There is currently a revolution in the pharmacologic treatment of obesity and diabetes with newly available agonists of incretin receptors. The health benefits of these novel treatments include not only metabolic effects but also improvements in brain neurodegenerative conditions. Receptors for incretins have been described in the hypothalamic appetite regulatory center; however, their expression in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) has been largely overlooked, despite likely contributing important effects. For example, the PNS is essential for the control of numerous metabolically relevant pathways in tissues such as liver, adipose, intestine, and muscle, and incretin receptors are found on nerves innervating some, if not all, of these metabolically important tissues. In this article, we summarize the knowledge to date regarding incretin receptors and incretin drug actions in the PNS, as well as PNS control over incretin release, and the related implications for metabolic disease states that are accompanied by peripheral neuropathy.

Current research and development are ushering in a new era of novel islet β-cell replacement therapies that can no longer be considered solely a rescue treatment for those with unstable glucose management. Clinical trial design must ensure that the application of islet β-cell replacement is broadened beyond the indication of severe hypoglycemia given the potential for establishing insulin-independent normoglycemia. It is imperative that people with type 1 diabetes and their clinicians are at the center of the risk-benefit equipoise as evidence for the safety of cellular products, transplant sites, and immune protection strategies accumulates and an increasing number of options for intervention become available.

The dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) is a key regulator of food intake and body weight. The DRN has historically been associated with feeding, as it houses the single largest population of serotonergic neurons in the mammalian brain. Few studies have demonstrated a direct role for DRN serotonergic neurons in regulating feeding; none of these studies have demonstrated effects near those elicited by serotonin, itself. There are many nonserotonergic cell types in the DRN that play an integral role in feeding. These DRN cell types play important roles in both hunger and satiation.

Sarcopenic obesity, a subtype of obesity, is marked by reduced skeletal muscle mass and function, or sarcopenia, and poses a significant health challenge to older adults as it affects an estimated 28.3% of people aged >60 years. This subtype is unique to older adults as aging exacerbates sarcopenia and obesity due to changes in energy metabolism, hormones and inflammatory markers, and lifestyle factors. Traditional treatments for sarcopenic obesity have been focused on exercise and dietary modifications to reduce fat while maintaining muscle mass. Newer glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dual gastric inhibitory polypeptide/GLP-1 receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1RAs), including liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, have shown great promise to reduce weight, treat obesity-related complications, improve physical function, and improve quality of life, in younger clinical trial populations. However, the use of GLP-1RAs and GIP/GLP-1RAs has not been exhaustively evaluated in older adults with sarcopenic obesity. These medications come with the risk of loss of muscle mass and an increased rate of adverse events. Thus, clinicians should use them cautiously by weighing the potential benefits against their risks. Herein, we discuss a possible approach to using GLP-1RAs and GIP/GLP-1RAs in patients with sarcopenic obesity, including considerations for patient identification, monitoring, maintenance, and discontinuation. In this article we also discuss the emerging treatments that will be available, which may include activin type II receptor antibodies and selective androgen receptor agonists. We conclude by highlighting the advancement of geroscience as a promising field for individualizing treatments in the future.

High-quality weight loss, i.e., a high proportion of fat to skeletal muscle lost during the treatment of obesity, is advantageous for metabolic and physical health. Precise and accurate determinations of skeletal muscle mass in clinical settings are often challenging. In prevention of excessive loss of skeletal muscle during weight loss, advantages include minimization of metabolic adaptation that makes it difficult to sustain weight loss, improved glucose homeostasis and metabolic flexibility, and better mobility and strength. Effective approaches to preserving skeletal muscle include sufficient dietary protein and inclusion of exercise (especially resistance exercise) during weight loss; new pharmacological approaches are under development.

The primary treatment for obesity involves calorie restriction (CR) to promote dietary weight loss achieved through interventions including behavioral modification, bariatric surgery, and antiobesity medications. In adults with obesity, CR-induced weight loss enhances physical function and improves quality of life, while also reducing the burden of various obesity-related chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and atherosclerotic heart disease. However, it is also associated with a decline in lean mass and bone mineral density, which increases the risk of sarcopenia and osteoporosis. When performed alongside CR, progressive resistance training (RT) attenuates this loss of lean mass and bone mass, while the addition of aerobic training (AT) further improves cardiorespiratory fitness. The individual benefits of RT and AT are complementary, and combining both exercise training modalities during CR provides the most optimal benefits for body composition and physical function. The World Health Organization recommends that adults engage in at least 150 min of moderate-intensity or 75 min of vigorous-intensity AT weekly and participate in RT activities involving major muscle groups at least 2 days per week. While this recommendation applies to the general adult population, regular exercise training that incorporates both RT and AT is particularly crucial for adults with obesity undergoing weight loss interventions. This clinical perspective highlights the benefits of exercise training alongside current weight loss strategies, such as lifestyle changes, bariatric surgery, and pharmacotherapy, with a focus on incretin-based therapies.

In combatting the obesity crisis, leveraging mechanisms that lower body weight is critical. The finding that treatment with tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, produces profound weight loss highlights the value of activating the incretin receptors. Supporting this, recent studies have revealed mechanisms by which GIP receptor (GIPR) activation is beneficial in pancreatic islets, the central nervous system (CNS), and adipose tissue. Paradoxically, a hypothesis has emerged that GIPR antagonism could be an additional option in treating obesity. This concept stems from concern that GIP facilitates lipid uptake and storage in adipose tissue, although the lipid-buffering capacity of adipocytes versus other cell types is metabolically favorable. In this article, we highlight the natural physiology of the incretins, noting GIP as the primary incretin. In the CNS, GIPR agonism attenuates nausea and suppresses appetite, features that also help GLP-1 receptor agonism promote a negative energy balance. Further, we provide rationale that, in protecting against ectopic fat distribution and augmenting substrate utilization to promote insulin sensitivity, GIPR activity in adipose tissue is advantageous. Collectively, these attributes support GIPR agonism in the treatment of obesity and metabolic disease.

Current and emerging strategies to therapeutically target weight management include pairing agonism of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) with either agonism or antagonism of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR). On the surface, these two approaches seem contradictory, yet they have produced similar effects for weight loss in clinical studies. Arguments that support the rationale for both approaches are made in these point-counterpoint articles, founded on preclinical studies, human genetics, and clinical outcomes. Here, we attempt to reconcile how two opposing approaches can produce similar effects on body weight by evaluating the leading hypotheses derived from the available evidence.

Obesity is a prevalent disease that also contributes to the incidence and severity of many other chronic diseases and health conditions. Treatment approaches include lifestyle intervention, bariatric surgery, and pharmacological approaches, with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists approved specifically for weight loss having changed the treatment landscape significantly in the last 5 years. Targeting the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor may enhance the metabolic benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonism. These beneficial effects are seen with both GIP receptor antagonism and GIP receptor agonism, although the mechanisms underlying this apparent paradox remain unknown. Here, we summarize the physiologic, genetic, and clinical evidence for pursuing GIP receptor antagonism to achieve metabolic and weight benefits. Both global and central nervous system knockout of GIP receptors protects mice fed a high-fat diet from obesity and insulin resistance. Genome-wide association studies in humans support this notion, correlating lower BMI with GIP receptor genetic variants with reduced function. Pharmacologic approaches in mice and monkeys confirm that GIP receptor antagonism enhances GLP-1-induced weight reduction and other metabolic benefits, and a phase 1 study provides proof of principle that beneficial effects extend to humans. GIP receptor antagonism may represent an important new mechanism to expand the treatment options available to individuals living with obesity.

Islet cell replacement therapies have evolved as a viable treatment option for type 1 diabetes complicated by problematic hypoglycemia and glycemic lability. Refinements of islet manufacturing, islet transplantation procedures, peritransplant recipient management, and immunosuppressive protocols allowed most recipients to achieve favorable outcomes. Subsequent phase 3 trials of transplantation of deceased donor islets documented the effectiveness of transplanted islets in restoring near-normoglycemia, glycemic stability, and protection from severe hypoglycemia, with an acceptable safety profile for the enrolled high-risk population. Health authorities in several countries have approved deceased donor islet transplantation for treating patients with type 1 diabetes and recurrent severe hypoglycemia. These achievements amplified academic and industry efforts to generate pluripotent stem cell-derived β-cells through directed differentiation for β-cell replacement. Preliminary results of ongoing clinical trials suggest that the transplantation of stem cell-derived β-cells can consistently restore insulin independence in immunosuppressed recipients with type 1 diabetes, thus signaling the profound progress made in generating an unlimited and a uniform supply of cells for transplant. Avoiding the risks of chronic immunosuppression represents the next frontier. Several strategies have entered or are approaching clinical investigation, including immune-isolating islets, engineering immune-privileged islet implantation sites, rendering islets immune evasive, and inducing immune tolerance in transplanted islets. Capitalizing on high-dimensional, multiomic technologies for deep profiling of graft-directed immunity and the fate of the graft will provide new insights that promise to translate into sustaining functional graft survival long-term. Leveraging these parallel progression paths will facilitate the wider clinical adoption of cell replacement therapies in diabetes care.

The identification of a "rundlichen Häuflein" by Paul Langerhans more than 150 years ago marked the initiation of a global effort to unravel the mysteries of pancreatic islets, an intricate system of nutrient-sensing, hormone-secreting, and signaling cells. In type 1 diabetes, this interconnected network is vulnerable to malfunction and immune attack, with strategies to prevent or repair islet damage still in their infancy. In 2014, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) established the Human Islet Research Network (HIRN) to accelerate our understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of type 1 diabetes development. In this article, investigators from the HIRN detail pioneering advances, technologies, and systems that contextualize insulin-producing β-cells and other related cells within their physiological environment. Disease models, devices, and therapies are evaluated by the HIRN in light of promising functional and mechanistic data. Collaborative relationships and opportunities within this network are emphasized as a means of enhancing the quality of innovative research and talent in science. Topics are developed through a series of questions, achievements, and milestones, with the 75th anniversary of the NIDDK as an opportunity to reflect on the past, present, and future of type 1 diabetes research.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with diabetes. Individuals with type 1 diabetes have a two- to fourfold higher risk of CVD in comparison with the general population, driven by an earlier onset and increased lifetime incidence of CVD events and mortality. Similarly, type 2 diabetes confers two- to threefold increased CVD risk, usually alongside metabolic syndrome, obesity, and hypertension. Despite advancements in methods for achieving glycemic control, the CVD burden remains disproportionately high in diabetes. The mechanisms driving elevated risk are complex and variably multifactorial, involving hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and a hypercoagulable state. Unfortunately, critical gaps in understanding persist on how these factors interact to promote CVD in type 1 versus type 2 diabetes, particularly across disease stages and age. Addressing these knowledge gaps is essential to developing targeted therapies that can effectively mitigate CVD risk. To meet this need, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, in partnership with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, recently formed the Cardiovascular Repository for Type 1 Diabetes (CaRe-T1D) program. Its mission is to elucidate the molecular and cellular pathways linking diabetes with CVD through the provision of high-quality human tissues for investigator-led analyses using cutting-edge technologies and collaborative data sharing to advance precision medicine and reduce the global burden of diabetes-associated cardiovascular complications.

In the last two decades, significant progress has been made toward understanding the genetic basis of type 2 diabetes. An important supporter of this research has been the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), most recently through the Accelerating Medicines Partnership Program for Type 2 Diabetes (AMP T2D) and Accelerating Medicines Partnership Program for Common Metabolic Diseases (AMP CMD). These public-private partnerships of the National Institutes of Health, multiple biopharmaceutical and life sciences companies, and nonprofit organizations, facilitated and managed by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, were designed to improve understanding of therapeutically relevant biological pathways for type 2 diabetes. On the occasion of NIDDK's 75th anniversary, we review the history of NIDDK support for these partnerships, which saw the convergence of research directions prioritized by academic consortia, the pharmaceutical industry, and government funders. Although the NIDDK was not the sole originator or funder of these efforts, its support and leadership have been pivotal to the partnerships' success and have enabled their research to be broadly accessible through the AMP Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal (CMDKP) and the AMP Common Metabolic Diseases Genome Atlas (CMDGA). Findings from AMP CMD align with NIDDK's mission to conduct research and share results with the goal of improving health and quality of life.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. It is generally defined as glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The pathogenesis of GDM has long been attributed to inadequate pancreatic β-cell compensation for the physiological insulin resistance of pregnancy. This defect is thought to resolve after pregnancy but become manifest in later life as an increased risk of diabetes. Examination of mechanisms underlying GDM does not support this commonly held picture. In this Perspective, we present evidence that, like diabetes outside of pregnancy, GDM has no single etiology. It results from multiple causes of a common physiological manifestation, inadequate β-cell function, which leads to a common clinical manifestation, elevated glucose levels. We provide evidence that GDM often represents detection of chronic and progressive β-cell dysfunction that is temporally but not mechanistically related to pregnancy. We provide detailed characterization of the β-cell defect in one high-risk group, Hispanic Americans. Finally, we address some of the clinical and research implications of these findings.

Finding no head-to-head research evaluating the cardiovascular and renal benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at different baseline renal function, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the two drugs indirectly. Systematic literature searches were conducted of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, covering their inception until 7 January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA in T2D with different glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were selected. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Finally, 10 RCTs involving 87,334 patients with T2D were included. In patients with an eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, GLP-1RA exhibited a superior ability to reduce the risk of all-cause death compared with SGLT-2i (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58, 0.97), but it was less effective in reducing the risk of renal outcome (RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.15, 2.84) in patients with an eGFR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, in patients with eGFR 30-60 and 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2, GLP-1RA did not show an advantage in reducing the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (RR 1.87 [95% CI 1.15, 3.04] and 1.37 [95% CI 1.05, 1.78], respectively).

Homeobox C4 (HOXC4) links metabolic pathways and correlates inversely with mouse body weight and positively with Ucp1 expression in mouse adipose tissue. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments in mice demonstrated HOXC4's essential role in promoting adipose thermogenesis and providing metabolic benefits. HOXC4 interacts with the nuclear receptor coactivator 1 cofactor via its hexapeptide motif to activate Ucp1 transcription, revealing a novel mechanism of thermogenic gene regulation.

Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD) is a mitochondrial disorder characterized primarily by hearing impairment and diabetes. m.3243A>G, the most common phenotypic variant, causes a complex rewiring of the cell with discontinuous remodeling of both mitochondrial and nuclear genome expressions. We propose that MIDD depends on a combination of insulin resistance and impaired β-cell function that occurs in the presence of high skeletal muscle heteroplasmy (approximately ≥60%) and more moderate cell heteroplasmy (∼25%-72%) for m.3243A>G. Understanding the complex mechanisms of MIDD is necessary to develop disease-specific management guidelines that are presently lacking.

Embedded in the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) hypothesis, maternal hyperglycemia in utero, from preexisting diabetes or gestational diabetes mellitus, predisposes the offspring to excess adiposity and heightened risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes development. This transmission creates a vicious cycle increasing the presence of diabetes from one generation to another, leading to the question: How can we interrupt this vicious cycle? In this article, we present the current state of knowledge on the intergenerational transmission of diabetes from epidemiological life course studies. Then, we discuss the potential mechanisms implicated in the intergenerational transmission of diabetes with a focus on epigenetics. We present novel findings stemming from epigenome-wide association studies of offspring DNA methylation in blood and placental tissues, which shed light on potential molecular mechanisms implicated in the mother-offspring transmission of diabetes. Lastly, with a perspective on how to break the cycle, we consider interventions to prevent offspring obesity and diabetes development before puberty, as a critical period of the intergenerational cycle. This article is part of a series of perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pathway to Stop Diabetes program.

MG53 is predominantly expressed in striated muscles. The role of MG53 in diabetes has gradually been elucidated but is still full of controversy. Some reports have indicated that MG53 is upregulated in animal models with metabolic disorders and that muscle-specific MG53 upregulation is sufficient to induce whole-body insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome through targeting both the insulin receptor (IR) and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Additionally, MG53 has been identified as a myokine/cardiokine that is secreted from striated muscles into the bloodstream, and circulating MG53 has further been shown to trigger insulin resistance by binding to the extracellular domain of the IR, thereby allosterically inhibiting insulin signaling. Conversely, findings have been reported from other studies that contradict these results. Specifically, no significant change in MG53 expression in striated muscles or serum has been observed in diabetic models, and the MG53-mediated degradation of IRS-1 may be insufficient to induce insulin resistance due to the compensatory roles of other IRS subtypes. Furthermore, sustained elevation of MG53 levels in serum or systemic administration of recombinant human MG53 (rhMG53) has shown no impact on metabolic function. In this article, we will fully characterize these two disparate views, strive to provide critical insights into their contrasts, and propose several specific experimental approaches that may yield additional evidence. Our goal is to encourage the scientific community to elucidate the effects of MG53 on metabolic diseases and the molecular mechanisms involved, thereby providing the theoretical basis for the treatment of metabolic diseases and the applications of rhMG53.