Current and emerging strategies to therapeutically target weight management include pairing agonism of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) with either agonism or antagonism of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR). On the surface, these two approaches seem contradictory, yet they have produced similar effects for weight loss in clinical studies. Arguments that support the rationale for both approaches are made in these point-counterpoint articles, founded on preclinical studies, human genetics, and clinical outcomes. Here, we attempt to reconcile how two opposing approaches can produce similar effects on body weight by evaluating the leading hypotheses derived from the available evidence.

Islet cell replacement therapies have evolved as a viable treatment option for type 1 diabetes complicated by problematic hypoglycemia and glycemic lability. Refinements of islet manufacturing, islet transplantation procedures, peritransplant recipient management, and immunosuppressive protocols allowed most recipients to achieve favorable outcomes. Subsequent phase 3 trials of transplantation of deceased donor islets documented the effectiveness of transplanted islets in restoring near-normoglycemia, glycemic stability, and protection from severe hypoglycemia, with an acceptable safety profile for the enrolled high-risk population. Health authorities in several countries have approved deceased donor islet transplantation for treating patients with type 1 diabetes and recurrent severe hypoglycemia. These achievements amplified academic and industry efforts to generate pluripotent stem cell-derived β-cells through directed differentiation for β-cell replacement. Preliminary results of ongoing clinical trials suggest that the transplantation of stem cell-derived β-cells can consistently restore insulin independence in immunosuppressed recipients with type 1 diabetes, thus signaling the profound progress made in generating an unlimited and a uniform supply of cells for transplant. Avoiding the risks of chronic immunosuppression represents the next frontier. Several strategies have entered or are approaching clinical investigation, including immune-isolating islets, engineering immune-privileged islet implantation sites, rendering islets immune evasive, and inducing immune tolerance in transplanted islets. Capitalizing on high-dimensional, multiomic technologies for deep profiling of graft-directed immunity and the fate of the graft will provide new insights that promise to translate into sustaining functional graft survival long-term. Leveraging these parallel progression paths will facilitate the wider clinical adoption of cell replacement therapies in diabetes care.

The identification of a "rundlichen Häuflein" by Paul Langerhans more than 150 years ago marked the initiation of a global effort to unravel the mysteries of pancreatic islets, an intricate system of nutrient-sensing, hormone-secreting, and signaling cells. In type 1 diabetes, this interconnected network is vulnerable to malfunction and immune attack, with strategies to prevent or repair islet damage still in their infancy. In 2014, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) established the Human Islet Research Network (HIRN) to accelerate our understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of type 1 diabetes development. In this article, investigators from the HIRN detail pioneering advances, technologies, and systems that contextualize insulin-producing β-cells and other related cells within their physiological environment. Disease models, devices, and therapies are evaluated by the HIRN in light of promising functional and mechanistic data. Collaborative relationships and opportunities within this network are emphasized as a means of enhancing the quality of innovative research and talent in science. Topics are developed through a series of questions, achievements, and milestones, with the 75th anniversary of the NIDDK as an opportunity to reflect on the past, present, and future of type 1 diabetes research.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with diabetes. Individuals with type 1 diabetes have a two- to fourfold higher risk of CVD in comparison with the general population, driven by an earlier onset and increased lifetime incidence of CVD events and mortality. Similarly, type 2 diabetes confers two- to threefold increased CVD risk, usually alongside metabolic syndrome, obesity, and hypertension. Despite advancements in methods for achieving glycemic control, the CVD burden remains disproportionately high in diabetes. The mechanisms driving elevated risk are complex and variably multifactorial, involving hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and a hypercoagulable state. Unfortunately, critical gaps in understanding persist on how these factors interact to promote CVD in type 1 versus type 2 diabetes, particularly across disease stages and age. Addressing these knowledge gaps is essential to developing targeted therapies that can effectively mitigate CVD risk. To meet this need, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, in partnership with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, recently formed the Cardiovascular Repository for Type 1 Diabetes (CaRe-T1D) program. Its mission is to elucidate the molecular and cellular pathways linking diabetes with CVD through the provision of high-quality human tissues for investigator-led analyses using cutting-edge technologies and collaborative data sharing to advance precision medicine and reduce the global burden of diabetes-associated cardiovascular complications.

In the last two decades, significant progress has been made toward understanding the genetic basis of type 2 diabetes. An important supporter of this research has been the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), most recently through the Accelerating Medicines Partnership Program for Type 2 Diabetes (AMP T2D) and Accelerating Medicines Partnership Program for Common Metabolic Diseases (AMP CMD). These public-private partnerships of the National Institutes of Health, multiple biopharmaceutical and life sciences companies, and nonprofit organizations, facilitated and managed by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, were designed to improve understanding of therapeutically relevant biological pathways for type 2 diabetes. On the occasion of NIDDK's 75th anniversary, we review the history of NIDDK support for these partnerships, which saw the convergence of research directions prioritized by academic consortia, the pharmaceutical industry, and government funders. Although the NIDDK was not the sole originator or funder of these efforts, its support and leadership have been pivotal to the partnerships' success and have enabled their research to be broadly accessible through the AMP Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal (CMDKP) and the AMP Common Metabolic Diseases Genome Atlas (CMDGA). Findings from AMP CMD align with NIDDK's mission to conduct research and share results with the goal of improving health and quality of life.

This year marks the 75th anniversary of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health. NIDDK's long history of research and innovation includes support of four types of collaborative research centers focused on diabetes, endocrinology, and metabolic diseases. The Diabetes Research Centers promote basic and clinical diabetes research, while the Centers for Diabetes Translation Research conduct diabetes research across the translation science spectrum. The Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center (MMPC)-Live program provides the research community with standardized phenotyping services for mouse models of diabetes and obesity, and the Cystic Fibrosis Research and Translation Centers advance basic, preclinical, and clinical research for cystic fibrosis. These centers have evolved over time in response to new scientific opportunities and to expand their reach to be an asset to the larger scientific community. Looking to the future, NIDDK will continue to ensure that these centers enhance the research community, foster novel and synergistic scientific collaborations, and promote career development of scientists in the early stages of their careers. We will also ensure that our centers align with NIDDK's goal of improving health outcomes for all people with and at risk for diseases, within our mission.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. It is generally defined as glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The pathogenesis of GDM has long been attributed to inadequate pancreatic β-cell compensation for the physiological insulin resistance of pregnancy. This defect is thought to resolve after pregnancy but become manifest in later life as an increased risk of diabetes. Examination of mechanisms underlying GDM does not support this commonly held picture. In this Perspective, we present evidence that, like diabetes outside of pregnancy, GDM has no single etiology. It results from multiple causes of a common physiological manifestation, inadequate β-cell function, which leads to a common clinical manifestation, elevated glucose levels. We provide evidence that GDM often represents detection of chronic and progressive β-cell dysfunction that is temporally but not mechanistically related to pregnancy. We provide detailed characterization of the β-cell defect in one high-risk group, Hispanic Americans. Finally, we address some of the clinical and research implications of these findings.

Finding no head-to-head research evaluating the cardiovascular and renal benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at different baseline renal function, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the two drugs indirectly. Systematic literature searches were conducted of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, covering their inception until 7 January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA in T2D with different glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were selected. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Finally, 10 RCTs involving 87,334 patients with T2D were included. In patients with an eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, GLP-1RA exhibited a superior ability to reduce the risk of all-cause death compared with SGLT-2i (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58, 0.97), but it was less effective in reducing the risk of renal outcome (RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.15, 2.84) in patients with an eGFR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, in patients with eGFR 30-60 and 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2, GLP-1RA did not show an advantage in reducing the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (RR 1.87 [95% CI 1.15, 3.04] and 1.37 [95% CI 1.05, 1.78], respectively).

Homeobox C4 (HOXC4) links metabolic pathways and correlates inversely with mouse body weight and positively with Ucp1 expression in mouse adipose tissue. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments in mice demonstrated HOXC4's essential role in promoting adipose thermogenesis and providing metabolic benefits. HOXC4 interacts with the nuclear receptor coactivator 1 cofactor via its hexapeptide motif to activate Ucp1 transcription, revealing a novel mechanism of thermogenic gene regulation.

Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD) is a mitochondrial disorder characterized primarily by hearing impairment and diabetes. m.3243A>G, the most common phenotypic variant, causes a complex rewiring of the cell with discontinuous remodeling of both mitochondrial and nuclear genome expressions. We propose that MIDD depends on a combination of insulin resistance and impaired β-cell function that occurs in the presence of high skeletal muscle heteroplasmy (approximately ≥60%) and more moderate cell heteroplasmy (∼25%-72%) for m.3243A>G. Understanding the complex mechanisms of MIDD is necessary to develop disease-specific management guidelines that are presently lacking.

Embedded in the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) hypothesis, maternal hyperglycemia in utero, from preexisting diabetes or gestational diabetes mellitus, predisposes the offspring to excess adiposity and heightened risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes development. This transmission creates a vicious cycle increasing the presence of diabetes from one generation to another, leading to the question: How can we interrupt this vicious cycle? In this article, we present the current state of knowledge on the intergenerational transmission of diabetes from epidemiological life course studies. Then, we discuss the potential mechanisms implicated in the intergenerational transmission of diabetes with a focus on epigenetics. We present novel findings stemming from epigenome-wide association studies of offspring DNA methylation in blood and placental tissues, which shed light on potential molecular mechanisms implicated in the mother-offspring transmission of diabetes. Lastly, with a perspective on how to break the cycle, we consider interventions to prevent offspring obesity and diabetes development before puberty, as a critical period of the intergenerational cycle. This article is part of a series of perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pathway to Stop Diabetes program.

MG53 is predominantly expressed in striated muscles. The role of MG53 in diabetes has gradually been elucidated but is still full of controversy. Some reports have indicated that MG53 is upregulated in animal models with metabolic disorders and that muscle-specific MG53 upregulation is sufficient to induce whole-body insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome through targeting both the insulin receptor (IR) and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Additionally, MG53 has been identified as a myokine/cardiokine that is secreted from striated muscles into the bloodstream, and circulating MG53 has further been shown to trigger insulin resistance by binding to the extracellular domain of the IR, thereby allosterically inhibiting insulin signaling. Conversely, findings have been reported from other studies that contradict these results. Specifically, no significant change in MG53 expression in striated muscles or serum has been observed in diabetic models, and the MG53-mediated degradation of IRS-1 may be insufficient to induce insulin resistance due to the compensatory roles of other IRS subtypes. Furthermore, sustained elevation of MG53 levels in serum or systemic administration of recombinant human MG53 (rhMG53) has shown no impact on metabolic function. In this article, we will fully characterize these two disparate views, strive to provide critical insights into their contrasts, and propose several specific experimental approaches that may yield additional evidence. Our goal is to encourage the scientific community to elucidate the effects of MG53 on metabolic diseases and the molecular mechanisms involved, thereby providing the theoretical basis for the treatment of metabolic diseases and the applications of rhMG53.

Shared medical appointments (SMAs) for diabetes and group prenatal care (GPC) for pregnant patients have emerged as innovative care delivery models. They have the potential to transform diabetes care by overcoming many of the time limitations of traditional one-on-one clinical visits. There is compelling evidence that SMAs improve glycemic control for nonpregnant patients with diabetes, GPC reduces Black and White health disparities in preterm birth, and diabetes GPC increases postpartum glucose tolerance test uptake among patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. GPC models stand out as one of few interventions that reduce racial health disparities, which we hypothesize occurs because their effect is inadvertently exerted on both the patient and clinician through an over 20-h meaningful shared experience. In this article I explore the evidence for SMAs and GPC in diabetes and pregnancy, theoretical underpinnings of the models, their potential to promote more equitable care, and future directions from my perspective as a physician in high-risk obstetrics and 2019 American Diabetes Association Pathway Accelerator Award recipient. This article is part of a series of perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pathway to Stop Diabetes program.

Incidences of childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are climbing at alarming rates. Evidence points to prenatal exposures to maternal obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) as key contributors to these upward trends. Children born to mothers with these conditions face higher risks of obesity and T2D, beyond genetic or shared environmental factors. The underpinnings of this maternal-fetal programming are complex. However, animal studies have shown that such prenatal exposures can lead to changes in brain pathways, particularly in the hypothalamus, leading to obesity and T2D later in life. This article highlights significant findings stemming from research funded by my American Diabetes Association Pathway Accelerator Award and is part of a series of Perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pathway to Stop Diabetes program. This critical support, received more than a decade ago, paved the way for groundbreaking discoveries, translating the neural programming findings from animal models into human studies and exploring new avenues in maternal-fetal programming. Our BrainChild cohort includes >225 children, one-half of whom were exposed in utero to maternal GDM and one-half born to mothers without GDM. Detailed studies in this cohort, including neuroimaging and metabolic profiling, reveal that early fetal exposure to maternal GDM is linked to alterations in brain regions, including the hypothalamus. These neural changes correlate with increased energy intake and predict greater increases in BMI, indicating that early neural changes may underlie and predict later obesity and T2D, as observed in animal models. Ongoing longitudinal studies in this cohort will provide critical insights toward breaking the vicious cycle of maternal-child obesity and T2D.

There are key differences between the central nervous system (CNS) (brain and spinal cord) and peripheral nervous system (PNS), such as glial cell types, whether there is protection by the blood-brain barrier, modes of synaptic connections, etc. However, there are many more similarities between these two arms of the nervous system, including neuronal structure and function, neuroimmune and neurovascular interactions, and, perhaps most essentially, the balance between neural plasticity (including processes like neuron survival, neurite outgrowth, synapse formation, gliogenesis) and neurodegeneration (neuronal death, peripheral neuropathies like axonopathy and demyelination). This article brings together current research evidence on shared mechanisms of nervous system health and disease between the CNS and PNS, particularly with metabolic diseases like obesity and diabetes. This evidence supports the claim that the two arms of the nervous system are critically linked and that previously understudied conditions of central neurodegeneration or peripheral neurodegeneration may actually be manifesting across the entire nervous system at the same time, through shared genetic and cellular mechanisms. This topic has been critically underexplored due to the research silos between studies of the brain and studies of peripheral nerves and an overemphasis on the brain in neuroscience as a field of study. There are likely shared and linked mechanisms for how neurons stay healthy versus undergo damage and disease among this one nervous system in the body-providing new opportunities for understanding neurological disease etiology and future development of neuroprotective therapeutics.

The brain coordinates the homeostatic defense of multiple metabolic variables, including blood glucose levels, in the context of ever-changing external and internal environments. The biologically defended level of glycemia (BDLG) is the net result of brain modulation of insulin-dependent mechanisms in cooperation with the islet, and insulin-independent mechanisms through direct innervation and neuroendocrine control of glucose effector tissues. In this article, we highlight evidence from animal and human studies to develop a framework for the brain's core homeostatic functions-sensory/afferent, integration/processing, and motor/efferent-that contribute to the normal BDLG in health and its elevation in diabetes.

The approval of teplizumab to delay the onset of type 1 diabetes is an important inflection point in the decades-long pursuit to treat the cause of the disease rather than its symptoms. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop of the Diabetes Mellitus Interagency Coordinating Committee titled "Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Screening, and Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes" to review this accomplishment and identify future goals. Speakers representing Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet (TrialNet) and the Immune Tolerance Network emphasized that the ability to robustly identify individuals destined to develop type 1 diabetes was essential for clinical trials. The presenter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration described how regulatory approval relied on data from the single clinical trial of TrialNet with testing of teplizumab for delay of clinical diagnosis, along with confirmatory evidence from studies in patients after diagnosis. The workshop reviewed the etiology of type 1 diabetes as a disease involving multiple immune pathways, highlighting the current understanding of prognostic markers and proposing potential strategies to improve the therapeutic response of disease-modifying therapies based on the mechanism of action. While celebrating these achievements funded by the congressionally appropriated Special Diabetes Program, panelists from professional organizations, nonprofit advocacy/funding groups, and industry also identified significant hurdles in translating this research into clinical care.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from β-cell destruction due to autoimmunity. It has been proposed that β-cell loss is relatively quiescent in the early years after seroconversion to islet antibody positivity (stage 1), with accelerated β-cell loss only developing around 6-18 months prior to clinical diagnosis. This construct implies that immunointervention in this early stage will be of little benefit, since there is little disease activity to modulate. Here, we argue that the apparent lack of progression in early-stage disease may be an artifact of the modality of assessment used. When substantial β-cell function remains, the standard assessment, the oral glucose tolerance test, represents a submaximal stimulus and underestimates the residual function. In contrast, around the time of diagnosis, glucotoxicity exerts a deleterious effect on insulin secretion, giving the impression of disease acceleration. Once glucotoxicity is relieved by insulin therapy, β-cell function partially recovers (the honeymoon effect). However, evidence from recent trials suggests that glucose control has little effect on the underlying disease process. We therefore hypothesize that the autoimmune destruction of β-cells actually progresses at a more or less constant rate through all phases of T1D and that early-stage immunointervention will be both beneficial and desirable.

The islets of Langerhans reside within the endocrine pancreas as highly vascularized microorgans that are responsible for the secretion of key hormones, such as insulin and glucagon. Islet function relies on a range of dynamic molecular processes that include Ca2+ waves, hormone pulses, and complex interactions between islet cell types. Dysfunction of these processes results in poor maintenance of blood glucose homeostasis and is a hallmark of diabetes. Recently, the development of optogenetic methods that rely on light-sensitive molecular actuators has allowed perturbation of islet function with near physiological spatiotemporal acuity. These actuators harness natural photoreceptor proteins and their engineered variants to manipulate mouse and human cells that are not normally light-responsive. Until recently, optogenetics in islet biology has primarily focused on controlling hormone production and secretion; however, studies on further aspects of islet function, including paracrine regulation between islet cell types and dynamics within intracellular signaling pathways, are emerging. Here, we discuss the applicability of optogenetics to islets cells and comprehensively review seminal as well as recent work on optogenetic actuators and their effects in islet function and diabetes mellitus.