each subject was immobilized using a cast for 2 weeks, after which subjects participated in a 10-week heavy resistance training program involving the knee-extensor muscles (three sessions per week). Half of the subjects received creatine monohydrate supplements (20 g daily during the immobilization period and 15 and 5 g daily during the first 3 and the last 7 weeks of rehabilitation training, respectively), whereas the other 11 subjects ingested placebo (maltodextrine). Muscle GLUT4 protein content and glycogen and total creatine concentrations were assayed in needle biopsy samples from the vastus lateralis muscle before and after immobilization and after 3 and 10 weeks of training. Immobilization decreased GLUT4 in the placebo group (-20%, P < 0.05), but not in the creatine group (+9% NS). Glycogen and total creatine were unchanged in both groups during the immobilization period. In the placebo group, during training, GLUT4 was normalized, and glycogen and total creatine were stable. Conversely, in the creatine group, GLUT4 increased by approximately 40% (P < 0.05) during rehabilitation. Muscle glycogen and total creatine levels were higher in the creatine group after 3 weeks of rehabilitation (P < 0.05), but not after 10 weeks of rehabilitation. We concluded that 1) oral creatine supplementation offsets the decline in muscle GLUT4 protein content that occurs during immobilization, and 2) oral creatine supplementation increases GLUT4 protein content during subsequent rehabilitation training in healthy subjects.

To compare the pharmacokinetics/dynamics of the long-acting insulin analog glargine with NPH, ultralente, and continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of insulin lispro (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]), 20 C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic patients were studied on four occasions during an isoglycemic 24-h clamp. Patients received SC injection of either 0.3 U/kg glargine or NPH insulin (random sequence, crossover design). On two subsequent occasions, they received either an SC injection of ultralente (0.3 U/kg) or CSII (0.3 U x kg(-1) x 24 h(-1)) (random sequence, crossover design). After SC insulin injection or CSII, intravenous (IV) insulin was tapered, and glucose was infused to clamp plasma glucose at 130 mg/dl for 24 h. Onset of action (defined as reduction of IV insulin >50%) was earlier with NPH (0.8 +/- 0.2 h), CSII (0.5 +/- 0.1 h), and ultralente (1 +/- 0.2 h) versus glargine (1.5 +/- 0.3 h) (P < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). End of action (defined as an increase in plasma glucose >150 mg/dl) occurred later with glargine (22 +/- 4 h) than with NPH (14 +/- 3 h) (P < 0.05) but was similar with ultralente (20 +/- 6 h). NPH and ultralente exhibited a peak concentration and action (at 4.5 +/- 0.5 and 10.1 +/- 1 h, respectively) followed by waning, whereas glargine had no peak but had a flat concentration/action profile mimicking CSII. Interindividual variability (calculated as differences in SD of plasma insulin concentrations and glucose infusion rates in different treatments) was lower with glargine than with NPH and ultralente (P < 0.05) but was similar with glargine and CSII (NS). In conclusion, NPH and ultralente are both peak insulins. Duration of action of ultralente is greater, but intersubject variability is also greater than that of NPH. Glargine is a peakless insulin, it lasts nearly 24 h, it has lower intersubject variability than NPH and ultralente, and it closely mimics CSII, the gold standard of basal insulin replacement.

Type 1 diabetes is considered to be a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease in which insulin-producing beta-cells are destroyed. Immunity to insulin has been suggested to be one of the primary autoimmune mechanisms leading to islet cell destruction. We have previously shown that the first immunization to insulin occurs by exposure to bovine insulin (BI) in cow's milk (CM) formula. In this study, we analyzed the development of insulin-specific T-cell responses by proliferation test, emergence of insulin-binding antibodies by enzyme immunoassay, and insulin autoantibodies by radioimmunoassay in relation to CM exposure and family history of type 1 diabetes in infants with a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes and increased genetic risk for the disease. The infants were randomized to receive either an adapted CM-based formula or a hydrolyzed casein (HC)-based formula after breast-feeding for the first 6-8 months of life. At the age of 3 months, both cellular and humoral responses to BI were higher in infants exposed to CM formula than in infants fully breast-fed (P = 0.015 and P = 0.007). IgG antibodies to BI were higher in infants who received CM formula than in infants who received HC formula at 3 months of age (P = 0.01), but no difference in T-cell responses was seen between the groups. T-cell responses to BI at 9 months of age (P = 0.05) and to human insulin at 12 (P = 0.014) and 24 months of age (P = 0.009) as well as IgG antibodies to BI at 24 months of age (P = 0.05) were lower in children with a diabetic mother than in children with a diabetic father or a sibling, suggesting possible tolerization to insulin by maternal insulin therapy. The priming of insulin-specific humoral and T-cell immunity occurs in early infancy by dietary insulin, and this phenomenon is influenced by maternal type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is associated with abnormalities of the growth hormone (GH)-IGF-I axis. Such abnormalities include decreased circulating levels of IGF-I. We studied the effects of IGF-I therapy (40 microg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) on protein and glucose metabolism in adults with type 1 diabetes in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. A total of 12 subjects participated, and each subject was studied at baseline and after 7 days of treatment, both in the fasting state and during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic amino acid clamp. Protein and glucose metabolism were assessed using infusions of [1-13C]leucine and [6-6-2H2]glucose. IGF-I administration resulted in a 51% rise in circulating IGF-I levels (P < 0.005) and a 56% decrease in the mean overnight GH concentration (P < 0.05). After IGF-I treatment, a decrease in the overnight insulin requirement (0.26+/-0.07 vs. 0.17+/-0.06 U/kg, P < 0.05) and an increase in the glucose infusion requirement were observed during the hyperinsulinemic clamp (approximately 67%, P < 0.05). Basal glucose kinetics were unchanged, but an increase in insulin-stimulated peripheral glucose disposal was observed after IGF-I therapy (37+/-6 vs. 52+/-10 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.05). IGF-I administration increased the basal metabolic clearance rate for leucine (approximately 28%, P < 0.05) and resulted in a net increase in leucine balance, both in the basal state and during the hyperinsulinemic amino acid clamp (-0.17+/-0.03 vs. -0.10+/-0.02, P < 0.01, and 0.25+/-0.08 vs. 0.40+/-0.06, P < 0.05, respectively). No changes in these variables were recorded in the subjects after administration of placebo. These findings demonstrated that IGF-I replacement resulted in significant alterations in glucose and protein metabolism in the basal and insulin-stimulated states. These effects were associated with increased insulin sensitivity, and they underline the major role of IGF-I in protein and glucose metabolism in type 1 diabetes.

The purpose of this study was to examine the response of pancreatic beta-cells to changes in insulin sensitivity in women at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGTs) were conducted on Latino women with impaired glucose tolerance and a history of gestational diabetes before and after 12 weeks of treatment with 400 mg/day troglitazone (n = 13) or placebo (n = 12). Insulin sensitivity was assessed by minimal model analysis, and beta-cell insulin release was assessed as acute insulin responses to glucose (AIRg) and tolbutamide (AIRt) during FSIGTs and as the 30-min incremental insulin response (30-min dINS) during OGTTs. Beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance was assessed as the product (disposition index) of minimal model insulin sensitivity and each of the 3 measures of beta-cell insulin release. In the placebo group, there was no significant change in insulin sensitivity or in any measure of insulin release, beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance, or glucose tolerance. Troglitazone treatment resulted in a significant increase in insulin sensitivity, as reported previously. In response, AIRg did not change significantly, so that the disposition index for AIRg increased significantly from baseline (P = 0.004) and compared with placebo (P = 0.02). AIRt (P = 0.001) and 30-min dINS (P = 0.02) fell with improved insulin sensitivity during troglitazone treatment, so that the disposition index for each of these measures of beta-cell function did not change significantly from baseline (P > 0.20) or compared with placebo (P > 0.3). Minimal model analysis revealed that 89% of the change from baseline in insulin sensitivity during troglitazone treatment was accounted for by lowered plasma insulin concentrations. Neither oral nor intravenous glucose tolerance changed significantly from baseline or compared with placebo during troglitazone treatment. The predominant response of beta-cells to improved insulin sensitivity in women at high risk for type 2 diabetes was a reduction in insulin release to maintain nearly constant glucose tolerance.

To detect and understand the changes in beta-cell function in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, an accurate and precise estimation of prehepatic insulin secretion rate (ISR) is essential. There are two common methods to assess ISR, the deconvolution method (by Eaton and Polonsky)-considered the "gold standard"-and the combined model (by Vølund et al.). The deconvolution method is a 2-day method, which generally requires separate assessment of C-peptide kinetics, whereas the combined model is a single-day method that uses insulin and C-peptide data from a single test of interest. The validity of these mathematical techniques for quantification of insulin secretion have been tested in dogs, but not in humans. In the present studies, we examined the validity of both methods to recover the known infusion rates of insulin and C-peptide mimicking ISR during an oral glucose tolerance test. ISR from both the combined model and the deconvolution method were accurate, i.e., recovery of true ISR was not significantly different from 100%. Furthermore, both maximal and total ISRs from the combined model were strongly correlated to those obtained by the deconvolution method (r = 0.89 and r = 0.82, respectively). These results indicate that both approaches provide accurate assessment of prehepatic ISRs in type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects. A simplified version of the deconvolution method based on standard kinetic parameters for C-peptide (Van Cauter et al.) was compared with the 2-day deconvolution method, and a close agreement was found for the results of an oral glucose tolerance test. We also studied whether C-peptide kinetics are influenced by somatostatin infusion. The decay curves after bolus injection of exogenous biosynthetic human C-peptide, the kinetic parameters, and the metabolic clearance rate were similar whether measured during constant peripheral somatostatin infusion or without somatostatin infusion. Assessment of C-peptide kinetics can be performed without infusion of somatostatin, because the endogenous insulin concentration remains constant. Assessment of C-peptide kinetics with and without infusion of somatostatin results in nearly identical secretion rates for insulin during an oral glucose tolerance test.

Glucose toxicity (i.e., glucose-induced reduction in insulin secretion and action) may be mediated by an increased flux through the hexosamine-phosphate pathway. Glucosamine (GlcN) is widely used to accelerate the hexosamine pathway flux, independently of glucose. We tested the hypothesis that GlcN can affect insulin secretion and/or action in humans. In 10 healthy subjects, we sequentially performed an intravenous glucose (plus [2-3H]glucose) tolerance test (IVGTT) and a euglycemic insulin clamp during either a saline infusion or a low (1.6 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1)) or high (5 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1) [n = 5]) GlcN infusion. Beta-cell secretion, insulin (SI*-IVGTT), and glucose (SG*) action on glucose utilization during the IVGTT were measured according to minimal models of insulin secretion and action. Infusion of GlcN did not affect readily releasable insulin levels, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), or the time constant of secretion, but it increased both the glucose threshold of GSIS (delta approximately 0.5-0.8 mmol/l, P < 0.03-0.01) and plasma fasting glucose levels (delta approximately 0.3-0.5 mmol/l, P < 0.05-0.02). GlcN did not change glucose utilization or intracellular metabolism (glucose oxidation and glucose storage were measured by indirect calorimetry) during the clamp. However, high levels of GlcN caused a decrease in SI*-IVGTT (delta approximately 30%, P < 0.02) and in SG* (delta approximately 40%, P < 0.05). Thus, in humans, acute GlcN infusion recapitulates some metabolic features of human diabetes. It remains to be determined whether acceleration of the hexosamine pathway can cause insulin resistance at euglycemia in humans.

Insulin immunization in animal models induces T-helper (Th) 2-like antibody subclass responses to insulin and other beta-cell antigens. The aim of this study was to determine whether exposure to insulin in humans resulted in a similar subclass bias of the humoral immune response. Levels of IgG subclass antibodies to insulin (IAs), GAD, and IA-2 were measured before and after treatment with insulin in the following groups of patients: 29 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes treated with intravenous and/or subcutaneous insulin; 10 newly diagnosed patients randomized to cyclosporin A (CsA) or placebo plus subcutaneous insulin for 12 months; and 14 islet cell antibody-positive relatives receiving either intravenous and subcutaneous insulin prophylaxis or no treatment. At the onset of diabetes, the major subclass distributions of insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) were IgG1 and, to a lesser extent, IgG4. After insulin treatment in the 29 new-onset patients, IAs were initially of the IgG1 subclass. IgG4-IAs appeared later, but at 12 months, they were at higher levels than IgG1-IAs in 11 patients. Responses were higher in children compared with adults and were higher in subjects with IAAs (P < 0.001). Insulin prophylaxis in relatives showed a similar profile, with a decline in levels of IgG1-IAs after cessation of daily subcutaneous insulin. Patients treated with CsA took longer to develop IAs and showed suppressed levels of IgG4-IAs; however, their levels of high-titer IgG1-IAs persistently rebounded after completion of CsA therapy. Despite the presence of IgG4-IAs in most insulin-treated patients and relatives, a shift to IgG4-anti-GAD or IgG4-IA-2 was not found for up to 3 years after the initiation of insulin therapy. While our findings need to be correlated with T-cell cytokine responses, we suggest that the strong IgG4-IA response in insulin-treated patients is consistent with an enhancement of Th2 immunity, but there is no evidence of subsequent spreading of potentially Th2-associated IgG4 responses to other autoantigens.

To study the effect of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) on uncoupling protein-2 (UCP-2) and uncoupling protein-3 (UCP-3) gene expression, a triglyceride emulsion was infused for 5 h in 14 healthy volunteers. A euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was administered concomitantly in 7 of the 14 subjects. The mRNA levels of UCP-2 and of the short (UCP-3S) and long (UCP-3L) isoforms of UCP-3 were quantified by reverse transcription-competitive polymerase chain reaction in tissue biopsies taken before and at the end of the infusion periods. Plasma NEFA concentrations increased from 362+/-52 to 989+/-157 micromol/l (P = 0.018) during triglyceride infusion. UCP-3L (8+/-1 vs. 19+/-2 amol/microg total RNA, P = 0.018) and UCP-3S (11+/-2 vs. 17+/-3 amol/microg total RNA, P = 0.027) mRNA levels increased in skeletal muscle during triglyceride infusion. UCP-3L mRNA levels were positively correlated with plasma NEFA concentrations (r = 0.53, P = 0.005) and with lipid oxidation rates (r = 0.56, P = 0.004) determined by indirect calorimetry. In contrast, the expression of UCP-2 was not affected by lipid infusion in skeletal muscle or in subcutaneous adipose tissue. During the hyperinsulinemic clamp (plasma insulin concentrations 202+/-12 pmol/l), NEFA levels (405+/-49 vs. 648+/-77 micromol/l, P = 0.063) and lipid oxidation rates (0.67+/-0.09 vs. 0.84+/-0.10 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.091) were not significantly increased during triglyceride infusion. Under such conditions, the induction of UCP-3L and UCP-3S mRNA expression was totally prevented (8+/-2 vs. 8+/-1 and 8 +/-2 vs. 9+/-2 amol/microg total RNA, respectively). We conclude that increased plasma NEFA levels by lipid infusion for 5 h induces the expression of UCP-3 but not UCP-2 in humans. During triglyceride infusion, physiological hyperinsulinemia appears to prevent the induction of UCP-3 mRNA levels.

Troglitazone and metformin lower glucose levels in diabetic patients without increasing plasma insulin levels. We compared the insulin sparing actions of these two agents and their effects on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in 20 type 2 diabetic patients. To avoid the confounding effect of improved glycemic control on insulin action and secretion, patients were first rendered euglycemic with 4 weeks of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) before randomization to CSII plus troglitazone (n = 10) or CSII plus metformin (n = 10); euglycemia was maintained for another 6-7 weeks. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp 1) at baseline, 2) after 4 weeks of CSII, and 3) after CSII plus either troglitazone or metformin. The 24-h glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles were performed on the day before the second and third glucose clamps. Good glycemic control was achieved with CSII alone and was maintained with CSII plus an oral agent (mean 24-h glucose: troglitazone, 6.2+/-0.6 mmol/l; metformin, 6.2 +/-0.3 mmol/l). Insulin requirements decreased 53% with troglitazone compared with CSII alone (48+/-4 vs. 102+/-13 U/day, P < 0.001), but only 31% with metformin (76+/-13 vs. 110+/-18 U/day, P < 0.005). The 24-h C-peptide profiles were similar. Normal fasting hepatic glucose output was maintained with both agents despite lower insulin levels than on CSII alone. Insulin sensitivity did not change significantly with CSII alone or with CSII plus metformin, but improved 29% with CSII plus troglitazone (P < 0.005 vs. CSII alone) and was then 45% higher than in the CSII plus metformin patients (P < 0.005). In conclusion, metformin has no effect on insulin-stimulated glucose disposal independent of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Troglitazone (600 mg/day) has greater insulin-sparing effects than metformin (1,700 mg/day) in CSII-treated euglycemic patients. This is probably explained by the peripheral tissue insulin-sensitizing effects of troglitazone.

Nitric oxide (NO) appears to play a role in contraction-stimulated glucose uptake in isolated rodent skeletal muscle; however, no studies have examined this question in humans. Seven healthy men completed two 30-min bouts of supine cycling exercise at 60 +/- 2% peak pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), separated by 90 min of rest. The NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine ([L-NMMA]; total dose 5 mg/kg body weight) or saline (control) were administered via the femoral artery for the final 20 min of exercise in a randomized blinded crossover design. L-Arginine (5 mg/kg body weight) was co-infused during the final 5 min of each exercise bout. Leg blood flow (LBF) was measured by thermodilution in the femoral vein, and leg glucose uptake was calculated as the product of LBF and femoral arteriovenous (AV) glucose difference. L-NMMA infusion significantly (P < 0.05) reduced leg glucose uptake compared with control (48 +/- 12% lower at 15 min, mean +/- SE). The reduction in glucose uptake was due solely to a decrease in AV glucose difference, as there was no effect of L-NMMA infusion on LBF during exercise. Co-infusion of L-arginine restored glucose uptake during L-NMMA infusion to levels similar to control. These results indicate that NO production contributes substantially to exercise-mediated skeletal muscle glucose uptake in humans independent of skeletal muscle blood flow.

Adequate comparisons of the relative performance of different tests of beta-cell function are not available. We compared discrimination of commonly used in vivo tests of beta-cell function across a range of glucose tolerance in seven subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), eight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and nine subjects with type 2 diabetes. In random order, each subject underwent two of each of the following tests: 1) frequently sampled 0.3-g/kg intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) with MinMod analysis; 2) homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) from three samples at 5-min intervals with a model incorporating immunoreactive or specific insulin measurements; and 3) continuous infusion of 180 mg x min(-1) x m(-2) glucose with model assessment (CIGMA) of three samples at 50, 55, and 60 min (1-h CIGMA) and at 110, 115, and 120 min (2-h CIGMA). The discrimination of each test was assessed by the ratio of the within-subject SD to the underlying between-subject SD, the discriminant ratio (DR). The degree to which tests measured the same physiological variable was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient adjusted for attenuation due to test imprecision. An unbiased line of equivalence, taking into account the imprecision of both tests, was used to compare results. Beta-cell function assessed from HOMA and beta-cell function assessed from CIGMA (CIGMA%beta) (using immunoreactive insulin) had higher DRs than first-phase intravenous glucose tolerance test-derived incremental insulin peak, area, insulin-to-glucose index, and acute insulin response to glucose from FSIVGTT-MinMod. CIGMA%beta (immunoreactive insulin) had the highest DR. FSIVGTT-derived first-phase insulin response tests correlated only moderately with HOMA and CIGMA. Using specific rather than immunoreactive insulin for HOMA and CIGMA did not improve discriminatory power. Simple tests such as HOMA and CIGMA, using immunoreactive insulin, offer better beta-cell function discrimination across subjects with NGT, IGT, and type 2 diabetes than measurements derived from FSIVGTT first-phase insulin response.