The multicenter, phase 3 German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) ReLApsE trial randomized patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) equally to lenalidomide/dexamethasone (LEN/DEX; 25 mg days 1-21, DEX 40 mg weekly, in 4-week cycles) reinduction, salvage high-dose chemotherapy (sHDCT; melphalan 200 mg/m2), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and LEN maintenance (10 mg/d; transplant arm, n = 139) vs continuous LEN/DEX (control arm, n = 138). Ninety-four percent of patients had received frontline HDCT/ASCT. We report an updated analysis of survival end points with a median follow-up of 99 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.5 and 19.3 months in the transplant and control arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; P = .9). Median overall survival (OS) was 67.1 and 62.7 months, respectively, (HR 0.89; P = .44). Landmark analyses from sHDCT and the contemporaneous LEN/DEX cycle 5 were performed because of 29% dropout of patients before sHDCT/ASCT in the transplant arm but did not reveal significant differences in PFS/OS. Time to progression after frontline HDCT/ASCT was a prognostic factor but did not predict benefit from sHDCT/ASCT. The GMMG ReLApsE trial does not support use of sHDCT/ASCT in RRMM after frontline HDCT/ASCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as #EudraCT2009-013856-61.

Complement C5 inhibitor treatment with ravulizumab or eculizumab for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) improves outcomes and survival. Some patients remain anemic due to clinically significant extravascular hemolysis (cs-EVH; hemoglobin [Hb] ≤9.5 g/dL and absolute reticulocyte count [ARC] ≥120 × 109/L). In the phase 3 ALPHA trial, participants received oral factor D inhibitor danicopan (150 mg 3 times daily) or placebo plus ravulizumab or eculizumab during the 12-week, double-blind treatment period 1 (TP1); those receiving placebo switched to danicopan during the subsequent 12-week, open-label TP2 and continued during the 2-year long-term extension (LTE). There were 86 participants randomized in the study, of whom 82 entered TP2, and 80 entered LTE. The primary end point was met, with Hb improvements from baseline at week 12 (least squares mean change, 2.8 g/dL) with danicopan. For participants switching from placebo to danicopan at week 12, improvements in mean Hb were observed at week 24. Similar trends were observed for the proportion of participants with ≥2 g/dL Hb increase, ARC, proportion of participants achieving transfusion avoidance, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale scores. Improvements were maintained up to week 72. No new safety signals were observed. The breakthrough hemolysis rate was 6 events per 100 patient-years. These long-term data demonstrate sustained efficacy and safety of danicopan plus ravulizumab/eculizumab for continued control of terminal complement activity, intravascular hemolysis, and cs-EVH in PNH. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04469465.

Early intervention in smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) may delay progression to MM. Here, we present the final analysis of the phase 2 CENTAURUS study. In total, 123 patients with intermediate/high-risk SMM were randomized to IV daratumumab 16 mg/kg after a long-intense (n = 41), intermediate (n = 41), or short-intense (n = 41) dosing schedule. At a combined median follow-up of 85.2 months, in the long-intense, intermediate, and short-intense arms complete response or better rates were 4.9%, 9.8%, and 0%; overall response rates were 58.5%, 53.7%, and 37.5%; progressive disease/death rates were 0.096, 0.102, and 0.109 (P < .0001 for all arms); and median progression-free survival was not reached, 84.4, and 74.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached in any arm. Thirty-six patients in the long-intense or intermediate arms continued daratumumab in an optional extension phase after completing 20 cycles of per-protocol treatment. The median duration of study treatment was 44.0 (range, 1.0-91.6), 35.2 (range, 1.9-90.6), and 1.6 (range, 0.1-1.9) months in the long-intense, intermediate, and short-intense arms, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. With extended follow-up (median, ∼7 years), these data highlight the tolerability of daratumumab and support ongoing trials investigating daratumumab as an early intervention for SMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02316106.

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) are rare autoimmune hemolytic anemias characterized by red blood cell destruction, largely attributable to complement activation resulting in intravascular and extravascular hemolysis. Pegcetacoplan is a subcutaneously administered C3-targeted therapy, which may be suitable for treating CAD and wAIHA. In this open-label phase 2 study, analyses were conducted in 2 cohorts, 1 for patients with CAD and the other for those with wAIHA. In each cohort, patients were randomly assigned to receive pegcetacoplan 270 mg/d or 360 mg/d for up to 48 weeks. Safety end points included the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI). Efficacy end points included change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb), lactate dehydrogenase, absolute reticulocyte count, haptoglobin, indirect bilirubin, and functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-fatigue scale. Thirteen of 13 (100%) and 10 of 11 (91%) patients with CAD and wAIHA, respectively, experienced at least 1 TEAE. Ten patients had at least 1 serious AE; none were considered related to pegcetacoplan. The only treatment-related AESIs were injection site reactions. Pegcetacoplan increased Hb levels, reduced hemolysis, and increased FACIT-fatigue scale scores in the first weeks; at week 48 the median (interquartile range) change from baseline Hb for the CAD and wAIHA total groups was 2.4 (0.90-3.00) and 1.7 g/dL (-1.40 to 2.90), respectively, and improvements in hemolysis and FACIT-fatigue scale scores were maintained. This study demonstrated that pegcetacoplan is generally well tolerated and suggests it can be effective for patients with CAD and wAIHA. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03226678.

Despite several approved therapies, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease with high unmet medical need. "Off-the-shelf" T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) have demonstrated high objective response rates in heavily pretreated patients with MM; however, primary resistance, short duration of response, and relapse driven by antigen shift frequently occur. Although GPRC5D represents the most selective target in MM, recent findings indicate antigen loss occurs more frequently than with BCMA. Thus, anti-GPRC5D immunotherapies must hit hard during a short period of time. Here, we characterize forimtamig, a novel GPRC5D-targeting TCB with 2+1 format. Bivalent binding of forimtamig to GPRC5D confers higher affinity than classical 1+1 TCB formats correlating with formation of more stable immunological synapses and higher potency in tumor cell killing and T-cell activation. Using an orthotopic mouse model of MM, forimtamig recruited T effector cells to the bone marrow and induced rapid tumor killing even after the introduction of step-up dosing to mitigate cytokine release. Combination of forimtamig with standard-of-care agents including anti-CD38 antibodies, immunomodulatory drugs, and proteasome inhibitors improved depth and duration of response. The combination of forimtamig with novel therapeutic agents including BCMA TCB and cereblon E3 ligase modulatory drugs was potent and prevented occurrence of GPRC5D -negative tumor relapse. Forimtamig is currently being evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials in patients with relapsed and refractory MM for monotherapy and in combination treatments. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04557150.

A robust prognostic and biological classification for newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) using molecular profiling remains challenging. FL tumors from patients treated in the RELEVANCE trial with rituximab-chemotherapy (R-chemo) or rituximab-lenalidomide (R2) were analyzed using RNA sequencing, DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Unsupervised gene clustering identified 2 gene expression signatures (GSs) enriched in normal memory (MEM) B cells and germinal center (GC) B-cell signals, respectively. These 2 GSs were combined into a 20-gene predictor (FL20) to classify patients into MEM-like (n = 160) or GC-like (n = 164) subtypes, which also displayed different mutational profiles. In the R-chemo arm, patients with MEM-like FL had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with GC-like FL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; P = .0023). In the R2 arm, both subtypes had comparable PFS, demonstrating that R2 has a benefit over R-chemo for patients with MEM-like FL (HR, 0.54; P = .011). The prognostic value of FL20 was validated in an independent FL cohort with R-chemo treatment (GSE119214 [n = 137]). An IHC algorithm (FLcm) that used FOXP1, LMO2, CD22, and MUM1 antibodies was developed with significant prognostic correlation with FL20. These data indicate that FL tumors can be classified into MEM-like and GC-like subtypes that are biologically distinct and clinically different in their risk profile. The FLcm assay can be used in routine clinical practice to identify patients with MEM-like FL who might benefit from therapies other than R-chemo, such as the R2 combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01476787 and #NCT01650701.

No randomized trial has directly compared daratumumab and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance with standard-of-care lenalidomide (R) alone after transplant. Herein, we report the primary results of the phase 3 AURIGA study evaluating D-R vs R maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had very good or better partial response, were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (10-5) and anti-CD38-naïve after transplant. Two hundred patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to D-R (n = 99) or R (n = 101) maintenance for up to 36 cycles. The MRD-negative (10-5) conversion rate by 12 months from start of maintenance (primary end point) was significantly higher for D-R than R (50.5% vs 18.8%; odds ratio [OR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.37-8.57; P < .0001). MRD-negative (10-6) conversion rate was similarly higher with D-R (23.2% vs 5.0%; OR, 5.97; 95% CI, 2.15-16.58; P = .0002). At median follow-up (32.3 months), D-R achieved a higher overall MRD-negative (10-5) conversion rate (D-R, 60.6% vs R, 27.7%; OR, 4.12; 95% CI, 2.26-7.52; P < .0001) and complete response rate or better (75.8% vs 61.4%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.08-3.69; P = .0255) vs R. Progression-free survival (PFS) favored D-R vs R (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97); estimated 30-month PFS rates were 82.7% for D-R and 66.4% for R. Incidences of grade 3/4 cytopenias (54.2% vs 46.9%) and infections (18.8% vs 13.3%) were slightly higher with D-R than R. In conclusion, D-R maintenance achieved a higher MRD-negative conversion rate and improved PFS after transplant vs R, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03901963.

Dexamethasone is a key component of induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), despite common toxicities, including hyperglycemia and insomnia. In the randomized ECOG E4A03 trial, dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly was associated with lower mortality than higher doses. However, the performance of dexamethasone dose reductions below this threshold with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NDMM has not been fully characterized. We conducted a secondary pooled analysis of the SWOG 0777 and SWOG 1211 studies of NDMM, which used lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone, with or without bortezomib, and with or without elotuzumab. The planned dexamethasone intensity was 40 to 60 mg weekly in all arms. Patients were categorized into FD-DEX (full-dose dexamethasone maintained throughout induction) or LD-DEX (lowered-dose dexamethasone or discontinuation; only permitted for grade 3+ toxicities per both study protocols). Of the 541 evaluated patients, the LD-DEX group comprised 373 patients (69%). There were no differences in PFS or OS between the FD-DEX and LD-DEX groups, which were balanced in terms of age, stage, and performance status. Predictors of PFS and OS in the multivariate models were treatment arm, age ≥70 years, and thrombocytopenia. FD-DEX did not significantly improve either outcome. Our study suggests that dexamethasone dose reductions are common in multiple myeloma, even within clinical trials. Given the many toxicities and unclear benefits of dexamethasone in the era of modern treatment regimens, dexamethasone dose reduction during NDMM induction warrants further prospective studies. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00644228 and NCT01668719.

The ALPINE trial established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; here, we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.84), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). Although median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common nonhematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs 6 cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03734016.

Children with ETV6::RUNX1 or high-hyperdiploid B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have favorable outcomes. The St. Jude (SJ) classification considers these patients low risk, regardless of their National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk classification, except when there is slow minimal residual disease (MRD) response or central nervous system/testicular involvement. We analyzed outcomes in children (aged 1-18.99 years) with these genotypes in the SJ Total XV/XVI studies (2000-2017). Patients with ETV6::RUNX1 (n = 222) or high-hyperdiploid (n = 296) B-ALL had 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 97.7% ± 1.1% and 94.7% ± 1.4%, respectively. For ETV6::RUNX1, EFS was comparable between NCI standard-risk and high-risk patients and between SJ low-risk and standard-risk patients. Of the 40 NCI high-risk patients, 37 who received SJ low-risk therapy had excellent EFS (97.3% ± 2.8%). For high-hyperdiploid B-ALL, NCI high-risk patients had worse EFS than standard-risk patients (87.6% ± 4.5% vs 96.4% ± 1.3%; P = .016). EFS was similar for NCI standard-risk and high-risk patients classified as SJ low risk (96.0% ± 1.5% and 96.9% ± 3.2%; P = .719). However, EFS was worse for NCI high-risk patients than for NCI standard-risk patients receiving SJ standard/high-risk therapy (77.4% ± 8.2% vs 98.0% ± 2.2%; P = .004). NCI high-risk patients with ETV6::RUNX1 or high-hyperdiploid B-ALL who received SJ low-risk therapy had lower incidences of thrombosis (P = .013) and pancreatitis (P = .011) than those who received SJ standard/high-risk therapy. MRD-directed therapy yielded excellent outcomes, except for NCI high-risk high-hyperdiploid B-ALL patients with slow MRD response, who require new treatment approaches. Among NCI high-risk patients, 93% with ETV6::RUNX1 and 54% with high-hyperdiploid B-ALL experienced excellent outcomes with a low-intensity regimen. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00137111 and #NCT00549848.

Outcomes are poor in triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.

In the CLL14 study, patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting conditions were randomized to 12 cycles of venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi, n = 216) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (Clb-Obi, n = 216). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events. Patient reported outcomes of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. At a median observation time of 76.4 months, PFS remained superior for Ven-Obi compared with Clb-Obi (median, 76.2 vs 36.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.52; P < .0001). Likewise, TTNT was longer after Ven-Obi (6-year TTNT, 65.2% vs 37.1%; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; P < .0001). In the Ven-Obi arm, presence of del(17p), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region, and lymph node size of ≥5 cm were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. The 6-year OS rate was 78.7% in the Ven-Obi and 69.2% in the Clb-Obi arm (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-1.01; P = .052). A significantly longer TUDD in global health status/QoL was observed in the Ven-Obi than in the Clb-Obi arm (median, 82.1 vs 65.1 months; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97). Follow-up-adjusted second primary malignancies incidence rates were 2.3 and 1.4 per 1000 patient-months in the Ven-Obi and Clb-Obi arm, respectively. The sustained long-term survival and QoL benefits support the use of 1-year fixed-duration Ven-Obi in CLL. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02242942.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag plus diacerein vs eltrombopag alone in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who were previously unresponsive to 14 days of eltrombopag treatment at the full dose. Recruited patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either eltrombopag plus diacerein (n = 50) or eltrombopag monotherapy (n = 52). Overall response rate, defined as a platelet count of ≥30 × 109/L, at least doubling of the baseline platelet count, and no bleeding, was reached in 44% of patients in the eltrombopag plus diacerein group compared with 13% in the eltrombopag group at day 15 (P = .0009), and reached in 42% of patients in the combination group compared with 12% in the monotherapy group at day 28 (P = .0006). The addition of diacerein to eltrombopag also led to a longer duration of response (P = .0004). The 2 most common treatment-emergent adverse events were respiratory infection and gastrointestinal reactions in the combination group, and fatigue and respiratory infection in the eltrombopag group. In conclusion, eltrombopag plus diacerein was well tolerated, and induced higher overall response rates and longer duration of response than eltrombopag alone, offering a rejuvenating salvage therapy for patients with ITP unresponsive to 14 days of full dosage eltrombopag. Our work has the potential to enhance the care of patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, reducing the need for rapid transitions to less-preferable therapies. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04917679.

Although initial therapy of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is not standardized, bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) is commonly used in older patients. Rituximab (R) maintenance after induction is often used. Thus, the open-label, randomized phase 2 ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1411 trial was designed to test 2 questions: (1) does addition of bortezomib to BR induction (BVR) and/or (2) addition of lenalidomide to rituximab (LR) maintenance improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naïve MCL? From 2012 to 2016, 373 previously untreated patients, 87% aged ≥60 years, were enrolled in this trial. At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, there is no difference in the median PFS of BR compared with BVR (5.5 vs 6.4 years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.16). There were no unexpected additional toxicities with BVR treatment compared with BR, with no impact on total dose/duration of treatment received. Independent of the induction treatment, addition of lenalidomide did not significantly improve PFS, with median PFS in R vs LR (5.9 vs 7.2 years; HR, 0.84; 90% CI, 0.62-1.15). Most patients completed the planned 24 cycles of LR at the scheduled dose. In summary, adding bortezomib to BR induction does not prolong PFS in treatment-naïve MCL, and LR maintenance was not associated with longer PFS compared with R alone after BR. Nonetheless, the >5-year median PFS outcomes in this prospective cooperative group trial indicate the efficacy of BR followed by R maintenance as highly effective initial therapy for older patients with MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01415752.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression during Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor treatment is typically characterized by emergent B-cell receptor pathway mutations. Using peripheral blood samples from patients with relapsed/refractory CLL in ELEVATE-RR (NCT02477696; median 2 prior therapies), we report clonal evolution data for patients progressing on acalabrutinib or ibrutinib (median follow-up, 41 months). Paired (baseline and progression) samples were available for 47 (excluding 1 Richter) acalabrutinib-treated and 30 (excluding 6 Richter) ibrutinib-treated patients. At progression, emergent BTK mutations were observed in 31 acalabrutinib-treated (66%) and 11 ibrutinib-treated patients (37%; median variant allele fraction [VAF], 16.1% vs 15.6%, respectively). BTK C481S mutations were most common in both groups; T474I (n = 9; 8 co-occurring with C481) and the novel E41V mutation within the pleckstrin homology domain of BTK (n = 1) occurred with acalabrutinib, whereas neither mutation occurred with ibrutinib. L528W and A428D comutations presented in 1 ibrutinib-treated patient. Preexisting TP53 mutations were present in 25 acalabrutinib-treated (53.2%) and 16 ibrutinib-treated patients (53.3%) at screening. Emergent TP53 mutations occurred with acalabrutinib and ibrutinib (13% vs 7%; median VAF, 6.0% vs 37.3%, respectively). Six acalabrutinib-treated patients and 1 ibrutinib-treated patient had emergent TP53/BTK comutations. Emergent PLCG2 mutations occurred in 3 acalabrutinib-treated (6%) and 6 ibrutinib-treated patients (20%). One acalabrutinib-treated patient and 4 ibrutinib-treated patients had emergent BTK/PLCG2 comutations. Although common BTK C481 mutations were observed with both treatments, patterns of mutation and comutation frequency, mutation VAF, and uncommon BTK variants varied with acalabrutinib (T474I and E41V) and ibrutinib (L528W and A428D) in this patient population. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696.

We hypothesized that fit older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with decitabine (DEC) would report better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes than those receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC). We conducted a phase 3 randomized trial to compare DEC (10-day schedule) with IC (3+7) in older fit patients with AML. HRQoL was a secondary end point, and it was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in conjunction with its elderly module (EORTC QLQ-ELD14). The following scales were a priori selected for defining the primary end point: physical and role functioning, fatigue, pain, and burden of illness. HRQoL was assessed at baseline, at regeneration from cycle 2, and at 6 and 12 months after randomization, and also before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and 100 days after transplantation. Overall, 606 patients underwent randomization. At 2 months, the risk of HRQoL deterioration was lower in the DEC arm than in the 3+7 arm; 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69-82) vs 88% (95% CI, 82-93); odds ratio, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.24-0.76; P = .003). No statistically significant HRQoL differences were observed between treatment arms at the long-term evaluation combining assessments at 6 and 12 months. HRQoL deteriorations between baseline and after allo-HSCT were observed in both arms. However, these deteriorations were not clinically meaningful in patients randomized to DEC, whereas this was the case for those in the 3+7 arm, in 4 of 5 primary HRQoL scales. Our HRQoL findings suggest that lower-intensity treatment with DEC may be preferable to current standard IC (3+7) in fit older patients with AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02172872.

Obinutuzumab (O) and rituximab (R) are 2 CD antibodies that have never been compared in a prospective randomized trial of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Herein, we report the long-term outcome of the LyMa-101 trial, in which newly diagnosed patients with MCL were treated with chemotherapy plus O before transplantation, followed by O maintenance (O group). We then compared these patients with those treated with the same treatment design with R instead of O (R group). A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the 2 populations (O vs R groups) in terms of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction (EOI), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In LyMa-101, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS after inclusion (n = 85) were 83.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5-89.8) and 86.9% (95% CI, 77.6-92.5), respectively. At EOI, patients treated in the O group had more frequent bone marrow MRD negativity than those treated in the R group (83.1% vs 63.4%; χ2, P = .007). PSM resulted in 2 sets of 82 patients with comparable characteristics at inclusion. From treatment initiation, the O group had a longer estimated 5-year PFS (P = .029; 82.8% vs 66.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-3.76) and OS (P = .039; 86.4% vs 71.4%; HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.01-4.16) compared with the R group. Causes of death were comparable in the 2 groups, the most common cause being lymphoma. O before transplantation and in maintenance provides better disease control and enhances PFS and OS compared with R in transplant-eligible patients with MCL. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00921414 and NCT02896582.

We investigated efficacy and safety of mavorixafor, an oral CXCR4 antagonist, in participants with warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome, a rare immunodeficiency caused by CXCR4 gain-of-function variants. This randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled participants aged ≥12 years with WHIM syndrome and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤0.4 × 103/μL. Participants received once-daily mavorixafor or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was time (hours) above ANC threshold ≥0.5 × 103/μL (TATANC; over 24 hours). Secondary end points included TAT absolute lymphocyte count ≥1.0 × 103/μL (TATALC; over 24 hours); absolute changes in white blood cell (WBC), ANC, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) from baseline; annualized infection rate; infection duration; and total infection score (combined infection number/severity). In 31 participants (mavorixafor, n = 14; placebo, n = 17), mavorixafor least squares (LS) mean TATANC was 15.0 hours and 2.8 hours for placebo (P < .001). Mavorixafor LS mean TATALC was 15.8 hours and 4.6 hours for placebo (P < .001). Annualized infection rates were 60% lower with mavorixafor vs placebo (LS mean 1.7 vs 4.2; nominal P = .007), and total infection scores were 40% lower (7.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-13.2] vs 12.3 [95% CI, 7.2-17.3]). Treatment with mavorixafor reduced infection frequency, severity, duration, and antibiotic use. No discontinuations occurred due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); no related serious TEAEs were observed. Overall, mavorixafor treatment demonstrated significant increases in LS mean TATANC and TATALC, reduced infection frequency, severity/duration, and was well tolerated. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03995108.

Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) assessed using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography, a measure of tumor burden, is a promising prognostic indicator in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). This exploratory analysis evaluated relationships between baseline MTV (categorized as low [median or less] vs high [greater than median]) and clinical outcomes in the phase 3 ZUMA-7 study (NCT03391466). Patients with LBCL relapsed within 12 months of or refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) or standard care (2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients who had a response). All P values are descriptive. Within high- and low-MTV subgroups, event-free survival (EFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were superior with axi-cel vs standard care. EFS in patients with high MTV (vs low MTV) was numerically shorter with axi-cel and was significantly shorter with standard care. PFS was shorter in patients with high MTV vs low MTV in both the axi-cel and standard-care arms, and median MTV was lower in patients in ongoing response at data cutoff vs others. Median MTV was higher in patients treated with axi-cel who experienced grade ≥3 neurologic events or cytokine release syndrome (CRS) than in patients with grade 1/2 or no neurologic events or CRS, respectively. Baseline MTV less than or equal to median was associated with better clinical outcomes in patients receiving axi-cel or standard care for second-line LBCL. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03391466.

Given the poor outcome of refractory and relapsing T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), identifying prognostic markers is still challenging. Using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis, we provide a comprehensive analysis of genomic imbalances in a cohort of 317 newly diagnosed patients with T-ALL including 135 children and 182 adults with respect to clinical and biological features and outcomes. SNP array results identified at least 1 somatic genomic imbalance in virtually all patients with T-ALL (∼96%). Del(9)(p21) (∼70%) and UPD(9)p21)/CDKN2A/B (∼28%) were the most frequent genomic imbalances. Unexpectedly del(13)(q14)/RB1/DLEU1 (∼14%) was the second most frequent copy number variant followed by del(6)(q15)/CASP8AP2 (∼11%), del(1)(p33)/SIL-TAL1 (∼11%), del(12)(p13)ETV6/CDKN1B (∼9%), del(18)(p11)/PTPN2 (∼9%), del(1)(p36)/RPL22 (∼9%), and del(17)(q11)/NF1/SUZ12 (∼8%). SNP array also revealed distinct profiles of genomic imbalances according to age, immunophenotype, and oncogenetic subgroups. In particular, adult patients with T-ALL demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of del(1)(p36)/RPL22, and del(13)(q14)/RB1/DLEU1, and lower incidence of del(9)(p21) and UPD(9p21)/CDKN2A/B. We determined a threshold of 15 genomic imbalances to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups of relapse. Survival analysis also revealed the poor outcome, despite the low number of affected cases, conferred by the presence of chromothripsis (n = 6, ∼2%), del(16)(p13)/CREBBP (n = 15, ∼5%) as well as the newly-identified recurrent gain at 6q27 involving MLLT4 (n = 10, ∼3%). Genomic complexity, del(16)(p13)/CREBBP and gain at 6q27 involving MLLT4, maintained their significance in multivariate analysis for survival outcome. Our study thus demonstrated that whole genome analysis of imbalances provides new insights to refine risk stratification in T-ALL. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00222027 and #NCT00327678, and as #FRALLE 2000T trial.