Studies done both in laboratory animals and humans suggest that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use may reduce the risk of developing lung cancer. Many epidemiologic studies exploring this association lacked sufficient power to draw definitive conclusions. We conducted a metaanalysis to examine the effect of NSAID use on the risk of lung cancer.

To examine the relationship between international normalized ratio (INR) and outcomes (major bleeding events and strokes) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving anticoagulation with warfarin.

beta-Adrenergic agonists exert physiologic effects that are the opposite of those of beta-blockers. beta-Blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiac disease. beta(2)-Agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease has been associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrest, and acute cardiac death.

The potential benefits of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for patients with COPD remains inconclusive, as most studies have included only a small number of patients. We therefore undertook a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared nocturnal NIPPV with conventional management in patients with COPD and stable respiratory failure.

To summarize the available data on COPD prevalence and assess reasons for conflicting prevalence estimates in the published literature.

Low-dose dopamine administration (ie, doses < 5 microg/kg/min) has been advocated for 30 years as therapy in oliguric patients on the basis of its action on dopaminergic renal receptors. Recently, a large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial has demonstrated that low-dose dopamine administered to critically ill patients who are at risk of renal failure does not confer clinically significant protection from renal dysfunction. In this review, we present the best evidence and summarize the effects of low-dose dopamine infusion in critically ill patients. We review the history and physiology of low-dose dopamine administration and discuss the reasons why dopamine is not clinically effective in the critically ill. In addition to the lack of renal efficacy, we present evidence that low-dose dopamine administration worsens splanchnic oxygenation, impairs GI function, impairs the endocrine and immunologic systems, and blunts ventilatory drive. We conclude that there is no justification for the use of low-dose dopamine administration in the critically ill.

To determine the effect of the addition of heliox to standard medical care on the course of acute asthma.

To evaluate, by systematic review, the efficacy of heliox on respiratory mechanics and outcomes in patients with acute asthma.

To determine the benefit of IV beta(2)-agonists for severe acute asthma treated in the emergency department (ED).

Since the late 1980s, there has been considerable clinical and academic interest in the use of continuous aerosolized bronchodilators for the treatment of patients with acute asthma. These studies have suggested that this therapy is safe, is at least as effective as intermittent nebulization, and may be superior to intermittent nebulization in patients with the most severely impaired pulmonary function.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes are important proinflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of asthma. Since bronchial hyperresponsiveness is a noninvasive surrogate marker of asthmatic airway inflammation, we evaluated the bronchoprotection afforded by leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs).

To determine multilevel likelihood ratios for pleural fluid tests that are commonly used to discriminate between exudative and transudative pleural effusions.

Oral corticosteroids (CS) are standard treatment for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) after treatment for acute asthma. Several recent, relatively small trials have investigated the replacement of CS with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), with varied results and conclusions. This systematic review examined the effect of using ICS in place of CS on outcomes in this setting.

The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias remains high following open-heart surgery. The most common of these arrhythmias are atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF), for which treatment is not well defined. Recent studies have focused on prophylactically treating patients in an attempt to reduce postoperative AFF. Several studies have shown that sotalol and amiodarone are both effective in reducing AFF following heart surgery. However, no studies have been done comparing both drugs.

To compare the sarcoidosis mortality in referral settings (RS) and population-based settings (PS), and to identify the contribution of stage, ethnicity, and corticosteroid therapy (CST) to their disparate outcomes.

We identified 10 randomized trials that compared alternative management approaches to patient care during and following cardiovascular surgery. One overall strategy involved a modification of anesthesia, in particular, a reduction in the dosage of fentanyl and benzodiazepine or the substitution of fentanyl for propofol (five randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Pooled results show a shorter duration of ventilation (7 h) and a shorter duration of hospital stay (approximately 1 day) associated with lower anesthetic doses. The second strategy involved early vs late extubation once patients were admitted to the ICU (five RCTs). Pooled results show a shorter duration of ventilation (13 h) and a shorter duration of ICU stay (half a day) associated with early extubation. An additional 8 nonrandomized trials had findings that were consistent with the 10 RCTs. Reintubation, complications, and mortality rates were too low to draw conclusions about these outcomes. Overall, these studies indicate that anesthetic, sedation, and early-extubation strategies in selected cardiac surgery patients are associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and shorter lengths of ICU and hospital stays.

We found eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of miscellaneous interventions that were designed to facilitate the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation. The two RCTs of high-fat/low-carbohydrate enteral nutrition found favorable physiologic effects on CO2 production and respiratory quotient, rendering this type of nutrition potentially useful in patients with impaired ventilatory reserve; however, no conclusions can be made about the outcomes of the duration of ventilation and weaning success. The two RCTs of postextubation use of noninvasive ventilation are conflicting, showing potential short-term physiologic benefit in one study, but no benefit in terms of reintubation rates or other morbidity. These RCTs are less promising than other applications of noninvasive ventilation such as those in patients with COPD exacerbations. One RCT showed no improvement in success of weaning with exogenous growth hormone administration. In the setting of very frequent baseline blood gas analyses, one RCT of oximetry and capnography was associated with significantly fewer blood gas analyses. Biofeedback to enhance safe and rapid weaning showed a dramatically lower duration of ventilation in one RCT that did not report the weaning methods used. One RCT of preextubation acupuncture showed lower rates of laryngospasm in the acupuncture group. Overall, these studies were underpowered for clinically important outcomes. Multidisciplinary, patient-centered, holistic, and non-pulmonary approaches to weaning may provide additional safe, effective adjunctive methods of hastening liberation from mechanical ventilation.

We identified 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of methods for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation, 8 of which were trials of discontinuation assessment strategies, 5 of which were trials of stepwise reduction in mechanical ventilatory support, and 3 of which were trials comparing alternative ventilation modes for weaning periods lasting < 48 h. We found that different thresholds for deciding when a patient is ready for a trial of spontaneous breathing, different criteria for a successful trial, and different thresholds for extubation may overwhelm the impact of alternative ventilation strategies. Nevertheless, the results of these studies suggest the possibility that multiple daily T-piece weaning or pressure support may be superior to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Other RCTs suggest that early extubation with the back-up institution of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as needed may be a useful strategy in selected patients.

We identified 65 observational studies of weaning predictors that had been reported in 70 publications. After grouping predictors with similar names but different thresholds, the following predictors met our relevance criteria: heterogeneous populations, 51; COPD patients, 21; and cardiovascular ICU patients, 45. Many variables were of no use in predicting the results of weaning. Moreover, few variables had been studied in > 50 patients or had results presented to generate estimates of predictive power. For stepwise reductions in mechanical support, the most promising predictors were a rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) < 65 breaths/min/L (measured using the ventilator settings that were in effect at the time that the prediction was made) and a pressure time product < 275 cm H2O/L/s. The pooled likelihood ratios (LRs) were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.28) for a respiratory rate [RR] of < 38 breaths/min and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.06 to 1.71) for an RR of > 38 breaths/min, which indicate that an RR of < 38 breaths/min leaves the probability of successful weaning virtually unchanged but that a value of > 38 breaths/min leads to a small reduction in the probability of success in weaning the level of mechanical support. For trials of unassisted breathing, the most promising weaning predictors include the following: RR; RSBI; a product of RSBI and occlusion pressure < 450 cm H2O breaths/min/L; maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) < 20 cm H2O; and a knowledge-based system for adjusting pressure support. Pooled results for the power of a positive test result for both RR and RSBI were limited (highest LR, 2.23), while the power of a negative test result was substantial (ie, LR, 0.09 to 0.23). Summary data suggest a similar predictive power for RR and RSBI. In the prediction of successful extubation, an RR of < 38 breaths/min (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 47%), an RSBI < 100 or 105 breaths/min/L (sensitivity, 65 to 96%; specificity, 0 to 73%), PImax, and APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II scores that are obtained at hospital admission appear to be the most promising. After pooling, two variables appeared to have some value. An RR of > 38 breaths/min and an RSBI of > 100 breaths/min/L appear to reduce the probability of successful extubation, and PImax < 0.3, for which the pooled LR is 2.23 (95% CI, 1.15 to 4.34), appears to marginally increase the likelihood of successful extubation. Judging by areas under the receiver operator curve for all variables, none of these variables demonstrate more than modest accuracy in predicting weaning outcome. Why do most of these tests perform so poorly? The likely explanation is that clinicians have already considered the results when they choose patients for trials of weaning.