Patients with advanced solid tumors may be included in phase I clinical trials. In such studies, the benefit expected is generally lower than the likelihood of toxicity and may even be non-existent if the patient's life expectancy is too short. This study was performed to identify prognostic variables for toxicity and survival in patients who participate in phase I clinical trials.

To compare luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists with orchiectomy or diethylstilbestrol, and to compare antiandrogens with any of these three alternatives.

The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and vigor in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Five studies that measured fatigue and vigor with the Profile of Mood States were used to describe the pattern of CRF and vigor during and after both types of treatment. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to determine differences over time in each study. Results demonstrate different patterns of CRF for patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Chemotherapy-related CRF peaks in the days after chemotherapy, whereas radiation therapy-related CRF gradually accumulates over the course of treatment. The CRF associated with both forms of treatment gradually declines over time. The prevalence, intensity, and persistence of CRF during treatment and for months after treatment is complete make this symptom one that cannot be ignored.

As part of an NHS Executive Trent regional initiative we considered the role and cost-effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy in the treatment of relapsed Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The key trials and case series show an additional patient benefit of 0.8-1.1 life years over standard chemotherapy. We estimate incremental cost per life year gained of 12 800 pound silver-17 600 pound silver, which reduces further if long-term benefits are considered. High dose chemotherapy in these conditions is both life-saving and cost-effective.

A meta-analysis of six North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials involving patients receiving their first ever fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy was undertaken to explore the association of sex with reports of the incidence and severity of stomatitis.

Meta-analysis of all clinical data was conducted to compare toremifene 40-60 mg/day (TOR) with tamoxifen 20-40 mg/day (TAM) in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive or ER unknown advanced breast cancer and assess factors predicting treatment outcome. Data from five randomized parallel group studies (all studies) were combined. Efficacy variables were the response rate in all studies and also the time to treatment failure and survival in the three major studies (pivotal studies). Of the 1421 patients, 725 received TOR and 696 TAM. Response rates were 24.0% and 25.3%, respectively (p = 0.675) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference -5.3 to 3.4. Of the 1157 patients in the pivotal studies, 75% had progressed and 50% expired. Median treatment times were 4.9 months in TOR and 5.3 months in TAM groups (p = 0.762, hazard ratio 0.98 with 95% CI 0.87-1.11). Median survival times were 31.0 (TOR) and 33.1 (TAM) months (p = 0.758, hazard ratio 0.98 with 95% CI 0.83-1.15). All results are consistent with the criteria of statistical equivalence between TOR and TAM. More patients in TAM (20%) than in TOR (14%, p = 0.007) discontinued the treatment prematurely but overall the treatments were well tolerated. As the treatments were equally effective all data were analyzed together for predictive factors. High tumor ER concentration, long disease free time, soft tissue metastases, few metastatic sites, and good performance status all independently predicted longer survival (p<0.001). Previous adjuvant tamoxifen predicted shorter survival (p = 0.008). Objective response to treatment or disease stabilization for at least 12 months both predicted prolonged survival (p = 0.001). TOR 60 mg/day and TAM are equally effective and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Probability of survival may be predicted based on patient characteristics and on the initial response to the treatment.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres (CRLCC) and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

Paclitaxel was the first identified member of a new class of anticancer drugs known as the taxanes. This compound has significant single-agent activity against a number of solid tumors including nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the first-line setting, single-agent paclitaxel has been studied on a number of different schedules and dose levels. Initial studies were done on the 24-h infusion schedule with doses of 200-250 mg/m2. Response rates were 21%-24%. Median survival ranged from six to nine months with one-year survival rates of 38%-42%. The major toxicity of this infusion schedule was myelosuppression, mainly neutropenia. Subsequent single-agent studies employed shorter infusion durations (three hours), with doses ranging from 175-225 mg/m2. The cumulative experience of the 3-h infusion schedule shows an overall response rate of 28.5% with median survival of 6-11 months and a one-year survival of 37.5%. Similar results were obtained in the one study examining the 1-h infusion schedule with doses ranging from 135-200 mg/m2. The major toxicities of the shorter infusion schedule include neutropenia, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia syndrome. Weekly administration of paclitaxel also showed significant activity in advanced, metastatic NSCLC. Overall response rates have ranged from 30%-56% in the phase I/II setting with one-year survival rates of 42%-53%. A recently completed phase III trial comparing single-agent paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 over three hours every three weeks to best supportive care (BSC) in advanced or metastatic NSCLC has shown a survival advantage for the single-agent paclitaxel arm (median survival 6.8 months for paclitaxel versus 4.8 months for BSC, p = 0.045). An ongoing phase III trial is comparing single-agent paclitaxel to the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CALGB 9730) in advanced, metastatic NSCLC. Paclitaxel has also been studied in the second-line setting. Infusion schedules have ranged from 1 h, 24 h and 96 h on an every-three-week schedule. Weekly paclitaxel has also been evaluated in the second-line setting. Although the overall experience is limited, response rates have ranged from 0%-38%. The overall role of single-agent paclitaxel in prolonging survival and improving quality of life remains uncertain in this setting. The cumulative experience of single-agent paclitaxel in advanced, metastatic NSCLC suggests that it is a highly active cytotoxic agent in this setting. The consistent finding of a 35%-40% one-year survival rate is notable. The major toxicities include neutropenia, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia syndrome. Given the overall activity and impact on survival along with an acceptable toxicity profile, single-agent paclitaxel warrants comparison to other active agents and combination regimens in advanced, metastatic NSCLC.

The disappointing results of chemotherapy in glioblastoma might be caused by the choices of agents, which mostly include nitrosurea. We compared the in vitro efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, developing a method to summarize published data.

Is there a role for the use of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?

Cure is possible by resecting colorectal isolated liver metastases. In non-resectable isolated colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), regional chemotherapy has been advocated to optimize the disease control in the liver in order to improve the results of the alternative, systemic chemotherapy. The drugs are delivered by means of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) via ports or pumps; pharmacological modifications of the hepatic arterial blood-flow-like HAI with starch microspheres or stop-flow and perfusion techniques were applied to improve HAI.

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Accumulating evidence indicates that postmenopausal hormone therapy may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in women.

Oral 5-fluorouracil and its prodrugs (tegafur, carmofur) is now being studied for adjuvant chemotherapy of curatively resected colorectal cancers. To evaluate the effect of these oral fluoropyrimidines (o-FPs), an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was performed in Japan as an inter-trialist group study.

Owing to the wide spread perception of a possible benefit from paclitaxel in the second-line situation the Nordic Gynecologic Oncology Group (NGOG) conducted two prospective phase II studies of paclitaxel single agent treatment (175 mg/m2, three-hour i.v. infusion with standard pre-medication every third week) in patients with relapsing or progressing epithelial ovarian cancer following platinum.

To compare combination chemotherapy (CCT) versus melphalan plus prednisone (MP) as treatment for multiple myeloma.

A meta-analysis of 55 prospective randomized clinical trials including more than 37,000 patients has analyzed the effectiveness of tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. Standard treatment consists of 20 mg tamoxifen daily for 5 years in patients with either a positive estrogen receptor or a positive progesterone receptor status. This treatment achieves a 50% improvement of the 5-year relapse-free survival and a 28% improvement of the overall survival. Tamoxifen is effective in lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive patients as well as in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. The combination of chemotherapy with hormonal treatment is even more effective and brings a further improvement of survival of 50%. In addition, tamoxifen reduces the number of contralateral breast cancer cases to 50%, but increase the occurrence of endometrial cancers from 1.2/1,000 breast cancer patients within 10 years to 4.4/1,000 women. In conclusion, tamoxifen 20 mg daily for 5 years is the standard treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

A collaborative overview, using individual patient data, has been performed to compare idarubicin versus daunorubicin or other anthracyclines, when used with cytosine arabinoside as induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. There were 1052 patients in five trials versus daunorubicin, 100 in one trial versus doxorubicin, and 745 in one trial versus zorubicin. In the trials of idarubicin versus daunorubicin, early induction failures were similar with the two treatments (20% idarubicin v 18% daunorubicin: P = 0.4), but after day 40 the later induction failures were fewer with idarubicin (17% v 29%: P < 0.0001). Therefore complete remission rates were higher with idarubicin (62% v 53%; P = 0.002). Among remitters, fewer of the patients allocated to idarubicin relapsed (P = 0.008) but slightly more died in remission, leading to a non-significant benefit (P = 0.07) in disease-free survival. Overall survival in these five trials was significantly better with idarubicin than with daunorubicin (13% v 9% alive at 5 years; P = 0.03). There was a trend (P = 0.006 for remission rate) for the benefit of idarubicin over daunorubicin to decrease with increasing age. There were no significant differences in outcome in the small trial comparing idarubicin versus doxorubicin, or in the large trial comparing idarubicin versus zorubicin. The induction regimens based on idarubicin achieved, in the particular circumstances of the trials reviewed here, better remission rates and better overall survival than those based on daunorubicin.

To construct a single scale for comparing the dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer.

Controversies surrounding medical treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma continue to persist.