Anti-cancer drugs can be toxic to healthy cells in the body and have the potential to cause irreversible damage to ovarian tissue. This may lead to premature ovarian insufficiency. There are two main strategies to preserve fertility in women undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer. One is controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropins and a protective agent for safety, followed by freezing of oocytes or embryos; the other is ovarian suppression using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH agonists). This review aims to gain an understanding of the best way to support women with cancer to preserve their fertility. As breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, it is the primary focus of this review.

PurposeTo comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PARP inhibitor-chemotherapy combinations. Studies reporting progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety outcomes were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, and a meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.ResultsOf 970 studies retrieved, four RCTs involving 1064 patients met the inclusion criteria. PARP inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.84, P < .0001) and showed a trend towards improved OS (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.09, P = .36), though this was not statistically significant. There was no significant improvement in ORR (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.20, P = .13). Regarding safety, no significant difference was observed in all grades or grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) overall, but the combination therapy was associated with an increased risk of anemia, nausea, and diarrhea (RRs ranging from 1.14 to 1.29, all P < .01).ConclusionPARP inhibitor combined with chemotherapy is an effective option for the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer, but its potential increased risks of specific AEs need to be weighed. Clinicians should make individualized treatment plans according to the specific conditions of patients, comprehensive consideration of efficacy and safety.

The efficacy of regorafenib or fruquintinib in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment has not been elucidated. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy.

The incidence of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is increasing, but data relating to perinatal outcomes for infants exposed to systemic cancer treatment in utero remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence from the available literature to investigate whether perinatal outcomes for babies born to women with gestational cancer differ based on whether they are exposed to systemic cancer treatment in utero.

To investigate the prophylactic effect of compression therapy against chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) through meta-analytic evaluation.

Combination of multiple therapies is a common approach to treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). The impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on prognosis in uHCC patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib remains unclear.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve survival in lung cancer patients. However, checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) remains a critical safety concern. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates demographic, clinical, and laboratory risk factors associated with CIP development to guide risk-stratified management.

This review aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise-based interventions on cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) in individuals with cancer.

The aim of this study was to reveal the hepatotoxicity profile of different immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) used strategies in patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by meta-analysis.

Cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (cis-AKI) is not rare in oncological patients clinically, but there are limited prevention and treatment methods available. The efficacy of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in mitigating cis-AKI has been studied and determined in animal models.

To minimise healthcare exposure in the COVID 19 era, 6-weekly extended dosing pembrolizumab became widely accepted as an alternative to 3-weekly dosing based on modelling studies. A review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the real-world safety of 6-weekly pembrolizumab in relation to 3-weekly dosing.

The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy (CT) regimens has become a critical focus of clinical investigation in the management of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma over the past several years. Recent phase 3 trials have yielded diverse outcomes, sparking significant debate within the oncological community. In response to these disparate findings, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of this strategy.

Adverse events of anticancer treatment were common and debilitating in cancer patients. Traditional Chinese medicine injection (TCMI) plays an important role in the comprehensive treatment of cancer in China.

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the hematologic toxicity profiles, toxicity spectrum, and safety rankings of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for digestive system tumors. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was anemia, while secondary outcomes included neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased, leukopenia, white blood cell (WBC) count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and febrile neutropenia (FN). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type, country category, study phase, ICI regimen, control group, chemotherapy regimen, ICI plus different chemotherapy regimens. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data according to pre-specified criteria, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.4 software was utilized to visualize the risk of bias assessments. Stata 16.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. 25 phase II and III RCTs (n = 15216) were included. The general safety of ICIs ranked from high to low for grade 1-5 anemia were as follows: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab. For grade 3-5 anemia, the general safety profile of the ICIs were as follows, from highest to lowest: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, and camrelizumab. Compared to chemotherapy, treatment-related hematologic toxicities with ICIs occurred primarily in grade 1-5 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and WBC count decreased. Taking ICI monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab were generally safer than taking chemotherapy, one ICI drug with chemotherapy, or two ICI drugs with chemotherapy. In terms of grade 1-5 hematologic toxicities, tislelizumab had the highest risk of neutropenia and leukopenia; the primary treatment-adverse events (AEs) for sintilimab was neutrophil count decreased and WBC count decreased; the primary treatment-related AE associated with nivolumab was platelet count decreased; camrelizumab posed the highest risk for lymphocyte count decreased. In terms of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities, pembrolizumab was predominantly linked to neutropenia; sintilimab showed the greatest risk for neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and lymphocyte count decreased; avelumab was most associated with WBC count decreased. FN primarily manifested as grade 3-5, with camrelizumab having the highest risk. Among agents used in gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, avelumab demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for anemia. Each treatment regimen has its unique safety profile. Early identification and management of ICI-related hematologic toxicities are essential in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024571508.

This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating advanced cervical cancer, emphasizing their potential as transformative therapeutic options in this complex clinical landscape.

Patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at increased risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. The mechanism is incompletely understood but may involve accelerated atherosclerosis due to enhanced inflammation. Pre-clinical studies may provide insight in these mechanisms.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy with limited treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 bispecific antibody, has shown promising results in clinical trials and real-world studies.

Drug repurposing may be an efficient strategy for identifying new cancer treatments. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent that affects the plasminogen-plasmin pathway, may have potential anticancer effects by influencing tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, inflammation, immune response, and tissue remodeling-all crucial processes contributing to tumor progression and metastasis.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used for patients with cancer, evidence of the impact of ICIs on the incidence of arthralgia remains limited.

BackgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the serious complications of diabetes mellitus. Laser therapy is the traditional treatment for DR, and the role of vitreous injection of ranibizumab in DR requires evaluation. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of ranibizumab combined with laser versus laser monotherapy in treating diabetic retinopathy.Method: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases, from their inception to October 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of ranibizumab combined with laser versus laser monotherapy in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy were searched. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool to evaluate the risk of bias.ResultsOur analysis included 18 studies. The improvement time for retinal edema in the ranibizumab combined with the laser group was significantly shorter than that in the laser monotherapy group (P < 0.05). The time to absorb fundus hemorrhage in the ranibizumab combined with the laser group was significantly shorter than that in the laser monotherapy group (P < 0.05). The absorption time of fundus exudation in the ranibizumab combined with the laser group was significantly lower than that of the laser monotherapy group (P < 0.05). The rate of improvement in vision in the ranibizumab combined with the laser group was significantly higher than that of the laser monotherapy group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions (P > 0.05) and retinal thickness in the macula (P > 0.05) between ranibizumab combined with the laser group and the laser monotherapy group.ConclusionThe combination of ranibizumab and laser for diabetic retinopathy is more effective than laser monotherapy.