Locoregional treatment combined with systemic therapy is expected to play a synergistic anticancer role. We conducted this systemic meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib with or without programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (TLP group) compared with TACE + lenvatinib (TL group) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Twelve randomized controlled trials published until 28th Sep 2022 were finally included. Of the total 1746 patients, of whom 458 received sorafenib and TACE treatment (Group S+TACE), and 1288 only underwent TACE (Group TACE), were enrolled. Outcomes including time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), survival rate (SR), and adverse reactions, were extracted. The OS (HR: 0.596, 95 %CI: 0.507-0.685, p < 0.001; I2 = 0.0 %) and TTP (HR: 0.379, 95 %CI: 0.205-0.553, p < 0.001; I2 = 4.5 %) in the S+TACE group were longer than those in the TACE group. The ORR (RR: 2.101, 95 %CI: 1.555-2.839, p < 0.001; I2 = 0.0 %), DCR (RR: 1.547, 95 %CI: 1.126-2.126, p = 0.007; I2 = 79.6 %) and SR (RR: 1.416, 95 %CI: 1.183-1.694, p < 0.001; I2 = 83.8 %) in the S+TACE group were higher than those in the TACE group. Compared with the TCAE group, the higher odds of HFSR, oral ulcer, and diarrhea among patients with HCC complicated by PVTT were discovered in the S+TACE group. The marginal significance was found in ascites and gastrointestinal bleeding between the two groups. Sorafenib plus TACE has good efficacy and mild adverse reactions, which may be worthy of clinical promotion.

This review assesses the efficacy and safety of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and camrelizumab for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is to provide a goal, evidence-based medical foundation for effectively guiding clinical practice.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), prompting numerous clinical trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach in neoadjuvant therapy. This systematic review aims to consolidate and analyze the findings from various clinical trials combining neoadjuvant immunotherapy for HNSCC, with the goal of identifying the most effective neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimen.

Ovarian cancer stands as the third most prevalent gynecological malignancy. The advent of PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, has revolutionized the landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment, demonstrating notable efficacy with minimal toxicity, especially in patients not previously exposed to PARP inhibitors. Rucaparib's precision-driven approach, targeting specific genetic mutations, disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells. This comprehensive review delves into the clinical efficacy and safety profile of rucaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer, showcasing its promising therapeutic approach. A systematic search of studies reporting rucaparib efficacy and safety, up to September 2023, was conducted across various reputable databases and sources. The meta-analysis of seven articles revealed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 0.331 (95% CI, 0.221-0.449; I2 = 92.4%), underscoring rucaparib's efficacy, particularly evident in the BRCA-mutated cohort. Rucaparib consistently outperformed controls in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety evaluations indicated that 98.7% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 61% being grade ≥3. Notable TEAEs included nausea (69.0%), fatigue (66.8%), vomiting (37.3%), and constipation (32.1%). Hematological concerns comprised anemia (47.9%), thrombocytopenia, elevated AST/ALT (37.3%), and serum creatinine levels (19.7%). Despite favourable outcomes, the rucaparib group recorded higher event rates across various metrics than controls. The findings underscore the need for meticulous monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate the increased risks associated with adverse events. International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Identifier: CRD42023459646.

To compare the 2-year efficacy and safety of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) commonly affects patient quality of life and the overall effectiveness of chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) to 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs) and corticosteroids provides clinically meaningful benefits in preventing CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).

To date, no meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and adjuvant immunotherapies (IMTs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients using reconstructed individual patient data (IPD). This study aims to fill that gap by assessing the efficacy and safety profiles of these treatments in such patients.

Some of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases enhance somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene within the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) domain. In such cases, first-line treatments are EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients, focusing on osimertinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib.

Breast cancer, particularly the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) subtype, remains a major global health concern. Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, has shown promising results in treating advanced cases. This study comprehensively assesses the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Drug resistance in colorectal cancer (CRC) is modulated by multiple molecular factors, which can be ascertained through genetic investigation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within key genes have the potential to impair the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Therefore, the identification of SNPs linked to drug resistance can significantly contribute to the advancement of tailored therapeutic approaches and the enhancement of treatment outcomes in patients with CRC.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Previous studies have shown that the poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) improve the treatment response of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). However, the efficacy and safety of various PARPis in mCRPC patients remain unclear, presenting a significant challenge for clinicians when making treatment decisions. To address this, this study conducted two indirect comparisons to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) in patients with mCRPC.

Despite significant advances in breast cancer control and survival with endocrine therapies (ETs), treatment utilization and outcomes in developing countries have not been adequately explored. This review evaluated ET adherence, potential benefits, and harms in populations across developing countries.

Although the intervention for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved and survival time has increased, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) and PARP inhibitors (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors, PARPis) is still controversial. Previous studies revealed that the combined use of ICIs and PARPis led to increased antitumor activity. However, most of these combined regimens are nonrandomized controlled trials with small sample sizes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with PARPis in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. The results including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs), were subjected to further analysis. Four studies involving 110 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The combined ORR and DCR were 23.6% and 53.6%, respectively; while the ORR and DCR of BRCAmut patients were 38.1% and 71.4%, respectively. The median PFS of the patients was 4.29 months. As for safety, the most common AEs were nausea (49.0%), anemia (44.3%) and fatigue (40.6%). Most of them were grade 1 or 2, and the incidence of adverse events ≥ III was obviously low. Except for anemia, the incidence of AEs ≥ III was < 10%. This meta-analysis revealed that the combination of ICIs and PARPis has good efficacy and safety for advanced or metastatic TNBC patients.

Venetoclax synergizes with low-intensity regimens such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). However, less is known about the clinical activity of venetoclax combined with HMAs or LDAC. Therefore, the current study focused on assessing the clinical efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for response to these venetoclax-based regimens in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A comprehensive search for literature related to our study objective was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager or the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. In addition, methodological quality evaluation of nonrandomized studies was conducted using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, while bias assessment of randomized studies was performed with Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Twelve studies, including 1432 elderly AML patients treated with venetoclax-based regimens, were identified for review and analysis. The pooled analysis showed that the rate of complete response with or without incomplete blood count recovery (CR/CRi) and overall response rate (ORR) among patients treated with venetoclax and HMAs was 59% and 64%, respectively. On the other hand, an CR/CRi of 50% was observed in patients treated with venetoclax and LDAC. Furthermore, venetoclax combined with HMAs demonstrated a significant survival benefit over HMAs alone and intensive chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.68; P < .00001). The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic disorder, nonhematological event, and infection in AML patients treated with venetoclax and HMAs were febrile neutropenia (39%), hypokalemia (12%), and pneumonia (19%), respectively. Conversely, thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia, and pneumonia were more common in patients treated with venetoclax and LDAC (41%, 15%, and 12%, respectively). Venetoclax combined with HMAs or LDAC has good clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with AML.

Inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway activation may hinder the occurrence and progression of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PI3K/AKT inhibitors and determine the most appropriate inhibitor for different cancer types.

To determine the clinical benefit of monotherapy with AKT inhibitors in patients diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Recent studies have investigated the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer. However, there is an ongoing debate about the optimal approach for integrating this strategy.

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced digestive system neoplasms (DSNs).

Bleomycin, originally an antitumor drug, was explored as a pathological scar treatment in the mid-1990s. However, its efficacy and safety profile varies among individuals.