Since idiopathic inflammatory myositis is relatively uncommon, randomized placebo controlled trials are rare. Although corticosteroids have not been tested in randomized controlled trials, general clinical consensus among physicians has accepted it as effective therapy. However, corticosteroid toxicity leads to significant disability in many patients. For patients with refractory dermatomyositis, intravenous immunoglobulin is an effective short-term treatment but its long-term effect remains unknown. Immunosuppressants are commonly used in refractory inflammatory myositis; evidence for their efficacy, with very few exceptions, has been derived from case reports and open studies with small numbers of patients. Even in randomized trials, the lack of validated and generally accepted outcome measures makes it difficult to compare the effect of interventions in different studies. Although the balance of evidence suggests that immunosuppressants are equally effective in dermatomyositis and polymyositis, there are no randomized controlled trials to show if any of these drugs, individually or in combination, is best. For uncommon diseases, such as inflammatory myositis, only multicentre randomized controlled trials involving rheumatologists and neurologists will define the optimal therapy.

Therapeutic ultrasound is one of the most common treatments used in the management of soft tissue lesions, which constitute the majority of rheumatic complaints. Although many laboratory-based research studies have demonstrated a number of physiological effects of ultrasound upon living tissue, there is remarkably little evidence for benefit in the treatment of soft tissue injuries. This may be related to several confounding factors, including technical variables, the complexity and variety of underlying pathologies in soft tissue lesions, methodological limitations of clinical studies, or true lack of effect. In this review the scientific basis for the use of therapeutic ultrasound in soft tissue lesions and the existing evidence relating to its clinical effect are detailed.

In order to develop a preliminary core set of disease outcome measures for use in clinical trials of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), we evaluated those measures used in previous trials, assessed the validation of published instruments and discussed these at an international consensus conference. The initial proposals were further refined by a multidisciplinary group of adult and paediatric specialists experienced in IIM using the Delphi method. The proposed preliminary core set of disease activity measures consists of five domains: physician and patient/parent global assessments of disease activity; muscle strength; physical function; serum activity of muscle enzymes; and an assessment tool to capture extra-skeletal muscle disease activity. The group recommended further development of a core set of disease damage measures for assessment of persistent changes in anatomy, pathology and function of at least 6 months' duration. The group recommended that patient-reported outcomes should include generic health-related quality of life assessments using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) health survey in adult IIM patients and a validated quality of life instrument for paediatric patients. We propose the core set of outcome measures as a minimum group of assessments to include in all IIM therapeutic studies. The use of this core set should assist in standardizing outcome measurement and in optimizing therapeutic trials in myositis.

The concepts of early intervention and early arthritis clinics for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were introduced almost a decade ago. The evidence for these is diverse and the best therapeutic approach remains vehemently debated. This review addresses these issues.

Limitations in the conventional medical management of osteoarthritis indicate a real need for safe and effective treatment of osteoarthritis patients. Herbal medicines may provide a solution to this problem. The aim of this article was to review systematically all randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of herbal medicines in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Anti-T-cell monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) form a unique class of therapeutic agent. Their precise specificity offers tremendous potential for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases but also prevents meaningful preclinical animal studies. In particular, adverse reactions to therapy may be unanticipated, and the first administration of a novel T-cell mAb to a patient thus marks the beginning of a unique experiment. By comparing clinical parameters and laboratory measurements, small-scale pilot studies can provide detailed information about mAb biology that both predicts and suggests solutions to the complications of therapy. In this essay I illustrate this concept with reference to three specific areas: lymphocyte depletion, mAb immunogenicity and cytokine-release syndromes. In each case, systematic clinical and laboratory science has improved our understanding of the problem and suggested solutions; most of these solutions have been or are being adopted. Thus, small, open studies are an essential step in the development of novel mAbs, provide an ideal platform for the study of mAb biology, and serve as an early warning system for potential adverse effects.